Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Aetna has agreed to pay $118 million to resolve allegations that it deliberately inflated patient illness scores to secure higher payments from Medicare Advantage programs, federal prosecutors announced Tuesday.

The settlement stems from a whistleblower lawsuit filed in 2015 by Olivia Hauser, a former Aetna Medicare Advantage division clinical manager, who claimed the insurance giant conducted inappropriate medical chart reviews to boost patient risk scores. This practice, commonly known as “upcoding,” artificially increases the severity of patient conditions, resulting in larger reimbursements from the federal government.

According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, Aetna submitted inaccurate diagnostic codes for Medicare Advantage beneficiaries in New York between 2011 and 2015. Prosecutors alleged the company failed to delete inaccurate diagnosis codes identified during chart reviews conducted by its vendors.

“Aetna’s settlement is the latest example of health insurers facing consequences for inflating risk scores to improperly boost their Medicare revenue,” said Damian Williams, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, in a statement. “Insurers who participate in Medicare Advantage must play by the rules and ensure that the diagnosis codes they submit for risk adjustment are accurate.”

Under the whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act, Hauser will receive approximately $21 million from the settlement amount. The law allows private individuals to file lawsuits on behalf of the government and receive a percentage of any recovered funds.

Aetna, now a subsidiary of CVS Health after a $69 billion acquisition in 2018, denied any wrongdoing as part of the settlement agreement. A company spokesperson stated Aetna “remains committed to compliance with all applicable laws, regulations, and program requirements.”

This settlement highlights the ongoing scrutiny of Medicare Advantage plans, which have experienced explosive growth over the past decade. Currently, more than 30 million seniors – representing about 51% of eligible Medicare beneficiaries – are enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.

Medicare Advantage, also known as Medicare Part C, allows private insurers to offer Medicare benefits while receiving fixed payments from the government based on regional averages and patient risk scores. The risk adjustment system provides higher payments for enrollees with more serious health conditions, creating financial incentives for insurers to document as many conditions as possible.

The Justice Department has increasingly targeted alleged upcoding practices in Medicare Advantage plans. Several major insurers, including UnitedHealth Group, Elevance Health (formerly Anthem), and Humana, have faced similar allegations in recent years.

In 2023, UnitedHealth Group agreed to pay $60 million to settle allegations that its subsidiary submitted inflated risk scores. Elevance Health reached a $5.1 million settlement with the DOJ in 2021 over comparable allegations.

Healthcare policy experts have long raised concerns about the Medicare Advantage payment system. A 2023 report from the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) estimated that Medicare Advantage plans received approximately $27 billion more in 2022 than the same beneficiaries would have cost under traditional Medicare.

“The risk adjustment system creates perverse incentives,” explained Dr. Jennifer Kent, healthcare policy professor at Georgetown University. “While the goal is to compensate insurers fairly for covering sicker patients, the current model rewards aggressive documentation and coding practices rather than actual improvements in patient care.”

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has implemented several reforms to address these issues, including enhanced audit procedures and adjustments to the risk adjustment model. However, critics argue more comprehensive reforms are needed.

As Medicare Advantage enrollment continues to grow and government spending on the program increases, industry analysts expect continued regulatory scrutiny and potential additional settlements in the coming years.

For beneficiaries, these settlements highlight the complex behind-the-scenes financial arrangements that drive the Medicare Advantage market but rarely translate to improved care outcomes or lower out-of-pocket costs.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

10 Comments

  1. Oliver Lopez on

    It’s disappointing to see a major insurer like Aetna engage in these tactics. Proper risk adjustment is critical for the sustainability of Medicare Advantage, and this case highlights the need for continued oversight and accountability.

    • Jennifer Martinez on

      Agreed, the integrity of these government health programs must be protected to ensure patients receive the care they’re entitled to.

  2. Amelia Hernandez on

    This highlights the importance of robust auditing and compliance measures to prevent insurers from exploiting loopholes or engaging in upcoding. $118 million is a hefty penalty, but these types of practices need to be strongly discouraged.

    • Linda Thomas on

      Absolutely, the financial incentives to upcode can be significant, so strict enforcement is key to deter this kind of behavior.

  3. Patricia Rodriguez on

    It’s concerning to hear about these kinds of fraudulent activities in the Medicare Advantage program. Proper oversight and enforcement are crucial to protect patients and the integrity of these government health plans.

  4. Robert Johnson on

    Seems like another case of insurers trying to game the system and boost their profits at the expense of taxpayers. Glad to see Aetna being held accountable for these alleged upcoding practices.

  5. Jennifer Thomas on

    While $118 million is a significant penalty, it’s important to consider the broader implications of these practices. Insurers must be held accountable to maintain the viability of the Medicare Advantage program.

  6. Michael Thompson on

    Upcoding is a serious problem that erodes public trust in the healthcare system. This settlement is a step in the right direction, but more needs to be done to ensure accurate coding and appropriate reimbursement levels.

  7. Lucas Martinez on

    I wonder how widespread this issue is across the Medicare Advantage landscape. Hopefully, this settlement serves as a deterrent and encourages other insurers to closely examine their own practices and risk adjustment procedures.

  8. Amelia Rodriguez on

    This case underscores the need for better data analytics and auditing capabilities to identify and address upcoding issues in a timely manner. Transparency and accountability should be the top priorities.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.