Listen to the article
Changpeng Zhao, the founder of cryptocurrency exchange Binance, has announced his intention to pursue legal action against U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren for alleged defamation following comments she made after Zhao received a presidential pardon from Donald Trump.
According to a statement posted on X (formerly Twitter) and a formal letter from his attorney Teresa Goody Guillen, Zhao—commonly known as CZ—is demanding a public retraction from Senator Warren, claiming she falsely associated him with money laundering charges that were never brought against him.
“Senator Warren’s characterizations are demonstrably false and have caused significant harm to my client’s reputation,” Guillen wrote in the letter. The legal team has given Warren a deadline to issue a retraction before proceeding with the lawsuit.
The dispute stems from the presidential pardon Zhao received last week, which eliminated legal penalties resulting from a 2023 plea agreement. That agreement involved violations of the Bank Secrecy Act related to compliance failures at Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange by trading volume.
While the Department of Justice did not find evidence of money laundering or fraud during its investigation, Warren allegedly referred to Zhao as a “convicted felon” in social media posts following Trump’s pardon. Zhao’s legal team contends this characterization is false and defamatory.
The conflict highlights the ongoing tension between the cryptocurrency industry and certain U.S. lawmakers who have taken critical stances toward digital assets. Senator Warren has been a vocal critic of the cryptocurrency sector, frequently raising concerns about consumer protection, financial stability, and compliance with anti-money laundering regulations.
Legal experts note that pursuing defamation claims against sitting U.S. senators presents significant challenges. Senators enjoy certain legislative immunities, and public figures like Zhao must meet the high legal threshold of proving “actual malice”—demonstrating that Warren knowingly made false statements or showed reckless disregard for the truth.
“The courts have traditionally given wide latitude to political speech, particularly when made by elected officials,” said Daniel Johnson, a constitutional law professor at Georgetown University. “The question will be whether Senator Warren’s statements qualify as protected political expression or if they cross into deliberately false accusations.”
The cryptocurrency industry has faced intensified regulatory scrutiny in the United States over the past several years. Binance itself reached a $4.3 billion settlement with U.S. authorities in 2023, at which time Zhao stepped down as CEO and pleaded guilty to the compliance violations.
Trump’s pardon of Zhao came alongside pardons for several other high-profile individuals, including former cryptocurrency entrepreneur Sam Bankman-Fried, who was convicted of fraud related to the collapse of FTX. The pardons have sparked debate about the relationship between the incoming Trump administration and the digital asset industry.
The potential lawsuit also occurs against the backdrop of shifting cryptocurrency regulations worldwide. While some countries have embraced digital assets, major economies including the U.S. have struggled to develop comprehensive regulatory frameworks that balance innovation with consumer protection.
As of publication, Senator Warren’s office has not issued a public response to Zhao’s legal threats. If the lawsuit proceeds, it could become a closely watched case at the intersection of free speech, political discourse, and the rapidly evolving cryptocurrency landscape.
Zhao, who founded Binance in 2017, remains an influential figure in the cryptocurrency space despite stepping back from day-to-day operations at the exchange. The company continues to be a dominant player in global cryptocurrency trading, though it has faced regulatory challenges in multiple jurisdictions.
Verify This Yourself
Use these professional tools to fact-check and investigate claims independently
Reverse Image Search
Check if this image has been used elsewhere or in different contexts
Ask Our AI About This Claim
Get instant answers with web-powered AI analysis
Related Fact-Checks
See what other fact-checkers have said about similar claims
Want More Verification Tools?
Access our full suite of professional disinformation monitoring and investigation tools
7 Comments
This highlights the complex and often murky legal landscape surrounding cryptocurrencies. I’m curious to see how the legal challenge unfolds and whether it leads to greater clarity around compliance requirements for major crypto exchanges.
Defamation lawsuits can be tricky, but if Senator Warren’s claims are indeed false, Zhao seems justified in pursuing legal action. However, the broader issues of crypto regulation and oversight shouldn’t be lost in the personal dispute.
Well said. The legal battle shouldn’t distract from the need for robust regulatory frameworks to ensure accountability in the crypto industry.
The presidential pardon for Binance’s compliance issues raises some questions. While the legal process should play out, it’s concerning if crypto firms are receiving special treatment. Transparency around these matters is crucial for public trust.
I agree. Any perception of preferential treatment or political influence in the crypto space needs to be investigated thoroughly.
This is an interesting legal battle. Senator Warren’s comments seem to have overstepped if there were no money laundering charges. Zhao deserves a chance to defend his reputation, but it’s also important to scrutinize crypto exchange compliance.
This is a high-profile case that could have wider implications for how crypto firms and public officials interact. I’ll be following the developments closely to see if it leads to any meaningful changes in the industry.