Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Armenia Battles Wave of Disinformation as Elections Approach

As Armenia’s parliamentary elections draw closer, the country is experiencing an intensified campaign of disinformation targeting government officials and institutions. Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan’s office has been regularly issuing alerts about false claims circulating online, with his press secretary, Nazeli Baghdasaryan, working overtime to counter these narratives.

In the most recent incident, Baghdasaryan denounced a fabricated publication alleging that Pashinyan and several high-ranking officials were involved in organ trafficking. “I consider it necessary to clearly state that this publication is disinformation and should be regarded as another manifestation of hybrid information actions,” she stated, emphatically rejecting the accusations.

According to an investigation by the Armenian fact-checking platform CivilNet, these disinformation campaigns follow a recognizable pattern. False claims typically first emerge on social media, often posted by anonymous users or through dormant accounts that suddenly spring back to life. Russian-language Telegram channels frequently serve as amplifiers, circulating doctored images purporting to be front pages of respected international publications.

Baghdasaryan noted that those behind these campaigns deliberately select emotionally charged topics to manipulate public opinion. “Such a methodology is one of the common tools of information manipulation. It uses topics to which society is especially sensitive in order to undermine trust in state institutions and their leaders,” she explained.

The press secretary described how these fabricated stories typically spread: first appearing on social media, then picked up by Azerbaijani media outlets, and finally amplified by certain political factions within Armenia. This distribution chain reveals a coordinated effort to influence the Armenian information space ahead of crucial elections.

One notable example investigated by CivilNet involved a false narrative that emerged during Pashinyan’s visit to France. A Telegram channel called “Odessa Za Pobedu!” claimed that French President Emmanuel Macron was urging Pashinyan to confront Russia, with the post stating: “Macron guarantees Pashinyan support after the elections if he starts a war with Russia.”

To lend credibility to these claims, the posts included images purporting to be front pages of prominent French publications like Libération, Le Parisien, and ActuJ. CivilNet’s fact-checkers quickly determined that all these images were fabricated. The actual front pages from the dates in question featured entirely different stories – Libération showed US President Donald Trump, while Le Parisien focused on rising fuel prices.

In another case, a video circulating on X (formerly Twitter) alleged a “secret Macron-Pashinyan deal” in which Armenian political consultants supposedly traveled to France to learn vote manipulation techniques. The video bore the logo of NewsGuard, a respected US fact-checking organization, in an apparent attempt to establish legitimacy.

CivilNet’s investigation revealed that the account that first shared this video, belonging to a user named Jocelyn McMorrow, had been dormant since 2013 before suddenly becoming active again on March 9, 2026. “A sudden reactivation of an account after a long period of inactivity often suggests that it may have been repurposed or taken over for use in information campaigns,” the fact-checkers explained.

The journalists also found similarities between these tactics and a disinformation strategy known as “Matryoshka,” where false materials first appear on social media before being amplified by coordinated networks of accounts and channels.

The timing of these disinformation efforts appears strategically aligned with Armenia’s electoral calendar, suggesting a concerted attempt to influence voter sentiment and potentially destabilize the political landscape. The campaigns also come amid evolving geopolitical tensions in the South Caucasus region, with Armenia navigating complex relationships with Russia, the European Union, and regional neighbors.

As election day approaches, Armenian authorities and independent media organizations continue to monitor and expose these disinformation efforts, highlighting the increasingly sophisticated nature of information warfare in the digital age.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

8 Comments

  1. William V. Garcia on

    The prevalence of disinformation campaigns is a worrying trend that threatens the integrity of the democratic process. Kudos to the Armenian government for taking a proactive stance in addressing this issue and working to protect the country’s media landscape.

    • Olivia Hernandez on

      I agree, it’s essential that governments remain vigilant and work closely with media organizations and civil society to combat the spread of false narratives. Fact-checking and public education initiatives are important tools in this fight.

  2. Olivia Lopez on

    Disinformation campaigns targeting media are a concerning trend. It’s crucial that governments and citizens remain vigilant against the spread of false narratives, especially ahead of elections. Fact-checking organizations play a vital role in countering these malicious efforts.

    • William Williams on

      You’re absolutely right. Disinformation can undermine public trust and the democratic process. It’s encouraging to see the Armenian government taking steps to address this issue proactively.

  3. James R. White on

    Disturbing to see disinformation campaigns targeting the Armenian media and government. Transparent and accountable governance is crucial, and I hope the authorities can effectively counter these malicious efforts to undermine public trust.

  4. Ava R. Lopez on

    This report highlights the growing challenge of combating online disinformation, particularly in the lead-up to elections. Increased coordination between media, authorities, and civil society will be key to protecting the integrity of the democratic discourse.

    • Lucas Martin on

      I agree, a multi-stakeholder approach is essential. Fact-checking initiatives and public awareness campaigns can help mitigate the spread of false narratives and maintain an informed electorate.

  5. James Hernandez on

    This report highlights the complex challenge of combating disinformation, especially in the context of elections. I hope the Armenian authorities can continue to effectively counter these malicious efforts and maintain public trust in democratic institutions.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.