Listen to the article
New England Patriots wide receiver Stefon Diggs has pleaded not guilty to felony strangulation and other charges stemming from an alleged altercation with his former personal chef, Mila Adams.
The arraignment, initially scheduled for January 23, was postponed to February 13 after the Patriots advanced to Super Bowl LX, where they ultimately lost to the Seattle Seahawks 29-13. Diggs caught three passes for 37 yards in the championship game. His next court appearance, a pretrial hearing, is set for April 1.
Adams broke her silence Friday afternoon, releasing a statement to address what she described as false information circulating publicly about the case.
“I am a professional chef with over 10 years of experience working with public figures and in the sports industry. My reputation and integrity matter deeply to me,” Adams wrote. “Claims that I engaged in settlement discussions are not true. I have never sought money nor engaged in settlement discussions to settle this matter. Statements suggesting otherwise are harmful and untrue.”
Adams, who identified herself as a survivor of domestic violence, emphasized that she reported the matter through proper legal channels and did not seek public attention. According to initial reports, Adams alleged that Diggs slapped and choked her following a dispute over salary.
“I will not engage in rumors, personal attacks, or respond to misinformation on social media, and I ask others to refrain from spreading false narratives,” Adams stated. “My focus is on healing, my work, and moving forward with integrity.”
This criminal case comes at a challenging time for Diggs, who is simultaneously facing a separate civil lawsuit. An unnamed man has filed suit against the NFL star for alleged defamation, civil conspiracy, and vicarious liability for an assault against him.
According to court documents reported by TMZ Sports, the plaintiff claims he worked for Diggs in July 2024 and was asked to transport Diggs’ Ferrari from Miami to New York and then to Houston. The man alleges the vehicle was stolen in Houston, but Diggs continued to accuse him of theft despite no criminal charges being filed against him.
The plaintiff further claims that Diggs’ accusations severely damaged his concierge business. Most seriously, the lawsuit alleges that in December 2025, two men in Diggs’ circle attacked the plaintiff at Tootsie’s Cabaret in Miami, with Diggs’ brother, Dallas Cowboys cornerback Trevon Diggs, allegedly witnessing the incident without intervening. The man reportedly suffered numerous injuries, including a torn ACL.
Diggs, 30, has established himself as one of the NFL’s premier wide receivers during his 11-year career. After being drafted by the Minnesota Vikings in 2015, he has also played for the Buffalo Bills and Houston Texans before joining the Patriots. His career achievements include 942 receptions for 11,504 yards and 74 touchdowns, along with First Team All-Pro honors in 2020, Second Team All-Pro recognition in 2022, and four Pro Bowl selections.
The legal troubles come at a pivotal moment in Diggs’ career, as he attempts to establish himself with the Patriots following his high-profile departure from Buffalo last season. New England, under new leadership, is working to rebuild its offense around young talent, with Diggs expected to serve as a veteran presence and primary receiving option.
The NFL has not yet announced any disciplinary action against Diggs under its personal conduct policy, which typically awaits the resolution of legal proceedings. The Patriots organization has not issued a formal statement regarding the allegations or Diggs’ status with the team for the upcoming season.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
20 Comments
This case highlights the complexities involved in domestic violence allegations, especially when public figures are concerned. I hope the legal system can navigate it fairly.
Allegations of this nature can have far-reaching implications, so it’s critical that the investigation is thorough and impartial.
Ms. Adams’ statement seems to provide some important clarification on the case. I appreciate her emphasis on maintaining her integrity and professionalism.
It’s good to hear her perspective and ensure accurate information is circulating about this sensitive matter.
The alleged strangulation incident is quite concerning, if true. I hope the legal process can shed light on what actually occurred between the parties.
Domestic violence allegations should always be taken seriously and investigated thoroughly, regardless of the individuals involved.
The postponement of the arraignment due to the Super Bowl is an interesting wrinkle in this case. I’ll be curious to see how that affects the timeline and proceedings.
High-profile cases like this often involve complex scheduling considerations. The focus should remain on uncovering the truth.
This case seems to involve a lot of complex details and competing narratives. I’ll be following the developments closely to see how it ultimately unfolds.
Domestic violence allegations can have significant ramifications, so it’s crucial that the facts are established through due process.
Interesting case with a lot of details yet to be uncovered. I’ll be following this story closely to see how it develops and what the final outcome is.
Allegations of this nature can have significant reputational and career consequences, so it’s crucial that the facts are established through due process.
This is a serious situation that requires a thorough and impartial investigation. I hope the truth comes to light and justice is served, regardless of the parties involved.
Domestic violence allegations should always be taken seriously. It’s important to allow the legal process to unfold and avoid rushing to judgment.
The postponement of the arraignment due to the Super Bowl is an interesting twist in this case. I hope the legal system can navigate the scheduling challenges effectively.
Maintaining impartiality and objectivity should be the top priority, regardless of the high-profile nature of the individuals involved.
Ms. Adams’ statement emphasizes the importance of maintaining professionalism and integrity, even in the face of public scrutiny. That’s an admirable approach.
Preserving one’s reputation is crucial, especially for those in the public eye. I hope the facts of this case can be determined objectively.
It’s good to see Ms. Adams speaking up to address what she considers false information. Clarity and transparency are important in cases like this.
I appreciate her emphasizing the importance of her reputation and integrity. That’s a commendable approach in the face of public scrutiny.