Listen to the article
Binance Founder Rebuffs Warren’s Claims Following Presidential Pardon
Changpeng Zhao, founder of cryptocurrency exchange Binance, has firmly rejected allegations made by Senator Elizabeth Warren regarding money laundering charges following his recent presidential pardon by former President Donald Trump.
The public dispute erupted after Warren took to social media claiming Zhao had “pleaded guilty to a criminal money laundering charge” before receiving a pardon. Warren suggested the pardon was linked to Zhao’s financial connections to Trump, calling it “corruption” and urging Congress to intervene.
“If Congress does not stop this kind of corruption, it owns it,” Warren stated in her social media post, implying impropriety in the pardon process.
Zhao, widely known in the crypto community as “CZ,” quickly countered these assertions, emphasizing that he had never faced money laundering charges. “A US Senator can’t get her facts right, in a public post about a person’s charge. There were NO money laundering changes,” Zhao wrote in his response.
The Binance founder further claimed that Warren had “declared ‘war on crypto'” on television days before his sentencing during the Biden administration, suggesting political motivation behind the senator’s criticisms. Zhao characterized Warren’s comments as an example of government weaponization against the cryptocurrency industry.
Zhao’s legal troubles stemmed from allegations of banking violations, not money laundering as claimed by Warren. The senator’s statements have drawn criticism for factual inaccuracies, with many in the crypto community rallying behind Zhao in the wake of these claims.
The public exchange highlights the ongoing tensions between traditional regulatory figures like Warren and cryptocurrency industry leaders. Warren has consistently positioned herself as a cryptocurrency skeptic, advocating for stricter regulation of digital assets and criticizing what she perceives as risks to consumers and financial stability.
Meanwhile, the market has responded positively to Zhao’s pardon. Binance Coin (BNB), the native cryptocurrency of the Binance exchange, saw a significant 5% increase in value following the news, pushing its price above $1,130. This continues BNB’s strong performance throughout 2025, with the token now up over 100% from its earlier lows this year.
Trading volume for BNB has surged 61%, reaching $5.74 billion, indicating heightened interest from investors following the pardon announcement. This market reaction suggests continued confidence in both Zhao and the Binance ecosystem despite the regulatory controversies.
Binance remains one of the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchanges by trading volume, handling billions of dollars in transactions daily. The platform has faced regulatory scrutiny in multiple jurisdictions as governments worldwide grapple with how to effectively oversee the rapidly evolving cryptocurrency industry.
The dispute between Warren and Zhao exemplifies the broader clash between traditional financial regulators and cryptocurrency innovators. As digital assets continue to gain mainstream adoption, these tensions are likely to persist, with public figures on both sides attempting to shape the narrative around cryptocurrency’s role in the global financial system.
Industry observers note that accurate legal characterizations are crucial in discussions about cryptocurrency regulation. The distinction between different types of financial violations carries significant implications for both public perception and regulatory approaches to digital assets.
As the cryptocurrency industry continues to mature, exchanges like Binance face the challenge of balancing innovation with compliance, navigating complex and often uncertain regulatory landscapes across different countries while maintaining operational functionality for users worldwide.
Verify This Yourself
Use these professional tools to fact-check and investigate claims independently
Reverse Image Search
Check if this image has been used elsewhere or in different contexts
Ask Our AI About This Claim
Get instant answers with web-powered AI analysis
Related Fact-Checks
See what other fact-checkers have said about similar claims
Want More Verification Tools?
Access our full suite of professional disinformation monitoring and investigation tools
16 Comments
This is an interesting development in the ongoing debate around crypto regulation and oversight. While the specific details are still unclear, it’s important that any allegations of wrongdoing are thoroughly investigated and resolved through proper legal channels. Maintaining public trust in these systems is crucial.
Absolutely. Crypto is a complex and often misunderstood industry, so it’s critical that regulators and policymakers approach these issues with nuance and care. Knee-jerk reactions or partisan posturing won’t serve anyone well.
I’m curious to learn more about the details around this pardon and any potential links to Trump’s financial connections. At the same time, it’s important that any investigations are fair and impartial, without political bias from either side.
Well said. These issues are often complex, and it’s important to avoid rushing to judgment before all the facts are known. Maintaining objectivity is crucial.
It’s troubling to see accusations of corruption, even at the highest levels. However, I think it’s important to withhold judgment until a full investigation can be conducted. Crypto regulations are a sensitive topic, and it’s critical that the process remains transparent and above-board.
I agree, transparency and due process are essential here. Rushing to conclusions without all the evidence risks further eroding public trust, which is the last thing the crypto industry needs right now.
This looks like another chapter in the ongoing battle between crypto advocates and skeptical regulators. While I don’t have a strong opinion on the specifics, I hope both sides can find a way to work together constructively to protect consumers while also fostering responsible innovation in this rapidly evolving industry.
Well said. Striking the right balance between oversight and innovation is critical for the long-term health of the crypto industry. Maintaining open communication and a willingness to compromise on both sides will be key to resolving these types of disputes.
This seems to be another example of the ongoing tension between crypto innovators and regulators. While I don’t have a strong opinion on the specifics, I hope both sides can find a way to work together constructively to protect consumers while also fostering responsible innovation.
Well said. Striking the right balance between oversight and innovation is critical for the long-term health of the crypto industry. Maintaining open communication and a willingness to compromise on both sides will be key.
This looks like another political dispute over crypto regulations. While I don’t have a strong opinion on the specifics, it’s concerning to see accusations of corruption and impropriety being thrown around. I hope the parties can find a constructive path forward that protects consumers without stifling innovation.
Agreed, these types of partisan accusations often generate more heat than light. Hopefully the relevant authorities can thoroughly investigate the facts and come to a balanced conclusion.
It’s concerning to see such high-profile figures trading accusations, but I’m glad to see Zhao quickly responding to refute the claims. Maintaining transparency and due process is essential, especially when it comes to sensitive topics like crypto regulation and potential corruption.
I agree. Polarization and partisan bickering often obscure the real issues at hand. Hopefully, this can be resolved through calm, evidence-based dialogue rather than heated rhetoric.
The allegations of corruption and impropriety are certainly concerning, but I think it’s important to withhold judgment until a full investigation can be conducted. Crypto is a complex and often misunderstood industry, so it’s crucial that any regulatory actions are based on facts, not partisan rhetoric.
Agreed. These types of high-profile disputes can quickly become politicized, which rarely leads to productive outcomes. Focusing on transparency, due process, and evidence-based policymaking will be essential going forward.