Listen to the article
X, formerly Twitter, has emerged as the social media platform with the highest proportion of disinformation among six major networks, according to a recent European Commission study. The research examined over 6,000 unique social media posts across Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, TikTok, X, and YouTube, providing a comprehensive snapshot of misleading content circulation in digital spaces.
The investigation specifically targeted three European nations considered particularly vulnerable to disinformation campaigns: Spain, Poland, and Slovakia. These countries were selected due to their upcoming elections or geographic proximity to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, factors that historically correlate with increased disinformation efforts.
According to the findings, X demonstrated the highest “ratio of discoverability” for disinformation—a metric that measures what proportion of sensitive content contains false or misleading information. At the opposite end of the spectrum, YouTube displayed the lowest ratio among the platforms studied, suggesting more effective content moderation systems or different audience behaviors.
EU Values and Transparency Commissioner Vera Jourova issued a stern warning to X following the publication of these results. “My message for X is: you have to comply with the hard law. We’ll be watching what you’re doing,” Jourova stated, signaling increased regulatory scrutiny for the platform.
The study comes at a critical juncture for social media regulation in Europe. The Digital Services Act (DSA), which took effect earlier this year, imposes strict requirements on major platforms regarding content moderation, particularly around disinformation that could threaten public discourse or democratic processes. Under the DSA, platforms face potential fines of up to 6% of their global turnover for non-compliance.
Since Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter in late 2022 and its subsequent rebranding to X, the platform has undergone significant operational changes, including substantial reductions in content moderation staff. Critics have suggested these cutbacks may have contributed to the findings in the Commission’s study, though X has consistently maintained that its automated systems are capable of handling content review effectively.
The European Commission’s research methodology involved analyzing both the prevalence of disinformation and how discoverable such content was to average users. This approach aims to understand not just what exists on these platforms but how likely users are to encounter problematic content during normal browsing activities.
Spain, one of the countries under study, has recently experienced heightened political tensions and polarization, creating fertile ground for disinformation campaigns. Poland’s position as a frontline NATO state bordering Ukraine makes it a frequent target for geopolitically motivated disinformation. Slovakia, which held elections earlier this year, saw significant disinformation activity around voting processes and candidates.
Social media experts note that different platform architectures may partially explain the varying disinformation rates. X’s chronological feed and retweet functionality can potentially amplify content more rapidly than YouTube’s recommendation algorithm, which has undergone numerous adjustments in recent years specifically to address problematic content.
The BBC has approached X for comment on the findings, but no response had been received at the time of reporting.
This study represents part of a broader European effort to understand and combat digital disinformation, particularly as the continent faces multiple elections in the coming year. With democratic processes increasingly influenced by online discourse, European regulators have signaled their intention to hold platforms accountable for the content they host and amplify.
Industry observers will be watching closely to see how X responds to these findings and whether the platform implements additional measures to reduce disinformation on its service.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
12 Comments
The study’s finding that YouTube had the lowest ratio of disinformation is encouraging. Effective content moderation appears to be key in limiting the spread of fake news across social media platforms.
Yes, YouTube’s performance suggests their policies and processes may be more robust compared to other networks. This is an important benchmark as platforms continue to grapple with disinformation challenges.
Interesting to see the EU’s findings on disinformation being most prevalent on X platform. With upcoming elections and the Ukraine conflict, it’s critical to have effective content moderation to limit the spread of false or misleading information.
I agree, the report highlights the challenges platforms face in combating disinformation, especially during sensitive political events. It will be important for regulators and tech companies to work together on solutions.
This report underscores the need for ongoing vigilance and improvement in content moderation capabilities across social media. Disinformation can have serious real-world impacts, especially around elections and geopolitical events.
Absolutely. Proactive steps by platforms and regulators will be crucial to safeguard the integrity of information flows and public discourse in the digital age.
The EU’s findings provide important insights into the evolving landscape of digital disinformation. As technology and user behaviors continue to shift, ongoing monitoring and adaptable solutions will be crucial.
The report’s focus on upcoming elections and the Ukraine conflict as factors driving increased disinformation efforts is alarming. Platforms must be vigilant in protecting the integrity of democratic processes.
I’m curious to learn more about the specific factors that contribute to the higher levels of disinformation on X platform compared to others. Is it a structural issue, user behavior, or something else?
The finding that X has the highest ‘ratio of discoverability’ for disinformation is concerning. Social media platforms must continue to refine their approaches to identify and limit the spread of false or misleading content.
It’s encouraging to see the EU taking a proactive approach to studying and addressing disinformation across major social media platforms. This type of research can inform policy and drive much-needed improvements.
While the report focuses on Europe, the issue of disinformation on social media is a global challenge. I wonder how the trends and patterns identified in this study compare to other regions around the world.