Listen to the article
Trump Continues to Spread False Claims About FBI Involvement in Capitol Riot
Donald Trump has once again promoted unsubstantiated claims about the January 6, 2021 Capitol insurrection, falsely suggesting that “Biden’s FBI” placed 274 agents among the crowd that stormed the U.S. Capitol that day. This assertion, made in a recent post on Truth Social, directly contradicts findings from official investigations that have repeatedly debunked allegations of federal infiltration or orchestration of the violent events.
In his October 12, 2025 social media post, the former president implied that if his claims about FBI involvement were true, those wrongly accused would deserve apologies. This statement represents the latest in a series of misleading narratives Trump has promoted about the Capitol riot, despite numerous investigations refuting such allegations.
The role of federal law enforcement during the January 6 events has been thoroughly investigated by oversight bodies. A December 2024 report from the Department of Justice’s inspector general found no evidence supporting claims that FBI agents were embedded in the crowd to instigate or monitor the attack. The report did confirm that 26 FBI confidential informants were present at the event, but emphasized they were not active agents and played no role in planning or facilitating the riot.
Trump’s specific claim about 274 FBI agents appears to mischaracterize the FBI’s legitimate response to the violence after the breach had already occurred. Official records confirm that 274 agents were indeed deployed, but these personnel were sent to support local law enforcement in response to the unfolding crisis—not as participants in the insurrection as Trump’s statement suggests.
Even Kash Patel, the FBI director appointed by Trump, has stopped short of supporting conspiracy theories about the FBI orchestrating the riot. While Patel criticized certain aspects of the agency’s response in a September 2025 post on X (formerly Twitter), referring to agents involved in crowd control as acting “against FBI standards,” he did not endorse the notion that the FBI was responsible for instigating the violence.
Multiple investigations into the events of January 6 have consistently shown that the FBI was not behind the Capitol attack. The DOJ inspector general report noted that while some FBI informants entered the Capitol without authorization, these were isolated incidents that did not reflect any coordinated effort to escalate the situation. The report specifically found no evidence that the FBI was involved with the rioters prior to the attack.
The FBI’s primary function on January 6 was to assist with law enforcement response after the Capitol was breached. Agents were dispatched to manage the crisis situation, not to influence or provoke the violence that unfolded that day.
The legal aftermath of the January 6 insurrection continues to evolve, with more than 1,400 individuals arrested and over 1,000 convicted for crimes related to the riot. The violence resulted in multiple deaths and numerous injuries to civilians and law enforcement officers alike. Since returning to office in January 2025, Trump has issued pardons for many individuals convicted in connection with the riot, including 14 commutations and more than 1,200 full pardons.
Despite the comprehensive investigations and official reports clearing the FBI of any orchestrated involvement in the Capitol riot, Trump’s persistent promotion of these false narratives continues to fuel polarization around the events of January 6. These claims appear to be part of a broader effort to challenge the legitimacy of the 2020 election results and the subsequent transition of power.
Political analysts note that such misinformation remains damaging to public trust in institutions and contributes to ongoing divisions in American society, even as the justice system continues to process cases related to one of the most significant attacks on American democracy in modern history.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
14 Comments
The events of January 6th were deeply troubling, and I appreciate the efforts to investigate them thoroughly and objectively. While there may still be unanswered questions, the DOJ report seems clear in debunking the alleged FBI involvement. We should be cautious about accepting unverified claims, no matter the source, and instead focus on the findings of reliable, impartial authorities.
Well said. Maintaining a fact-based, impartial approach is crucial, especially when it comes to such a politically charged and sensitive issue. We must be vigilant against the spread of misinformation, and instead rely on the conclusions of rigorous official inquiries.
I’m glad to see the DOJ’s inspector general report thoroughly investigated the claims of FBI infiltration and found no supporting evidence. It’s crucial we rely on the conclusions of rigorous, impartial inquiries rather than unsubstantiated narratives, no matter the source. Spreading misinformation, even inadvertently, can have serious consequences.
Absolutely. Maintaining a commitment to the truth, even when it may be uncomfortable or politically inconvenient, is essential for preserving the integrity of our democratic institutions. We must be vigilant against the spread of unfounded claims.
The Capitol riot was a complex and disturbing event, and I appreciate the efforts of oversight bodies to thoroughly investigate what happened. While there may still be unanswered questions, the DOJ report seems to have debunked the alleged FBI involvement. We should be wary of attempts to spread misinformation, no matter the motivation.
Well said. Maintaining a fact-based, impartial approach is essential, especially when it comes to such a politically contentious issue. Reliable sources and official findings should guide our understanding, not unverified claims.
The Capitol riot was a dark chapter in American history, and it’s understandable there are many unanswered questions. However, promoting unverified claims, no matter the intent, risks further dividing the country. We’d do better to focus on the facts established through rigorous official inquiries.
I agree. At this stage, it’s critical we avoid fueling conspiracy theories or sensationalism, and instead seek to understand what truly happened through reliable, impartial sources.
I’m curious to learn more about the investigations into the events of January 6th. Have there been any other official reports or findings that shed light on the role of federal law enforcement that day?
From what I’ve seen, the DOJ inspector general’s report is one of the more comprehensive investigations into this issue. But you raise a good point – it would be helpful to review any other relevant findings to get a fuller picture.
While the events of January 6th were deeply concerning, it’s important we rely on verified facts and official investigations rather than unsubstantiated claims. The DOJ inspector general’s report found no evidence to support the alleged FBI infiltration. We should be wary of attempts to spread misinformation, no matter the source.
Absolutely. Spreading unverified narratives, especially about sensitive matters like this, can be damaging. It’s crucial we stick to the findings of reputable, impartial authorities.
While the events of January 6th were deeply troubling, I’m skeptical of the former president’s latest claims. The DOJ’s findings seem clear – there’s no credible evidence of FBI infiltration or orchestration of the attack. We should be cautious about accepting unverified narratives, no matter the source.
Absolutely. Promoting unsubstantiated theories, especially around such a sensitive and politically charged issue, can be extremely damaging. It’s crucial we rely on the conclusions of official investigations, not unfounded claims.