Listen to the article
In a dramatic turn of events, self-styled evangelist Patricia Asiedua, popularly known as Nana Agradaa, has officially retracted all allegations previously made against prominent gospel musician Empress Gifty Oppong Adorye, admitting that her claims were entirely fabricated.
The retraction, confirmed by Agradaa’s legal team at Agyaa Asamani Law Consult, addresses controversial statements made on social media platforms in May 2025 that had sparked significant public discourse within Ghana’s religious and entertainment communities.
“These allegations were uttered in the spur of the moment and have no factual basis whatsoever,” stated the legal document released Thursday. The formal retraction emphasizes that all accusations against Empress Gifty should be disregarded completely.
The public dispute between the two high-profile figures had captured widespread attention across Ghana’s media landscape, with many followers of both personalities taking sides in what became an increasingly contentious affair. The controversy represented another chapter in Ghana’s complex relationship between traditional religious practices and modern Christianity, as Agradaa herself transitioned from traditional priestess to Christian evangelist in recent years.
Agradaa’s statement included an unequivocal apology, acknowledging the substantial damage inflicted on Empress Gifty’s professional reputation, personal life, and mental wellbeing. The apology extended beyond the artist herself to include her family, professional associates, and broader circle of supporters.
“I deeply regret the distress, embarrassment, and professional harm my unfounded statements may have caused,” the apology read in part. Industry observers note that such public accusations can significantly impact gospel musicians, whose careers depend heavily on maintaining moral credibility within religious communities.
The legal representatives emphasized that this formal retraction aims to “restore peace and bring closure” to a controversy that had persisted for months, creating division among followers and generating extensive media coverage.
Ghana’s entertainment industry has witnessed several high-profile disputes between religious figures and artists in recent years, reflecting the significant intersection between faith and popular culture in the West African nation. The gospel music scene, in particular, operates within delicate boundaries of religious expectations and entertainment appeal.
Empress Gifty, who has built a substantial following through hit songs and high-energy performances, had previously maintained a dignified silence regarding many of Agradaa’s accusations, choosing instead to focus on her music ministry. Industry insiders suggest the unfounded allegations temporarily affected bookings and endorsement opportunities for the artist.
For Nana Agradaa, this retraction represents another controversial chapter in her public life. After gaining notoriety as a traditional priestess who operated a television station promoting money-doubling rituals, she publicly converted to Christianity in 2021, rebranding herself as an evangelist. Her transformation has been met with skepticism from some religious leaders who question the authenticity of her conversion.
Media analysts suggest the public nature of this retraction might help repair some damage to both parties’ reputations, though the lingering effects of such public disputes often remain in the digital space long after formal apologies are issued.
The Ghanaian social media landscape had been particularly divided over the issue, with hashtags related to both figures trending repeatedly during the height of the controversy. Entertainment commentators note that such public reconciliations, while necessary, highlight the growing challenge of managing reputation in an era where accusations spread instantly across digital platforms.
Neither Empress Gifty nor her management team has publicly responded to the retraction at the time of reporting.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
5 Comments
This case highlights the potential risks of social media amplifying unverified claims. I’m glad to see the legal system intervening to set the record straight. It’s a good reminder of the need for responsible and ethical use of digital platforms.
The formal retraction and acknowledgment that the allegations were fabricated is a commendable step. Maintaining transparency and acknowledging mistakes is crucial for upholding public trust, particularly in sensitive matters involving religion and culture.
Interesting to see this high-profile retraction. It’s important for public figures to correct the record when making unsubstantiated claims, especially on sensitive religious and cultural topics. Transparency and accountability are crucial.
While it’s good to see the retraction, the original allegations must have caused significant public discourse and potentially even division. I hope this serves as a lesson on the importance of verifying information before making bold claims, especially for those in the public eye.
This dispute highlights the complex dynamics between traditional and modern religious practices in Ghana. I’m curious to learn more about the cultural and historical context that contributed to the public clash between these two prominent figures.