Listen to the article
Dutch Survey Reveals Growing Skepticism Toward Online Information
Public skepticism toward online information is rising sharply in the Netherlands, according to a new survey conducted by Statistics Netherlands (CBS). The comprehensive study on information and communication technology usage shows a significant increase in the number of people questioning the truthfulness of content they encounter online, particularly on social media platforms.
The survey found that 72% of respondents reported encountering information they believed to be false within the past three months, marking a notable increase from 67% in 2023 and 64% in 2021. This upward trend indicates a growing awareness among Dutch citizens about the potential for misinformation in digital spaces.
Social media platforms have experienced the steepest decline in public trust. A striking 63% of respondents expressed doubts about information shared on these platforms in 2024, compared to 54% in 2021. This 9-percentage-point increase within three years highlights the rapidly eroding confidence in content shared across platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.
In contrast, traditional news websites have maintained relatively stable trust levels. Only about a quarter of respondents indicated they believed information on news sites was untrue, a figure that has remained consistent over the past four years. This suggests established news organizations continue to command greater credibility among Dutch citizens compared to social media channels.
Age appears to play a significant role in determining skepticism levels. The survey revealed that people between 25 and 45 years old were the most skeptical group, with 84% expressing doubts about online information. Meanwhile, individuals over 65 were comparatively less dubious, though even in this demographic, skepticism is growing—48% now report having doubts about online content, an increase from previous years.
Gender and educational differences also emerged in the findings. Men were more likely than women to question the reliability of information, though the exact percentage gap was not specified. Educational background showed one of the most pronounced divides: 83% of respondents with university or college degrees expressed skepticism about online information, compared to just 59% of those with basic education. This 24-percentage-point difference suggests that higher education may correlate with greater critical assessment of digital content.
The survey also explored how people respond when encountering suspicious information. Among those who expressed doubts, approximately 70% took active measures to verify content, either through additional online research, offline verification, or discussions with others. The remaining respondents who didn’t verify questionable content fell into two main categories: those who immediately dismissed the information as unreliable and those who lacked the knowledge or found the verification process too complicated, with the latter group accounting for about 30% of non-verifiers.
These findings come at a time when misinformation and disinformation have become global concerns, potentially influencing democratic processes, public health responses, and social cohesion. The Netherlands, like many Western democracies, has seen heightened attention to the quality of information circulating online, especially during election periods and crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
The CBS survey results align with broader European trends showing increased public awareness about digital misinformation. The European Union has responded with initiatives like the Digital Services Act, which places greater responsibility on platforms to address false information and illegal content.
As digital literacy continues to evolve in the Netherlands, these findings suggest a population becoming increasingly discerning about the information they consume online—a development that may have significant implications for how media organizations, technology companies, and government institutions communicate with the public.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
8 Comments
While I’m not shocked by these findings, it’s still disappointing to see public trust in social media deteriorating so rapidly. We need to find better ways to combat the spread of false information online.
These findings are a wake-up call. As we increasingly rely on digital sources for news and information, we must be vigilant about separating fact from fiction. Improving online content moderation should be a key focus.
The growing skepticism toward online information is understandable. With so much misinformation circulating, it’s important for people to critically evaluate the sources and veracity of what they see on social media.
The decline in social media credibility is a complex issue with no easy solutions. But it’s clear that more needs to be done to combat misinformation and rebuild trust in digital spaces. What do you think are the most effective approaches?
This is concerning, but not surprising. Social media platforms have struggled with credibility and misinformation issues for years. It’s good to see people becoming more discerning about online content.
This poll highlights the need for greater media literacy and fact-checking efforts. Social media companies must take stronger action to address the spread of false and misleading content on their platforms.
It’s disheartening to see social media’s credibility plummeting. These platforms have a responsibility to ensure the integrity of the information they host. Restoring public trust should be a top priority.
The decline in social media credibility is a worrying trend. Reliable information is crucial, especially on important issues. I hope platforms and policymakers can work to restore public confidence in digital spaces.