Listen to the article
Trump Named in Epstein Files as DOJ Releases Thousands of Documents
A significant cache of government documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, released Tuesday by the Department of Justice, contains an unverified allegation that former President Donald Trump raped a woman in the 1990s. The DOJ swiftly dismissed the claims as “untrue and sensationalist.”
The release comprises nearly 30,000 pages of materials now accessible on the Justice Department’s official website, disclosed in accordance with the recently enacted Epstein Files Transparency Act. Ironically, Trump himself signed this legislation last month despite previously opposing the release of such records.
Among the documents is an FBI intake report dated October 27, 2020, detailing a tip from a former limousine driver who claimed to have overheard a disturbing phone conversation in 1995 involving Trump and Epstein. According to the report, an unnamed woman allegedly told the driver “he raped me,” referring to Trump alongside Epstein.
The driver’s account further claims the woman later reported the incident to police before being found dead by suicide in January 2000. The file contains heavy redactions, and investigators appear to have made no determinations regarding the credibility of these allegations.
The Department of Justice addressed these claims directly in a statement on social media platform X, noting that some documents contain “untrue and sensationalist claims made against President Trump that were submitted to the FBI right before the 2020 election.”
“To be clear: the claims are unfounded and false, and if they had a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponized against President Trump already,” the statement continued, emphasizing that the department’s legal obligation to release the records does not validate the allegations themselves.
Trump has consistently denied any wrongdoing connected to Epstein. In recent public statements, he characterized the focus on the Epstein case as a political distraction orchestrated by Democrats, asserting that he severed ties with Epstein long before the financier’s 2019 arrest on sex trafficking charges.
Beyond the unverified rape allegation, the document release revealed other connections between Trump and Epstein. Internal emails indicate Trump traveled on Epstein’s private jet during the 1990s more frequently than previously known—at least eight flights between 1993 and 1996. While Trump’s association with Epstein during this period is well-documented through photographs and social events, appearance in flight logs does not itself constitute evidence of illegal activity.
The Justice Department continues to face pressure from Democratic lawmakers to release all Epstein-related files. Advocates for the Transparency Act argue that the public deserves access to government records, even when they contain unsubstantiated claims.
This latest document release follows controversy surrounding an earlier batch of Epstein records, some of which were temporarily removed from the DOJ’s online portal due to concerns about victim privacy. Those files were later restored after officials determined no victims were identifiable in the disputed photographs.
The Epstein Files Transparency Act represents an unusual bipartisan effort to shed light on the late financier’s criminal activities and connections. Epstein died in prison in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges, with his death ruled a suicide—though questions about the circumstances have persisted.
As more documents continue to be released, the full scope of Epstein’s network and activities remains a subject of intense public interest, particularly regarding his connections to powerful figures in politics, business, and society.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
16 Comments
While the Epstein case raises many disturbing questions, we must be wary of unsubstantiated claims, no matter who they target. I’m glad the DOJ is taking the time to thoroughly review the documents and respond accordingly.
Agreed. Rushing to judgment or spreading unverified information does more harm than good. I look forward to seeing the DOJ’s comprehensive analysis, which should be the basis for any conclusions drawn about these allegations.
While the Epstein case raises many disturbing questions, we should be cautious about unsubstantiated claims, no matter who they target. The DOJ’s response will be crucial in assessing the credibility of these allegations.
Absolutely. These high-profile cases tend to attract a lot of speculation and misinformation. I hope the DOJ’s full review of the documents provides clarity and upholds the principles of due process.
The release of these Epstein-related documents is certainly significant, but we must rely on verifiable facts, not hearsay, when it comes to such serious allegations. I’ll be interested to see the DOJ’s comprehensive analysis.
Well said. Given the sensitivity and complexity of this case, a measured and evidence-based approach is essential. Rushing to judgment helps no one.
The Epstein case has been shrouded in controversy and misinformation from the start. I’m glad the DOJ is taking a careful, measured approach in assessing these latest claims. Transparency is crucial, but so is due diligence.
Well said. These high-profile cases tend to attract a lot of sensationalism and conspiracy theories. I hope the DOJ’s review will provide the public with a clear, fact-based understanding of the situation.
The release of these Epstein-related documents is certainly significant, but we must rely on verifiable facts, not hearsay, when it comes to such serious allegations. I’ll be interested to see the DOJ’s thorough assessment of the materials.
Well said. Given the sensitivity and complexity of this case, a measured and evidence-based approach is essential. I hope the DOJ’s review will provide much-needed clarity and help uphold the principles of due process.
While these newly released documents raise troubling questions, we must be cautious about unsubstantiated allegations, no matter who they target. I hope the DOJ’s comprehensive analysis will provide much-needed clarity.
Absolutely. In cases like this, it’s essential to rely on verifiable facts rather than hearsay or speculation. I’m glad the DOJ is taking the time to thoroughly review the materials and respond accordingly.
Transparency is crucial, but these claims require rigorous vetting. I’m glad the DOJ is taking the time to thoroughly review the documents and respond accordingly. Uncovering the truth should be the top priority.
Agreed. With such high-profile individuals involved, it’s critical that the investigation be conducted with the utmost care and objectivity. I look forward to learning more as the DOJ’s review progresses.
This report seems highly dubious and lacking in credible evidence. I’d wait for the DOJ’s full response before jumping to conclusions about these unverified allegations.
Agreed. The DOJ’s swift dismissal of these claims as “untrue and sensationalist” is telling. More transparency is needed, but knee-jerk reactions are unwarranted.