Listen to the article
The Aam Aadmi Party’s “Government at Your Doorstep” campaign, recently launched with much fanfare in Ludhiana by Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann, has quickly descended into a public relations debacle as citizens discover significant discrepancies between promises and reality.
The initiative, intended to showcase administrative efficiency by bringing government services directly to citizens’ homes, is instead facing widespread ridicule across social media platforms, with critics dubbing it “Jhoot [Lies] at Your Doorstep.”
At the high-profile launch event, Kejriwal made bold claims about 24-hour accessibility, telling attendees they could “call 1076 anytime — even at 10 PM” for services like driving licenses. He emphasized that government staff would visit homes with printing equipment to complete documentation on the spot. The symbolic locking of an RTO office during the event was meant to represent the shift to home delivery of services.
However, citizens attempting to access these services quickly encountered a different reality. Calls to the advertised helpline revealed that services operate strictly between 9 AM and 5 PM, with two defined working slots. Staff at Sewa Kendras explicitly denied accepting appointments after regular business hours, directly contradicting Kejriwal’s public statements.
This discrepancy has fueled public skepticism, but it represents only one of several controversies surrounding the AAP leadership’s recent claims.
During a speech in Surat, Gujarat, Kejriwal stated that 23 Punjab districts had been devastated by floods and claimed the state government had already transferred compensation of ₹50,000 per hectare to affected farmers within a month. Official records, however, show only 12 districts suffered flooding, and contrary to the claim of swift compensation, most farmers report receiving nothing.
“Not a single rupee has been credited so far,” said a farmer from Patiala who, like many others, is struggling to reclaim fields covered in sand deposits. “We were promised quick help, but we are on our own again.”
This situation is particularly damaging to Mann’s credibility, as he had frequently criticized previous Punjab administrations for their neglect of farmers before taking office. Videos of his past promises to compensate not only for crop losses but even for “hens and goats” are now circulating widely on social media, accompanied by memes highlighting the gap between rhetoric and action.
The government had announced compensation of ₹20,000 per acre for crop loss, with Mann personally assuring payments would be made before Diwali. However, the girdawari (field assessment) process remains incomplete in many areas, leaving farmers to pool their resources to restore their land without government assistance.
The timing couldn’t be worse for the AAP government in Punjab, which is already facing scrutiny following the CBI’s arrest of Punjab Police DIG Harcharan Singh Bhullar on corruption charges. Despite Mann’s frequent emphasis on “zero tolerance towards corruption,” his silence on this high-profile case has drawn sharp criticism from opposition parties and citizens alike.
Both leaders have built their political reputations on promises of honesty, transparency, and efficiency in governance — stark contrasts to traditional political parties. Mann regularly makes sweeping claims about transforming Punjab’s education and healthcare systems, but growing evidence suggests many of these statements are exaggerated or misleading.
The public response has been swift and unforgiving. Social media platforms are now flooded with videos, memes, and parody reels mocking the two leaders and their campaign promises. For a party that rose to prominence by positioning itself as a clean alternative to establishment politics, this crisis of credibility threatens to undermine its core appeal.
Political analysts note that while the AAP has excelled at campaign messaging and public relations in the past, the growing gap between promises and delivery may prove difficult to overcome, particularly as citizens become more skeptical of government announcements that aren’t backed by tangible results.
Verify This Yourself
Use these professional tools to fact-check and investigate claims independently
Reverse Image Search
Check if this image has been used elsewhere or in different contexts
Ask Our AI About This Claim
Get instant answers with web-powered AI analysis
Related Fact-Checks
See what other fact-checkers have said about similar claims
Want More Verification Tools?
Access our full suite of professional disinformation monitoring and investigation tools


14 Comments
It’s concerning to see this kind of gap between rhetoric and reality, especially when it comes to public services. The 24/7 accessibility claims seem completely at odds with the actual 9-5 business hours. I hope this encourages more scrutiny and accountability around such government initiatives.
Agreed, transparency and follow-through are crucial. Overpromising on service levels and then under-delivering can really undermine public trust. Curious to see if they address these issues constructively.
This seems like a classic case of overpromising and under-delivering. Bringing government services closer to the people is a noble goal, but the discrepancy between the grand claims and the actual reality is disappointing. I wonder what the root causes are behind this PR debacle.
You’re right, it’s a letdown when politicians’ bold promises don’t match the on-the-ground experience. Transparency and accountability are key for building public trust in such initiatives.
It’s disappointing to see such a disconnect between the hype and the reality. Bringing government services closer to citizens is a worthwhile goal, but it has to be backed by rigorous planning and flawless execution. This seems more like a PR stunt than a genuine effort to improve service delivery.
I agree, the optics-over-substance approach is problematic. True progress requires a deep understanding of the challenges, meticulous implementation, and a relentless focus on serving the needs of citizens. Hopefully, they’ll learn from this experience and course-correct accordingly.
The symbolic locking of the RTO office was an interesting touch, but if the actual service hours are still limited, it seems more like a PR stunt than a meaningful change. I hope the government takes this feedback seriously and works to truly improve accessibility and delivery of essential services.
Good point. Optics alone won’t cut it – real, tangible improvements to service quality and availability are needed. Curious to see if they’ll course-correct or double down on the current approach.
This is a disappointing outcome, but not entirely surprising. Governments often struggle to translate big, flashy announcements into seamless, on-the-ground execution. I hope they learn from this experience and focus more on practical, incremental improvements rather than grandiose promises.
Well said. Incremental, realistic progress is often more impactful than dramatic rhetoric. Curious to see if they can pivot to a more measured, transparent approach that actually delivers for citizens.
The “Jhoot [Lies] at Your Doorstep” label is quite damning. While the intent behind bringing services closer to people may have been good, the gulf between claims and reality is problematic. Effective public service delivery requires meticulous planning and follow-through, not just PR stunts.
Exactly. Catchy slogans and photo ops won’t cut it – the government needs to focus on the nuts and bolts of service quality, accessibility, and reliability. Transparency and accountability should be the priorities here.
This seems like a classic case of political grandstanding that fails to deliver on the ground. While the idea of bringing government services to people’s doorsteps is laudable, the execution appears to have fallen short. I hope they take this feedback to heart and work on more realistic, sustainable improvements.
Well said. Lofty promises are easy, but translating them into effective, efficient public services is the real challenge. Curious to see if they can pivot to a more pragmatic, user-focused approach that actually improves people’s lives.