Listen to the article
President Donald Trump has revived a peculiar claim that has become a recurring theme in his political rhetoric: the assertion that Americans need to show identification to purchase groceries.
During a breakfast meeting with Republican senators, Trump stated, “All we need is a voter ID. You walk into a grocery store, you need to show ID. You walk into a gas station, you show ID.” This declaration marks at least the fourth time since 2018 that the former president has made this particular claim, which continues to circulate despite being demonstrably false.
The reality is straightforward: Americans do not typically need to present identification when purchasing groceries or fuel. While there are specific circumstances that require ID verification—such as buying alcohol, tobacco products, certain medications, or when paying by check—these represent exceptions rather than the standard practice in retail settings.
Each day, millions of Americans complete grocery transactions without ever being asked to prove their identity. Similarly, consumers routinely purchase gasoline without showing identification or even interacting with store personnel, particularly at self-service pumps which have become increasingly common across the country.
Trump’s resurrection of this claim appears strategically timed, coming just after Republican defeats in recent elections and amid ongoing debates about voting security measures. The statement emerged as part of a broader discussion about voter identification requirements, a cause Trump has championed throughout both his presidencies and campaign periods.
During the same conversation, Trump continued his criticism of mail-in voting, claiming, “If you have mail-in ballots, elections will be automatically corrupted.” This statement aligns with his long-standing opposition to expanded mail voting access, despite research that has consistently found mail ballot fraud to be exceedingly rare in American elections.
Trump’s reference to mail voting corruption stands in contrast to the evolving positions of other political figures, including the late former President Jimmy Carter. While a 2005 commission chaired by Carter did identify potential vulnerabilities in absentee voting systems, Carter himself later became an advocate for mail-in ballots. Before his death earlier this year, Carter had personally used mail-in voting for more than five years and publicly expressed confidence in the security of such systems.
The persistent repetition of the grocery ID claim, despite its obvious inaccuracy, demonstrates how certain talking points can become embedded in political discourse regardless of their factual basis. First emerging in 2018 during Trump’s push for stricter voter identification laws, the claim reappeared in 2019 and again throughout the 2024 campaign cycle.
The timing of Trump’s latest iteration of this claim is notable, coming immediately after electoral setbacks for Republicans. Political analysts suggest such assertions may serve to reinforce narratives about electoral security concerns among his base, even when the comparative examples used don’t withstand factual scrutiny.
While legitimate debates exist regarding the appropriate balance between voting access and security measures, the comparison to everyday grocery shopping continues to confuse rather than clarify these important policy discussions. Retail industry representatives have repeatedly confirmed that standard grocery purchases do not require identification under normal circumstances.
As political discourse around election integrity continues to evolve, fact-checkers and journalists face the ongoing challenge of addressing claims that persist despite being repeatedly debunked, particularly when they come from influential political figures with substantial public platforms.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
16 Comments
The president’s claim about ID requirements for grocery and gas purchases is simply not accurate. While there may be specific situations where ID is needed, the general practice does not involve showing identification for these routine transactions. Fact-checking helps provide the correct information.
Exactly. Spreading misinformation, even unintentionally, can have serious consequences. It’s important for leaders to base their statements on facts, not fiction, in order to maintain public trust and provide reliable information.
It’s concerning to see the president continue to make this false claim about ID requirements for everyday purchases. The reality is that Americans can generally buy groceries and gas without showing identification, with a few exceptions. Fact-checking is crucial.
I agree. Repeating demonstrably false information, even after it has been debunked, undermines the credibility of public figures and erodes trust in institutions. Promoting accurate, evidence-based information should be a priority.
It’s concerning to see the president making false claims about ID requirements for routine purchases. Grocery stores and gas stations generally don’t require ID unless for age-restricted items. Spreading misinformation undermines public trust.
I agree, honesty and accuracy in public statements are crucial, especially from high-profile leaders. Fact-checking helps counter the spread of disinformation.
I’m disappointed to see the president continue to make this false claim about ID requirements for grocery and gas purchases. The reality is that Americans can generally complete these everyday transactions without showing identification, with a few exceptions. Fact-checking is crucial for countering the spread of misinformation.
I agree wholeheartedly. Promoting accurate, evidence-based information should be a top priority for public figures, especially those in positions of leadership. Fact-checking helps ensure that the public receives truthful and reliable information.
While there may be specific situations where ID is required, the president’s claim that Americans generally need to show ID for grocery and gas purchases is simply inaccurate. Fact-checking helps counter the spread of misinformation.
Absolutely. Maintaining public trust requires leaders to be truthful and accountable, not make unsubstantiated claims. Fact-checking is an important tool for ensuring accuracy in public discourse.
This claim about ID requirements for routine purchases seems to be another case of the president spreading misinformation. The reality is that Americans don’t typically need to show ID for basic grocery or gas transactions.
Agreed. Promoting false narratives, even unintentionally, can undermine public trust and lead to confusion. Responsible leaders should prioritize factual, evidence-based information.
While some special purchases may require ID, the claim that Americans need to show ID for basic grocery and gas transactions is simply untrue. Spreading this kind of false narrative is problematic.
Absolutely. It’s important to rely on factual information from credible sources, not unsubstantiated claims. Promoting misinformation can have serious consequences.
I’m curious why the president keeps repeating this particular false claim. Grocery and gas purchases generally don’t require ID, with a few exceptions. Fact-checking helps provide the accurate information.
Good point. Repeating demonstrably false claims, even after they’ve been debunked, is concerning. It’s vital that public figures base their statements on facts, not fiction.