Listen to the article
Georgia Tech Research Contractor Agrees to $875,000 Settlement Over Cybersecurity Violations
The Department of Justice announced this week that Georgia Tech Research Corporation (GTRC) has agreed to pay $875,000 to settle allegations that it failed to implement required cybersecurity protocols on defense research contracts, violating the False Claims Act.
The settlement resolves claims that GTRC, which conducts research on behalf of the Georgia Institute of Technology, did not meet contractually mandated cybersecurity requirements while performing sensitive research for the Department of Defense (DoD), Air Force, and Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).
Federal investigators allege that GTRC and Georgia Tech neglected to maintain basic cybersecurity measures, including anti-virus and anti-malware tools, on computer equipment in the university’s Astrolavos Lab. This lab was engaged in sensitive cyber-defense research projects for the Department of Defense, making these security lapses particularly concerning to federal officials.
The government further claimed that the research organization failed to implement a required system security plan for the Astrolavos Lab, which would have specified necessary cybersecurity controls and protocols. Additionally, GTRC allegedly submitted a misleading campus-wide cybersecurity assessment score to the DoD that did not accurately represent their actual security posture.
“Failure to follow required cybersecurity requirements puts all of us at risk,” said Stacy Bostjanick, Chief Defense Industrial Base Cybersecurity at the Office of the Chief Information Officer. She emphasized that contractors providing deficient cybersecurity measures or misrepresenting their security practices must be held accountable.
The case highlights growing concerns about cybersecurity compliance among defense contractors as nation-state threat actors and cybercriminals increasingly target sensitive defense research. The Pentagon has been strengthening its contractor cybersecurity requirements in recent years through initiatives like the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) program.
The settlement stemmed from a whistleblower lawsuit filed by Christopher Craig and Kyle Koza, former members of Georgia Tech’s Cybersecurity Team. They brought the case under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act, which allows private citizens to file lawsuits on behalf of the government against those who defraud federal programs.
As part of the settlement, Craig and Koza will receive $201,250 as their share of the recovery, reflecting the law’s intent to incentivize insiders to report potential fraud and security violations.
“When contractors fail to follow the required cybersecurity standards in their DoD contracts, they leave sensitive government information vulnerable to malicious actors and cyber threats,” said Assistant Attorney General Brett A. Shumate of the Justice Department’s Civil Division. He noted that the Department will continue to pursue and litigate violations of cybersecurity requirements to hold contractors accountable.
This case represents part of a broader trend of increased government enforcement of cybersecurity requirements in federal contracts. Similar actions have been brought against other contractors in recent years as federal agencies place greater emphasis on securing sensitive information, particularly in defense and intelligence-related research.
GTRC has neither admitted nor denied the allegations as part of the settlement agreement. The Justice Department emphasized that the claims resolved by the settlement are allegations only, and no determination of liability has been made.
The settlement underscores the critical importance of cybersecurity compliance for organizations working on sensitive government projects and signals that federal authorities are taking a more aggressive approach to enforcing these requirements across the defense industrial base.
Verify This Yourself
Use these professional tools to fact-check and investigate claims independently
Reverse Image Search
Check if this image has been used elsewhere or in different contexts
Ask Our AI About This Claim
Get instant answers with web-powered AI analysis
Related Fact-Checks
See what other fact-checkers have said about similar claims
Want More Verification Tools?
Access our full suite of professional disinformation monitoring and investigation tools
11 Comments
This settlement highlights the critical importance of robust cybersecurity practices, even for academic institutions working on government projects. Failures to implement required protocols can have serious consequences.
Concerning to see such cybersecurity failures on sensitive defense research contracts. Proper security protocols must be followed to protect critical information. $875,000 seems a fair settlement, but I hope this leads to stronger oversight and accountability going forward.
Agreed. Lax cybersecurity on defense projects is unacceptable. Glad to see the DoJ taking action to enforce compliance and protect sensitive data.
Disappointing to hear about these cybersecurity failures on important defense projects. Contractors must be held to the highest standards when handling sensitive government data. Hopefully this case prompts broader reforms.
Kudos to the DoJ for holding this defense contractor accountable. Cutting corners on cybersecurity for critical defense projects is simply unacceptable. Hopefully this sends a strong message to the industry.
Absolutely. Government must maintain strict oversight to ensure all contractors take cybersecurity seriously, no exceptions.
This is concerning to see, especially given the sensitive nature of the defense research involved. Proper security protocols are essential to protect critical information. I hope this leads to improved practices across the industry.
Concerning to see these cybersecurity lapses on sensitive defense research. Proper security protocols must be followed to safeguard critical information. Hopefully this case leads to stronger oversight and accountability in the industry.
This settlement highlights the importance of robust cybersecurity practices, even for academic research institutions working with the DoD. Failures to implement basic security measures can have serious consequences.
Indeed. All contractors handling sensitive government data must meet rigorous security standards. Hopefully this case serves as a wake-up call for others.
It’s troubling that basic security measures were neglected on these defense research contracts. Cybersecurity needs to be a top priority, especially for work involving sensitive government information. Glad to see the DoJ taking action.