Listen to the article
In a sweeping document release by the U.S. Department of Justice, unfounded allegations regarding Bill Gates have emerged among millions of pages of materials connected to deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, drawing swift denials from the Microsoft co-founder’s representatives.
Gates has categorically rejected claims found in the newly released files, including allegations that he contracted a sexually transmitted disease from “Russian girls,” with his spokesperson describing the assertions as “absolutely absurd and completely false.”
The allegations appear in two draft emails dated July 18, 2013, written from Epstein’s own email address to himself, with no indication they were ever sent to Gates or anyone else. One draft was styled as a resignation letter from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, while the other began “dear Bill” and made lurid claims about concealing a sexually transmitted infection.
“The only thing these documents demonstrate is Epstein’s frustration that he did not have an ongoing relationship with Gates and the lengths he would go to entrap and defame,” Gates’s spokesperson told the BBC, emphasizing that the allegations come from “a proven, disgruntled liar.”
The documents containing these allegations are part of what the Justice Department describes as its largest government release since the Epstein transparency law mandated disclosure last year. In total, the DOJ has published nearly 3.5 million pages, including more than 2,000 videos and 180,000 images related to the Epstein investigation.
The massive document dump places sensitive and unverified materials into the public domain, creating a challenging information environment where allegations and verified facts must be carefully distinguished. The DOJ itself has warned that some materials in the release contain “untrue and sensationalist claims” that were submitted to the FBI but never substantiated.
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche stated that the publication “marks the end of a very comprehensive document identification and review process to ensure transparency to the American people and compliance” with the law requiring the materials’ release.
The documents encompass Epstein’s imprisonment and death, investigative records on his long-time associate Ghislaine Maxwell, and communications with various prominent individuals spanning more than a decade. The DOJ emphasized that throughout the review process, redactions were limited to protecting victims and their families, while “notable individuals and politicians were not redacted.”
“This production may include fake or falsely submitted images, documents or videos, as everything that was sent to the FBI by the public was included in the production that is responsive to the Act,” the DOJ explained in its statement, underscoring the need for caution when interpreting the contents.
The release has already sparked political debate, with Democratic Representative Ro Khanna of California questioning why only about 3.5 million of more than six million identified pages would be released after review. “This raises questions as to why the rest are being withheld,” Khanna said, signaling possible congressional interest in examining the withheld materials.
Epstein, who died in prison in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges, was known to cultivate relationships with wealthy and powerful figures, creating a web of connections that has continued to generate headlines years after his death. His former associate Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted in 2021 of sex trafficking and is currently serving a 20-year prison sentence.
The document release serves as a reminder of the complex legacy of the Epstein case, which continues to reverberate through America’s political, business, and cultural landscape, even as the justice system attempts to bring transparency to the extensive investigation.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
5 Comments
It’s disappointing to see unfounded rumors and gossip being amplified, especially when they involve high-profile individuals. Gates’s team seems to have swiftly and decisively refuted these claims, which is the appropriate response. We should focus on facts, not sensationalism.
While the allegations against Bill Gates are quite salacious, the fact that they appear to originate from Epstein himself and were never actually sent to Gates suggests they are likely fabricated. We should be cautious about drawing conclusions without more credible information.
The connection between Gates and Epstein is certainly concerning, but these specific allegations seem to be more about Epstein’s own agenda than any actual wrongdoing by Gates. We need to be vigilant about separating truth from fiction, especially when it comes to such sensitive topics.
This seems like a classic case of false allegations being used to smear a prominent figure. It’s concerning how easily misinformation can spread, even when the claims are clearly unfounded. We should be wary of taking such accusations at face value without strong evidence.
These kinds of unsubstantiated claims are exactly the kind of misinformation that can erode public trust. I’m glad to see Gates’s team pushing back strongly and I hope the media will refrain from amplifying such dubious allegations without clear evidence to back them up.