Listen to the article
Navarro Stirs Controversy with Incorrect Clinton Impeachment Comments on The View
Ana Navarro, co-host of ABC’s “The View,” sparked criticism following comments made during the December 5 episode where she incorrectly stated that former President Bill Clinton was not impeached over the Monica Lewinsky scandal.
During a segment discussing double standards faced by women involved in affairs with powerful men, the panel – consisting of Joy Behar, Sara Haines, Navarro, Sunny Hostin, and Alyssa Farah Griffin – examined the recent controversy surrounding journalist Olivia Nuzzi’s affair with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the current Secretary of Health and Human Services.
The conversation shifted when Behar mentioned that Monica Lewinsky had reached out to Nuzzi regarding her own experience. “A lot of people think she got dragged through the mud over her affair with Bill Clinton,” Behar noted. “A lot of people say that he got away easily and she didn’t.”
Navarro then offered her perspective on the Clinton-Lewinsky scandal, suggesting that societal views have evolved since the 1990s. “I think that if the Monica scandal, if the Clinton scandal with Monica had occurred after the MeToo Movement, he probably would have been impeached,” Navarro stated.
Her comment contained a significant historical inaccuracy. President Clinton was, in fact, impeached by the House of Representatives in December 1998 on charges of perjury and obstruction of justice related to his testimony about the affair. He was later acquitted by the Senate in February 1999, allowing him to complete his second term in office.
Navarro continued her commentary by drawing contemporary political parallels, suggesting that Clinton benefited from his charisma and popularity. “Because we like Bill Clinton, because he is so charismatic, because so many people think he was a good president, I think people were willing to give him a pass,” she said. She then added, “But I think he would have been judged differently after MeToo, unless he was Donald Trump and a Republican.”
The remarks quickly drew criticism online, with viewers pointing out the factual error regarding Clinton’s impeachment. One social media user wrote, “Ana Navarro falsely claims Bill Clinton wasn’t impeached after the Monica Lewinski scandal and seemingly blames Trump supporters.”
This represents the second on-air blunder for Navarro this week. Her reference to Trump appeared to allude to the former president’s history with allegations of sexual misconduct, as 28 different women have made various claims against him over the years.
Trump himself faced impeachment twice during his presidency – first in 2019 for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress related to Russian election interference allegations, and again in January 2021 following the Capitol riot. Like Clinton, Trump was acquitted by the Senate in both instances.
The discussion reflects the ongoing cultural reassessment of powerful men’s conduct in the wake of the MeToo movement. The Clinton-Lewinsky scandal, which dominated headlines in the late 1990s, has been reexamined through contemporary lenses, with many observers noting the power imbalance between the 22-year-old intern and the President of the United States.
Meanwhile, Nuzzi’s situation has reignited debates about journalistic ethics, conflicts of interest, and the continued double standards faced by women involved in high-profile affairs. Nuzzi reportedly broke down in tears during an appearance on the Bulwark podcast when discussing the personal and professional fallout from the revelation.
“The View” continues to serve as a platform for these culturally relevant, if occasionally factually challenged, conversations weekdays on ABC.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
10 Comments
The Clinton impeachment is a fascinating case study in how public opinion and media coverage can shift over time. It’s an important historical event worth examining from various angles.
Agreed, these kinds of scandals often reveal a lot about the cultural and political dynamics of their era. It’s valuable to reflect on how norms and attitudes have changed.
Interesting to see how the panelists are grappling with the nuances of this historical event. There’s a lot to unpack in terms of gender, power, and the evolving societal attitudes.
Absolutely, these kinds of high-profile scandals often reveal a lot about the broader cultural and political landscape of their time. It’s worthwhile to analyze the shifting narratives and perspectives.
This discussion touches on some complex issues around power dynamics, gender double standards, and the evolving social climate. It’s an important conversation to have, though the details need to be accurate.
Navarro’s comments about the Clinton impeachment seem to be factually incorrect. I’d be interested in learning more about the details and legal nuances of that case.
Yes, getting the facts right is important, especially for public figures commenting on significant historical events. Fact-checking is crucial.
Factual accuracy is crucial when discussing significant historical events like the Clinton impeachment. I hope the panelists can provide a balanced and well-informed analysis of this complex issue.
Interesting discussion on the Clinton-Lewinsky scandal. It’s a complex issue with evolving societal views. I’m curious to hear more perspectives on how these kinds of high-profile affairs are perceived differently today compared to the 1990s.
The Lewinsky scandal was a major political and cultural moment. Examining how it’s viewed today compared to the 1990s could provide valuable insights into social progress and the changing nature of public discourse.