Listen to the article
In a tense Oval Office meeting that has drawn international attention, U.S. President Donald Trump leveled numerous false claims about South Africa’s white minority during talks with President Cyril Ramaphosa, repeatedly interrupting his counterpart’s attempts to correct the record.
The contentious meeting on Wednesday saw Trump present a video compilation featuring years-old inflammatory speeches by South African politicians that have been circulating in far-right social media circles. Throughout the exchange, Trump made several assertions about the treatment of white South Africans that stand in stark contrast to documented evidence.
Central to Trump’s claims was the allegation of a “genocide” targeting white farmers in South Africa—a conspiracy theory that has persisted in fringe white South African groups since the end of apartheid in 1994 and gained traction in global far-right communities over the past decade. Tech billionaire Elon Musk, a South African-born Trump ally, has been a vocal proponent of this theory.
Proponents of this narrative point to murders of white farmers in remote areas as evidence of politically orchestrated ethnic cleansing rather than conventional crime. They accuse the government of either encouraging these killings or deliberately ignoring them—allegations South African authorities vehemently deny.
The data, however, tells a different story. In a nation with one of the world’s highest murder rates—approximately 72 daily killings in a population of 60 million—the overwhelming majority of victims are Black South Africans. Of the 26,232 murders recorded by South African police in 2024, only 44 were connected to farming communities, with just eight victims being farmers.
Even statistics compiled by white farmers themselves contradict the genocide narrative. Afrikaner farmers’ union TLU-SA has documented 1,363 white farmer murders since 1990—averaging about 40 annually and representing less than 1% of total murders in the country. Earlier this year, the Western Cape High Court explicitly ruled that claims of white genocide were “clearly imagined and not real” in a case involving donations to a white supremacist organization.
Trump also falsely claimed that the South African government is forcibly seizing land from white farmers without compensation. While South Africa does have policies aimed at addressing land ownership inequalities stemming from apartheid and colonialism, no land has been expropriated. Instead, the government has attempted to encourage voluntary sales by white landowners.
These efforts have yielded limited results. White South Africans, who comprise less than 8% of the population, still control approximately three-quarters of privately-owned farmland, while Black South Africans, who make up 80% of the population, own just 4%. A law signed by Ramaphosa in January does allow for land expropriation “in the public interest” in exceptional cases without compensation, but it mandates that authorities first attempt to reach an agreement with landowners. To date, this legislation has not been implemented.
During the meeting, Trump also mischaracterized the historical liberation song “Kill the Boer” as a literal call for violence against Afrikaners. This chant, seen in one video clip featuring opposition leader Julius Malema of the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), has been ruled by three South African courts not to constitute hate speech, as it represents historical resistance against apartheid rather than an incitement to violence.
“We didn’t know that we would form part of those theatrics to try and justify the existence of a white genocide that is obviously not occurring in South Africa,” EFF spokesperson Sinawo Thambo told Reuters after the meeting. The party clarified that the song “expresses the desire to destroy the system of white minority control over the resources of South Africa.”
Trump’s presentation included several blatant misrepresentations. He showed footage of white crosses along a highway, claiming they marked “burial sites” for white farmers, when in fact they were symbolic markers placed during a 2020 protest against farm murders. He also displayed an image purportedly showing buried white farmers that was actually Reuters footage of humanitarian workers burying bodies in Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo, following battles against Rwanda-backed rebels earlier this year.
The meeting highlights growing international concern about the spread of misinformation regarding South Africa’s complex social and political landscape, particularly as the country continues to work through the legacy of apartheid nearly three decades after its official end.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


14 Comments
This article provides a helpful reality check on the president’s claims. While any loss of life is tragic, the ‘white genocide’ narrative appears to be a misleading conspiracy theory not backed by credible data. It’s important that our leaders base their statements on facts, not inflammatory rhetoric.
Well said. Responsible leadership requires a commitment to truth and accuracy, not the exploitation of fears or divisions. I’m glad to see this issue being scrutinized thoroughly and objectively.
I appreciate the fact-checking here. It’s important to scrutinize claims, especially those made by public figures, to ensure we have an accurate understanding of complex geopolitical issues. While any violence is concerning, the ‘white genocide’ theory seems to be an exaggeration not supported by reliable data.
I agree, it’s vital that we rely on reputable, impartial sources when assessing sensitive topics like this. Spreading unsubstantiated narratives, no matter the intent, can have harmful real-world consequences. A measured, evidence-based approach is crucial.
This appears to be another case of the president making unfounded claims about a sensitive political issue. While any loss of life is tragic, the data simply does not support accusations of a targeted ‘white genocide’ in South Africa. We should be cautious about spreading unverified narratives, especially those with racial undertones.
Absolutely. It’s vital that our leaders base their statements on credible, impartial sources rather than inflammatory rhetoric or conspiracy theories. Responsible governance requires a commitment to truth and accuracy, not the exploitation of fears or divisions.
It’s concerning to see the president make such sweeping claims without firm evidence. While the situation in South Africa is complex, the ‘white genocide’ theory seems to be an oversimplification not supported by reliable data. We should be wary of politicians using charged language for political gain.
I agree completely. It’s crucial that our leaders base their statements on rigorous research and verifiable facts, not unsubstantiated rumors or partisan agendas. Responsible governance requires an objective, evidence-based approach, not the amplification of divisive rhetoric.
Hmm, it’s concerning to see the president make such strong claims without solid evidence. While any violence is worrying, the ‘white genocide’ narrative seems to be a far-right conspiracy theory that doesn’t align with the data. We should be wary of politicians using divisive rhetoric for political gain.
I agree, it’s crucial that we rely on reputable, impartial sources when assessing sensitive topics like this. Spreading unsubstantiated narratives, no matter the intent, can have harmful real-world consequences. A measured, evidence-based approach is crucial for our leaders.
Hmm, it’s concerning to see the president make such strong claims without solid evidence. While any violence is worrying, the ‘white genocide’ narrative seems to be a far-right conspiracy theory that doesn’t align with the data. We should be wary of politicians using divisive rhetoric for political gain.
Absolutely. It’s crucial that our leaders base their statements on rigorous research and verifiable facts, not rumors or partisan agendas. Stoking racial tensions is irresponsible and counterproductive.
This appears to be another case of the president making unfounded claims about a sensitive political issue. While any loss of life is tragic, the data simply does not support accusations of a targeted ‘white genocide’ in South Africa. We should be cautious about spreading unverified narratives, especially those with racial undertones.
I agree, it’s important to rely on credible, fact-based reporting rather than inflammatory rhetoric or conspiracy theories, no matter the source. Responsible leaders should focus on solutions, not exploiting divisions.