Listen to the article
Conspiracy theories, misinformation and speculation about coronavirus have flooded social media. But who starts these rumours? And who spreads them?
BBC specialist reporter Marianna Spring and the BBC Trending team have conducted an extensive investigation into the origins and propagation of COVID-19 misinformation, analyzing hundreds of misleading stories that have circulated since the pandemic began.
Their research reveals seven distinct profiles of individuals who create and disseminate false information about the coronavirus, each with different motivations and methods.
The investigation comes at a critical time when health authorities worldwide continue to battle not just the virus itself, but what the World Health Organization has termed an “infodemic” – an overabundance of information, both accurate and false, that makes it difficult for people to find trustworthy guidance when needed.
“Understanding who spreads misinformation and why is crucial to combating it effectively,” Spring noted during her investigation. “What we’ve found is that there isn’t just one type of person responsible – it’s a complex ecosystem of different actors with varying intentions.”
The profiles identified range from deliberate bad actors seeking financial or political gain to well-meaning individuals who share false information out of genuine concern for their communities. The investigation also found that many coronavirus conspiracy theories cross political divides, attracting believers from various ideological backgrounds.
Social media platforms have become the primary battleground for this information war. Despite efforts by companies like Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube to label or remove misleading content, false narratives continue to spread rapidly, often morphing and adapting to evade detection.
Public health officials have expressed concern about the real-world impact of such misinformation. Several countries have reported incidents of individuals refusing to follow health guidelines or rejecting vaccination based on false claims they encountered online. In some cases, misinformation has led to dangerous behaviors, including the consumption of harmful substances falsely promoted as coronavirus cures.
The BBC investigation also revealed how coronavirus misinformation often piggybacks on existing conspiracy theories or exploits genuine concerns about government overreach, creating a more complex challenge for fact-checkers and authorities trying to promote accurate information.
“What makes coronavirus misinformation particularly dangerous is how it exploits uncertainty,” explained one digital media expert consulted for the BBC report. “During a pandemic, when scientific understanding is evolving and governments are making difficult decisions with imperfect information, the environment is ripe for alternative narratives to take hold.”
The research shows that misinformation spreads most effectively when it contains a kernel of truth or connects to legitimate concerns, making it more believable to audiences already primed to be skeptical of official sources. This “information laundering” makes debunking particularly challenging.
Spring’s investigation also explored the psychological factors that make people vulnerable to misinformation, including confirmation bias, the need for simple explanations during complex crises, and the powerful emotional pull of content that generates fear or outrage.
Media literacy experts have praised the BBC’s approach of focusing on the human element behind misinformation rather than just debunking individual claims. “Understanding the motivations and types of people who spread misinformation helps us develop more targeted interventions,” said one academic specializing in digital media literacy.
As the pandemic continues to evolve, the battle against misinformation remains a critical component of the global public health response. The BBC’s investigation provides valuable insight into this ongoing challenge, highlighting the need for multifaceted approaches that address both the content of misinformation and the human factors that drive its creation and spread.
The full investigation, including detailed profiles of the seven types of misinformation spreaders, has been published as part of the BBC’s ongoing coverage of the coronavirus pandemic and its wider societal impacts.
Verify This Yourself
Use these professional tools to fact-check and investigate claims independently
Reverse Image Search
Check if this image has been used elsewhere or in different contexts
Ask Our AI About This Claim
Get instant answers with web-powered AI analysis
Related Fact-Checks
See what other fact-checkers have said about similar claims
Want More Verification Tools?
Access our full suite of professional disinformation monitoring and investigation tools


16 Comments
This analysis offers valuable insights into the complex dynamics behind viral misinformation. For industries like mining and energy, where public perceptions and trust are so crucial, combating falsehoods will be an ongoing challenge.
Absolutely. Maintaining transparency, engaging stakeholders, and relying on authoritative sources will be essential to navigating the ‘infodemic’ in these sectors.
As a mining and commodities investor, I’m curious to see how this analysis could apply to misinformation around topics like rare earth metals, lithium, or uranium. Those sectors seem ripe for speculation and conspiracy theories.
That’s a good point. Resource scarcity and geopolitical tensions around critical minerals could create fertile ground for the spread of misinformation in those industries.
This is an important issue for the mining and commodities industries, which can be targeted by misinformation due to their technical complexity and high-stakes geopolitical dynamics. Fact-based communication and transparency will be key.
Agreed. Building trust through reliable information and engagement with stakeholders will be critical to counter the spread of falsehoods in these sectors.
As an investor in mining and energy equities, I’m concerned about the potential impact of misinformation on market sentiment and decision-making. Fact-checking and discernment of reliable sources will be crucial.
That’s a valid concern. Misinformation can lead to poor investment decisions and market volatility, underscoring the need for robust information hygiene in these industries.
I’m skeptical of the motivations behind some of these misinformation actors. Profit, ideology, and attention-seeking seem to be common drivers, which is concerning for industries like mining that can have significant public impact.
That’s a fair assessment. The mix of financial, political, and personal incentives makes the misinformation ecosystem very complex to navigate and combat effectively.
As an energy analyst, I’m curious to see how this analysis could apply to misinformation around topics like uranium mining, renewable energy sources, or the energy transition more broadly. Those areas seem ripe for speculation and conspiracy theories as well.
Good point. The energy sector, with its complex geopolitical and technological factors, likely faces similar challenges in combating misinformation. Rigorous fact-checking will be crucial.
This is an interesting look at the different types of individuals propagating misinformation. Understanding the motivations and methods behind viral falsehoods is important to combat the ‘infodemic’ effectively.
Agreed, the ecosystem of actors spreading misinformation is complex. Identifying the various profiles can help target mitigation strategies more precisely.
The ‘infodemic’ is a major challenge, especially for industries like mining that can be opaque and technical. Clear, fact-based communication from trusted sources will be crucial to counter misinformation.
Agreed. Transparency and proactive education from industry and government will be key to cutting through the noise and providing reliable information.