Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

In today’s digital landscape, navigating through the constant stream of information has become increasingly challenging. A recent Guardian study revealed that far-right populists are significantly more likely to spread fake news on social media compared to politicians from mainstream or far-left parties. This finding underscores a troubling trend: the deliberate amplification of misinformation has become an integral strategy for radical right movements.

With information available around the clock through social media platforms, news websites, and messaging apps like WhatsApp and Telegram, the public faces a growing struggle to separate fact from fiction. The UK riots last summer and current events unfolding in the US highlight how quickly false information can spread and influence public behavior.

“Understanding the distinction between misinformation and disinformation is crucial for today’s media consumers,” says media literacy expert Dr. Sarah Johnson. “While misinformation refers to false information shared regardless of intent, disinformation is deliberately created to deceive.”

Disinformation takes many forms, from fabricated reports to AI-generated images and misleading headlines. During the COVID-19 pandemic, for example, conspiracy theories linking 5G towers to virus transmission gained traction, resulting in actual vandalism of telecommunications infrastructure across the UK and other countries. This incident demonstrates how fake news can translate into dangerous real-world consequences.

The challenge often lies in our tendency to trust information shared by people we know or stories that align with our existing beliefs. This psychological phenomenon, known as confirmation bias, makes us particularly vulnerable to manipulation.

Media experts recommend several strategies for identifying fake news. First and foremost is questioning the source. Established news organizations like the BBC, ITV, The Guardian, and The Times adhere to strict editorial standards and face legal accountability for their reporting. In contrast, anonymous websites or unverified social media accounts warrant greater skepticism.

“Always check if the content is current and properly contextualized,” advises digital literacy coordinator Mark Thompson. “Old stories are frequently recycled and presented as breaking news to generate outrage.”

Another red flag is the absence of verifiable evidence. Legitimate reporting typically includes direct quotes, references to studies, or links to credible sources. Stories lacking such substantiation often aim to provoke emotional reactions rather than inform.

Fact-checking resources provide valuable tools for verification. UK-based fullfact.org and international sites like factcheck.org, Reuters Fact Check, and Snopes offer reliable assessments of questionable content. These platforms have become essential resources for those seeking to confirm information before accepting or sharing it.

Social media algorithms present additional challenges by prioritizing content that generates engagement, regardless of accuracy. Content that triggers strong emotional responses—particularly anger or outrage—often receives greater visibility, creating fertile ground for disinformation campaigns.

“If you want to reduce exposure to fake news in your feeds, avoid engaging with sensationalist content,” recommends social media analyst Jennifer Moore. “Even clicking on dubious stories signals to algorithms that you want to see similar content in the future.”

Individual responsibility extends beyond personal consumption habits. When family members or friends share questionable information, experts suggest respectfully questioning the source or explaining why the content appears suspicious. This approach can help create a more informed community.

Media literacy advocates emphasize that combating disinformation requires collective effort. By developing critical thinking skills, verifying information before sharing, and encouraging others to do the same, individuals can help limit the spread of harmful fake news.

As disinformation techniques grow increasingly sophisticated, especially with advances in artificial intelligence, the ability to distinguish between reliable and unreliable information has never been more important. This skill set has evolved from a useful capability to an essential component of responsible digital citizenship in today’s interconnected world.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

8 Comments

  1. Amelia P. Garcia on

    Identifying false information is so important these days. It can be really challenging to separate fact from fiction with all the misinformation out there. Glad to see guidance on how to spot and verify information.

  2. Amelia Jackson on

    The point about the difference between misinformation and disinformation is critical. Knowing the intent behind the false information is key to understanding its impact and how to address it. Media literacy is crucial.

    • James Hernandez on

      Absolutely, the intent behind the false information is a key distinction. Disinformation that’s deliberately created to deceive is far more dangerous than simple misinformation.

  3. Elijah Thompson on

    Appreciate the breakdown of the differences between misinformation and disinformation. Understanding the intent behind false information is key. We all need to be more vigilant consumers of media and information.

  4. Elizabeth Miller on

    This is a timely and important topic. The speed at which false information can spread, especially on social media, is really concerning. Developing critical thinking skills to identify and verify information is crucial for everyone.

  5. Interesting to see the data about right-wing populists being more likely to spread fake news. Speaks to the political motivations behind a lot of the disinformation we see these days. Fact-checking is more important than ever.

  6. James G. Williams on

    The examples of the UK riots and current US events highlight just how impactful the spread of misinformation can be. It’s a sobering reminder of the real-world consequences. Grateful for resources to help navigate this landscape.

    • Yes, the real-world impacts are what make this issue so serious. Misinformation can incite violence and disrupt society. Equipping people with the tools to verify information is a vital step.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.