Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

A Delaware-based company operating in New Jersey has agreed to a multimillion-dollar settlement with federal authorities after allegedly misusing pandemic relief funds intended for struggling small businesses.

Protech Powder Coatings, Inc. will pay nearly $2.9 million to resolve claims that it violated the False Claims Act by fraudulently obtaining and receiving forgiveness for a Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loan, according to an announcement from Senior Counsel Philip Lamparello of the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

Federal officials contend that Protech Powder, a subsidiary of the Canadian-based Protech Group, applied for and received a second-draw PPP loan in March 2021, later securing loan forgiveness in January 2022. The total amount, including interest, came to approximately $2.02 million.

The government’s investigation revealed that the company allegedly made false certifications regarding its eligibility for the funds. Specifically, authorities claim Protech exceeded the employee size limits established under the program when counting its affiliated companies—a critical requirement for PPP qualification.

“The company knowingly made false statements in its PPP application,” said a government representative familiar with the case. These misrepresentations not only resulted in Protech receiving funds it wasn’t entitled to but also caused the government to pay roughly $60,000 in processing fees to the lender who handled the application.

Under the settlement terms announced this week, Protech will repay $2,907,643 to the federal government—representing both the original loan amount and additional penalties for the alleged fraud.

The case originated from a whistleblower complaint filed under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act, which allows private citizens to sue on behalf of the government and share in any recovery. The unnamed whistleblower who brought the allegations to light will receive approximately $290,764 as their share of the settlement.

The PPP program was created by Congress in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic as part of the CARES Act in March 2020. It represented one of the federal government’s primary economic responses to the crisis, offering potentially forgivable loans to help businesses maintain their workforce during the unprecedented economic shutdown.

To qualify for these loans, businesses were required to certify their eligibility according to specific criteria, including size limitations and demonstration of economic necessity. Second-draw PPP loans, which became available in 2021, had even stricter requirements designed to target businesses that continued to struggle as the pandemic persisted.

The Protech case highlights the federal government’s ongoing efforts to reclaim improperly obtained pandemic relief funds. Since the creation of COVID-19 relief programs, the Justice Department has prioritized identifying and prosecuting fraud cases involving pandemic assistance.

“When companies misrepresent their eligibility for relief programs like the PPP, they divert critical resources away from legitimate small businesses that were struggling to survive during an unprecedented crisis,” noted a federal prosecutor involved in COVID-19 fraud enforcement.

The settlement with Protech Powder Coatings comes amid a broader crackdown on pandemic relief fraud. The Small Business Administration’s Office of Inspector General has identified billions of dollars in potentially fraudulent loans across various COVID-19 relief programs, spurring increased investigation and enforcement actions.

For Fairfield, New Jersey, where Protech maintains operations, the case serves as a reminder of the scrutiny being applied to pandemic-era business assistance programs as federal authorities work to ensure that limited relief funds reached their intended recipients.

Neither Protech Powder Coatings nor its parent company provided immediate comment on the settlement agreement.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

18 Comments

  1. Michael Johnson on

    It’s unfortunate to see a company abuse a program intended to support small businesses struggling during the pandemic. Hopefully this settlement serves as a deterrent to others who may be tempted to misuse PPP funds.

    • Oliver Thompson on

      Absolutely. Fraudulent behavior like this undermines the purpose of the PPP and takes away resources from businesses that genuinely needed the assistance.

  2. This highlights the need for close scrutiny of PPP loan applications to prevent abuse. While the program was well-intentioned, there were clearly some bad actors trying to game the system for their own gain.

    • Agreed. Robust oversight and enforcement are crucial to protect the integrity of relief programs like the PPP.

  3. I’m curious to learn more about the specifics of how Protech Powder Coatings misrepresented its employee count. Was it a simple miscalculation or a deliberate attempt to circumvent the eligibility requirements?

    • Good question. The article suggests it was a deliberate misrepresentation, with the company allegedly counting affiliated companies to exceed the employee size limits. Hopefully the investigation uncovered the full extent of the fraud.

  4. Noah Hernandez on

    This case highlights the importance of closely monitoring PPP loan applications and forgiveness requests to identify any potential misuse of funds. Vigilance is key to maintaining the effectiveness of these relief programs.

    • Absolutely. Ongoing oversight and auditing are essential to ensure the intended beneficiaries of these programs are the ones receiving the assistance.

  5. Olivia Williams on

    The $2.9 million settlement seems like a significant penalty for Protech Powder Coatings. Hopefully this sends a strong message that PPP loan fraud will be aggressively pursued and penalized.

  6. This case demonstrates the importance of transparency and accountability in the administration of government relief programs. Rigorous auditing and enforcement are essential to prevent abuse and protect taxpayer funds.

    • Well said. Maintaining public trust in these programs requires diligent oversight and swift action against any fraudulent activity.

  7. Interesting case of PPP loan fraud. Seems Protech Powder Coatings misrepresented its employee count to obtain funds it wasn’t eligible for. Glad to see the government taking action to recover the misused pandemic relief money.

    • Yes, it’s important to ensure PPP funds are used as intended to support struggling small businesses, not exploited through fraudulent means.

  8. Elijah Martinez on

    This case highlights the importance of carefully reviewing PPP loan applications to ensure the funds are distributed to the intended recipients. Kudos to the federal authorities for uncovering and pursuing this fraud.

    • Jennifer S. Jackson on

      Agreed. Oversight and enforcement are crucial to maintaining the integrity of relief programs like the PPP.

  9. William Garcia on

    The $2.9 million settlement seems like a significant penalty, but perhaps necessary to send a strong message that PPP loan fraud will be taken seriously. Protecting the integrity of relief programs is crucial.

    • Agreed. Robust enforcement and substantial penalties are needed to deter future attempts at exploiting these programs for personal gain.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.