Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Immigration officials shot and killed Alex Pretti, a Minneapolis Veterans Affairs ICU nurse, sparking a wave of false information about his professional background that continues to circulate on social media.

Claims that Pretti was fired from a previous healthcare position for “inappropriate behavior” with patients have been debunked as entirely fabricated. These rumors stem from a fictitious news report published on the website buzzreport247, which cited a non-existent doctor named Elena Vasquez, supposedly from “Lakeshore Medical Center.”

The fabricated report alleged that Pretti had been terminated in October 2025 following “five documented incidents of inappropriate behavior” with multiple patients who had filed complaints. The article even included elaborate but completely fictional quotes from the purported Dr. Vasquez.

Investigations reveal several key facts that expose the falsehood: Pretti never worked at Lakeshore Medical Center, and there is no record of a Dr. Elena Vasquez affiliated with that institution. The entire narrative appears designed to tarnish the reputation of the deceased nurse in the wake of the controversial shooting.

Pretti, who was 37 at the time of his death, had built a legitimate and respected career in healthcare. His professional history shows he earned his nursing license in January 2021 after completing his education at the University of Minnesota. During his studies, he supported himself by working at the Veterans Affairs hospital where he would later build his career.

After graduation, Pretti briefly served as a research assistant at the University of Minnesota before transitioning to a full-time role at the Minneapolis VA Health Care System. At the time of his death in January 2026, he had been working as a dedicated ICU nurse at the VA facility for approximately five years, specializing in providing care to critically ill veterans.

Colleagues have consistently described Pretti as a committed healthcare professional, contrasting sharply with the fabricated narrative being spread online.

This case illustrates a troubling pattern that often emerges following high-profile incidents involving law enforcement. False information spreads rapidly across social media platforms, complicating public understanding of already sensitive situations and potentially influencing public opinion before all facts are established.

The spread of misinformation following Pretti’s death has added another layer of complexity to an already contentious incident. The fatal shooting by border patrol agents has sparked significant community response in Minneapolis, with many questioning the circumstances surrounding the use of deadly force.

Healthcare professionals from the Minneapolis VA Health Care System and the broader medical community have expressed outrage not only at the loss of their colleague but also at attempts to defame his professional reputation posthumously.

Digital misinformation experts note that fabricated stories often target victims of high-profile incidents, particularly when those incidents involve controversial actions by law enforcement or government agencies. These false narratives can serve to distract from scrutiny of official conduct or to undermine public sympathy for victims.

As investigations into the shooting continue, community leaders and Pretti’s colleagues have called for respect for his memory and professional legacy, urging the public to verify information before sharing potentially harmful content online.

The Minneapolis VA Health Care System has not issued formal statements about the false claims, focusing instead on supporting staff members grieving the loss of their colleague while continuing to provide essential care to veterans.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

14 Comments

  1. Mary I. Thompson on

    This is a tragic situation, and I’m saddened to see how quickly false information has spread. It’s important that we focus on the facts and avoid perpetuating harmful rumors, even if they seem to fit a certain narrative. The truth should be the priority here.

    • Well said. In the digital age, we all have a responsibility to be critical consumers of information and to verify claims before sharing them. Spreading misinformation, even with good intentions, can have serious consequences.

  2. It’s concerning to see how quickly false information can spread online, especially when it comes to sensitive topics like this. We need to be vigilant about verifying claims before sharing them, to avoid perpetuating harmful rumors.

    • Michael O. Moore on

      Absolutely. In this digital age, it’s easier than ever for misinformation to gain traction. Fact-checking and critical thinking are so important, especially when it comes to high-profile cases.

  3. Jennifer Garcia on

    As disturbing as this situation is, it’s important that we avoid fueling the spread of misinformation. The false allegations about the nurse’s employment history are clearly fabricated, and we should focus on honoring his memory and seeking justice through proper channels.

    • Absolutely. Fact-checking and critical thinking are essential in today’s world, where information (and misinformation) can spread so quickly. We owe it to ourselves and our communities to be discerning and to prioritize the truth.

  4. This is a heartbreaking case, and I’m deeply troubled by the spread of false information. It’s crucial that we stick to the facts and avoid perpetuating harmful rumors, even if they seem to fit a certain narrative. The truth should be the priority, and we must honor the memory of the deceased nurse with dignity and respect.

    • Well said. In a time of heightened emotions and divisiveness, it’s more important than ever to approach sensitive topics with care and nuance. Spreading unsubstantiated claims, even with good intentions, can do more harm than good.

  5. Jennifer Davis on

    It’s disturbing to see how quickly misinformation can spread, especially when it comes to sensitive topics like this. We need to be vigilant about verifying claims before sharing them, to avoid perpetuating harmful rumors that can further traumatize the victims and their loved ones.

    • William Miller on

      I completely agree. In the age of social media, it’s all too easy for false narratives to gain traction. We have a responsibility to ourselves and our communities to seek out the truth, rather than blindly accepting and amplifying unsubstantiated allegations.

  6. Lucas G. Taylor on

    This is a very unfortunate situation. It’s disturbing to see false allegations being spread about the deceased nurse’s professional record, especially when the facts show they are completely fabricated. We should be focusing on the real issues at hand rather than engaging in unsubstantiated rumors.

    • I agree, it’s important to stick to the facts and not spread misinformation, even if it’s about a controversial case. The truth should be the priority here.

  7. This is a tragic situation all around. While the details are still emerging, it’s clear that the false allegations about the nurse’s employment history are completely unfounded. We should focus on honoring his memory and seeking justice through proper channels.

    • Well said. Spreading unverified claims, even if they seem to fit a certain narrative, is never the right approach. The facts should guide the discussion, not rumor and speculation.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.