Listen to the article
Pennsylvania Lawmakers Push for Stronger False Claims Act to Combat Fraud
Pennsylvania lawmakers are advancing bipartisan legislation that would strengthen the state’s ability to recover taxpayer money lost to fraud, particularly in healthcare and government contracting.
The proposal would enhance Pennsylvania’s limited False Claims Act by giving the state attorney general and private citizens more power to sue entities that knowingly submit false claims to state or local government agencies. Supporters say the reform could recover millions in fraudulently obtained funds while deterring future misconduct.
“This is about protecting taxpayer dollars,” said State Representative Seth Grove, a York County Republican who is sponsoring the bill in the House. “When companies defraud the government, they’re essentially stealing from Pennsylvania citizens.”
Pennsylvania’s current false claims provisions lack the teeth found in federal law and similar statutes in 31 other states. These stronger laws typically allow whistleblowers to file suits on behalf of the government and share in any recovered funds, creating financial incentives for insiders to report fraud.
The federal False Claims Act, originally enacted during the Civil War to combat defense contractor fraud, has become one of the government’s most powerful anti-fraud tools. In fiscal year 2023 alone, the U.S. Department of Justice recovered more than $2.6 billion under the federal act, with healthcare fraud accounting for approximately 90 percent of those recoveries.
Pennsylvania’s proposed legislation would mirror key provisions of the federal law, including triple damages for fraudulent claims and protection for whistleblowers from workplace retaliation. Legal experts say these elements are critical for effective enforcement.
“Without meaningful whistleblower incentives and protections, many fraudulent schemes go undetected,” said Stephen Sheller, a Philadelphia attorney who specializes in whistleblower cases. “Insiders are often in the best position to identify fraud, but they need assurance they won’t lose their livelihoods for coming forward.”
The state Department of Human Services, which administers Pennsylvania’s $35 billion Medicaid program, has expressed support for the measure. Officials estimate that fraud diverts hundreds of millions of dollars annually from legitimate healthcare services for vulnerable populations.
Opponents of the bill, including some healthcare industry groups and the Pennsylvania Chamber of Business and Industry, have raised concerns about potential unintended consequences. They argue that an overly aggressive false claims regime could lead to frivolous lawsuits against businesses that make honest mistakes in complicated billing systems.
“We need to ensure any legislation distinguishes between intentional fraud and inadvertent errors,” said Gene Barr, president of the Pennsylvania Chamber. “Companies shouldn’t face triple damages for good-faith mistakes.”
Supporters counter that the bill specifically requires proof that claims were submitted with knowledge of their falsity, providing protection for honest businesses while targeting bad actors.
The proposed legislation comes as states nationwide face increasing budget pressures and seek tools to maximize recovery of misspent funds. States with robust false claims laws can receive an additional 10 percent of federal recoveries in Medicaid fraud cases that involve both state and federal funds.
Attorney General Michelle Henry has made strengthening the state’s anti-fraud capabilities a priority since taking office. Her office estimates that Pennsylvania could recover an additional $30-50 million annually with an enhanced False Claims Act.
The bill has gained momentum in recent months, attracting support from lawmakers on both sides of the aisle. It has cleared committee hurdles and could receive a full vote in the House this session.
If passed, Pennsylvania would join the growing list of states empowering both government agencies and private citizens to combat fraud against public funds through strengthened false claims legislation.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


16 Comments
I’m curious to see how much potential revenue could be recovered for Pennsylvania through a strengthened false claims act. The millions cited for other states suggests this reform could have a significant financial impact.
Yes, the potential to recover millions in fraudulently obtained funds is a compelling reason to pursue this legislation. It could make a real difference for Pennsylvania’s budget and taxpayers.
While the proposed legislation sounds promising, I wonder how the implementation and enforcement would work in practice. Careful consideration of potential unintended consequences will be key.
That’s a good point. The details around implementation and enforcement will be critical to ensure the reforms achieve the desired outcomes.
It’s good to see Pennsylvania lawmakers pushing for stronger false claims legislation. Protecting taxpayer dollars from fraud is crucial, and giving the state and whistleblowers more power to pursue recoveries could make a big difference.
Absolutely. Enhancing the false claims act is an important step to deter misconduct and ensure government funds are used properly.
As a taxpayer, I’m glad to see lawmakers taking steps to deter fraud and hold bad actors accountable. Ensuring government funds are used appropriately is crucial for maintaining public trust.
Absolutely. Strengthening the false claims act is an important measure to protect taxpayer dollars and promote transparency in government.
I’m curious to learn more about how this reform could impact healthcare and government contracting in Pennsylvania. Deterring fraud through financial incentives for whistleblowers sounds like a smart approach.
Yes, the financial incentives for whistleblowers are key. They can provide valuable information to uncover fraud that may otherwise go undetected.
It’s concerning that Pennsylvania’s current false claims laws lack the teeth of federal and other state statutes. Strengthening the ability to recover fraudulently obtained funds could make a real difference for taxpayers.
Agreed. Closing this gap and aligning with the federal False Claims Act seems like an important reform to consider.
This is an important issue that deserves bipartisan support. Protecting taxpayer funds from fraud should be a priority, regardless of political affiliation.
Exactly. Tackling fraud and misuse of government funds is a non-partisan issue that benefits all citizens.
The comparison to the federal False Claims Act and stronger laws in other states highlights the need for Pennsylvania to modernize its own legislation. Aligning with these more robust frameworks could make a real difference.
Agreed. Bringing Pennsylvania’s false claims act up to par with federal and other state laws is an important step forward.