Listen to the article
Federal DEI Certification Requirements Trigger New False Claims Act Risks for Institutions
The federal landscape for government contractors and grant recipients has undergone significant transformation since January 2025, with new compliance obligations creating potential legal exposure under the False Claims Act (FCA). Executive Order 14173, titled “Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity,” has established extensive requirements that are now being enforced through the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Fraud Initiative.
The initiative, launched in May 2025, represents a strategic shift in how the federal government approaches diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs among organizations receiving federal funds. Several major corporations have reportedly received civil investigative demands (CIDs) requesting documentation and information about their workplace DEI initiatives, signaling active enforcement.
The stakes are substantial, with the DOJ recovering a record $6.8 billion in False Claims Act cases in 2025 alone. This unprecedented figure demonstrates both the government’s enforcement capacity and its willingness to aggressively pursue potential violations.
Legal challenges to these certification requirements have yielded mixed results. While some litigants have successfully contested federal DEI certifications, particularly in higher education, the Fourth Circuit recently upheld the Executive Order’s certification requirement in a significant ruling. This conflicting legal landscape has created uncertainty for organizations that have signed or are considering signing these certification provisions.
The central question for many institutions remains whether these certifications are enforceable and how serious the False Claims Act threat may be. Organizations must navigate a complex enforcement environment while assessing their compliance status and potential exposure.
Legal experts are particularly focused on the DOJ’s enforcement strategy, including what recent civil investigative demands and investigations reveal about the department’s legal theories and priorities. The litigation landscape continues to evolve with key rulings such as NADOHE v. Trump and various constitutional challenges to certification requirements.
Adding further complexity, the General Services Administration (GSA) has proposed new certification requirements for SAM.gov, the system through which entities register to do business with the federal government. These pending requirements may impose additional compliance burdens on federal contractors and grant recipients.
The materiality standard established in Universal Health Services v. United States ex rel. Escobar remains crucial for understanding how DEI-related claims might be evaluated under the False Claims Act. This Supreme Court precedent guides how courts determine whether misrepresentations are material to government payment decisions.
For institutions seeking to mitigate risk, experts recommend comprehensive assessment of DEI programs, thorough documentation of good-faith compliance efforts, proper handling of internal complaints or reports, and careful response strategies for government inquiries.
Higher education institutions face particular scrutiny, as they often receive substantial federal funding through research grants, student financial aid, and other programs. The vacatur of Title VI certification requirements has created additional complexity for academic institutions attempting to navigate compliance obligations.
The heightened enforcement environment comes amid ongoing national debates about the role of DEI initiatives in both public and private organizations. These developments represent a significant shift in how the federal government approaches contractor compliance beyond traditional areas like procurement integrity and healthcare fraud.
Organizations doing business with the federal government must now carefully balance compliance with existing DEI commitments, evolving federal certification requirements, and the risk of False Claims Act liability. With billions in potential damages at stake, institutions are increasingly seeking legal guidance to navigate this rapidly changing landscape.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
12 Comments
I’m curious to see how this enforcement push around DEI certification impacts the recruitment and retention of diverse talent in the mining, metals, and energy sectors. Transparent and equitable practices will be essential.
That’s a good question. Improved DEI efforts could help those industries attract a more diverse workforce, but enforcement actions may also create a compliance burden for some companies.
The False Claims Act enforcement related to DEI certifications seems like a necessary step to hold organizations accountable and drive meaningful progress on diversity, equity, and inclusion.
This is an important development for the mining and energy sectors, which have historically struggled with diversity challenges. Proactive compliance with the new DEI certification requirements will be critical.
Good point. Those industries will need to closely review their hiring, promotion, and reporting practices to ensure they meet the federal standards and avoid FCA liability.
This news highlights the growing importance of DEI in the federal contracting and grant space. Companies will need to carefully review their practices and reporting to avoid potential FCA liability.
Absolutely. The stakes are high, so organizations can’t afford to be complacent when it comes to DEI compliance and documentation.
The $6.8 billion in False Claims Act recoveries in 2025 is a staggering figure. It really underscores the government’s determination to crack down on any misrepresentation or non-compliance around DEI initiatives.
That’s an eye-opening statistic. Companies better make sure their DEI practices and reporting are airtight to avoid significant legal and financial penalties.
Interesting to see the government taking a stronger stance on DEI compliance for federal contractors and grant recipients. It will be important for organizations to closely review their practices and documentation to avoid potential False Claims Act exposure.
Agreed. The DOJ’s enforcement actions signal they are serious about holding organizations accountable for accurate DEI reporting and certifications.
The DOJ’s Civil Rights Fraud Initiative signals a shift in how the government approaches DEI compliance. Companies should expect heightened scrutiny and take steps to strengthen their DEI programs and documentation.