Listen to the article
Immigration officials opened fire on a woman in Minneapolis last week, triggering days of unrest and forcing her grieving family to defend her reputation against a flood of false information circulating online.
Renee Good, 37, was fatally shot by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent on January 7 after reportedly clipping the officer with her SUV. Her death has become a flashpoint in the contentious national debate over immigration enforcement policies.
“You never think the passing of a loved one will be high profile… or a massively divisive, political topic,” wrote Morgan Fletcher, Good’s sister-in-law, in an emotional Facebook post on Monday. “We are grieving. Heavily. And yes, we see everyone’s posts and comments. Some in support but also, the nasty ones ripping apart our beautiful and beloved Renee.”
Fletcher specifically addressed widely circulated claims about Good’s supposed criminal background. “We’ve seen the false claims and the wrong Renee Good’s info being posted (criminal history? She didn’t have one),” she wrote.
An investigation by The Post found no evidence of any criminal record for Good, despite viral social media posts featuring what appears to be an AI-generated mugshot alongside fabricated charges dating back to 2022.
Good’s killing occurred during what the Department of Homeland Security has described as the largest immigration enforcement operation in the region’s history, with approximately 2,000 federal agents deployed to the Twin Cities area. The timing has intensified the community’s response to her death.
Since the shooting, Minneapolis has experienced sustained demonstrations, with police estimating “tens of thousands” of participants in rallies and marches protesting ICE’s presence in the city. The protests have occasionally turned volatile, with authorities reporting that demonstrators have thrown projectiles including bottles, rocks, and snowballs at officers.
Tensions escalated Friday night when protesters gathered outside the Canopy Hotel following rumors that ICE agents were staying there. According to Minneapolis police, some among the “several hundred” demonstrators “forced entry into the hotel” through an alleyway entrance. Authorities have made dozens of arrests across the city in connection with the ongoing protests.
Fletcher urged the public to remember the human dimension of the tragedy amid the political firestorm. “No matter where you stand on the issue of ICE or whether or not you think she did or didn’t deserve what happened, please remember she was a human being and she had loved ones… including children who can and will likely see all of these things about their mother… and her wife, whom she loved dearly,” she wrote.
The incident comes at a time of heightened national tension over immigration policy. Under the Biden administration, ICE has faced criticism from both sides of the political spectrum – from immigration advocates who argue enforcement actions are still too harsh, and from conservatives who believe the agency should be conducting more deportations.
Minneapolis, a sanctuary city with policies limiting cooperation between local law enforcement and federal immigration authorities, has long grappled with these tensions. The current surge of federal agents in the area represents an unusual escalation of enforcement activity in a location traditionally resistant to aggressive immigration operations.
As investigations into the circumstances of Good’s death continue, her family’s plea highlights the personal tragedy that exists behind the headlines and political debates that have engulfed the case.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


9 Comments
This is a tragic situation that deserves a thoughtful, fact-based approach. I appreciate the family taking the time to address the false claims circulating. Moving forward, we should focus on understanding the full context and respecting the privacy of those affected.
The family’s response is understandable and appropriate. Spreading unverified claims can cause real harm, and we should be more cautious about jumping to conclusions, especially in such a tragic and politically charged situation.
This is a heartbreaking situation, and the family’s pain is understandable. Their statement highlighting the misinformation is important, as responsible reporting and discourse is crucial in sensitive cases like this.
The family’s statement is an important reminder to be cautious about spreading unverified information, especially regarding sensitive incidents. My condolences to them during this difficult time.
Well said. It’s crucial that we allow the investigation to proceed and refrain from fueling divisive narratives without clear evidence. The family’s grief deserves our compassion, not unfounded speculation.
Tragic situation. The family’s grief is understandable, and they deserve space to mourn without having to defend false information. This highlights the need for caution when sharing unverified claims, especially about sensitive incidents.
Tragic loss of life. I’m glad the family is pushing back against the false claims, as that can only compound their grief. We should wait for the full facts to emerge before drawing conclusions about this incident.
It’s concerning to see the spread of misinformation in such a sensitive case. The family’s statement clarifying the facts is important, and we should be careful about jumping to conclusions without verifying the details.
Absolutely, rushing to share unsubstantiated claims can cause real harm to grieving families. I hope the investigation provides clarity and that the family can find some peace during this difficult time.