Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

White House Revises US-India Trade Deal Factsheet, Removes Pulses Reference

The White House has made significant revisions to its factsheet on the recently announced US-India trade agreement, removing key references to pulses and digital services taxation. The changes, made on Tuesday, represent notable adjustments to how the deal is being presented to the public and stakeholders.

The original factsheet, titled “The United States and India Announce Historic Trade Deal (Interim Agreement),” was published on Monday, shortly after both nations announced the framework for what they described as a reciprocal and mutually beneficial trade arrangement. However, just one day later, the document underwent substantial modifications on sensitive trade points.

Among the most notable changes, the White House removed “certain pulses” from the list of agricultural products on which India had reportedly agreed to reduce tariffs. The original document had specifically included pulses alongside other items such as tree nuts, soybean oil, wine, and spirits. Pulses, which include lentils, chickpeas, and beans, represent a politically sensitive agricultural sector in India, where domestic production is crucial for food security.

The revised factsheet also altered language regarding digital trade. The initial version had suggested India would scrap digital services taxes, but the updated document now states more cautiously that India is “committed to negotiate a robust set of bilateral digital trade rules.” Additionally, references to “rules that prohibit the imposition of customs duties on electronic transmissions” were entirely removed from the document.

These modifications appear to align the factsheet more closely with the joint statement released by both countries last week, which made no mention of pulses among items targeted for tariff reduction. The changes suggest potential sensitivities or ongoing negotiations around these specific trade areas.

In another subtle but potentially significant adjustment, the revised factsheet changed language around India’s purchasing commitments. Where the original document stated India “committed” to buying over $500 billion in American products, the new version states India merely “intends” to make such purchases. This softer language provides more flexibility in how binding these purchasing targets might be considered.

The specific products mentioned in this potential $500 billion purchasing arrangement include US energy products, information and communication technology, coal, and other goods over an unspecified timeframe. The joint statement from last week had specified this would occur “over the next 5 years” and included additional items such as aircraft, aircraft parts, and precious metals.

Trade experts suggest these revisions might reflect diplomatic sensitivity around how the deal is being portrayed to domestic audiences in both countries. For India, pulses represent a critical agricultural sector with millions of farmers dependent on stable prices. Meanwhile, digital services taxation remains a complex international issue with significant revenue implications for both nations.

The factsheet modifications were first highlighted by former Indian Home Secretary Sanjeev Gupta in a post on social media platform X (formerly Twitter), drawing attention to the discrepancies between versions.

The US-India trade relationship has grown increasingly important for both countries in recent years, with bilateral trade exceeding $190 billion annually. This interim agreement represents a step toward addressing long-standing trade frictions, though the revisions to the factsheet suggest certain elements remain works in progress.

Analysts note that the changes highlight the complex balancing act required when finalizing international trade agreements, particularly between major economies with different domestic priorities and sensitivities.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

10 Comments

  1. The rapid revisions to the trade deal factsheet highlight the dynamic nature of these negotiations. Removing the pulses reference suggests some last-minute adjustments were needed to reach an interim agreement.

    • You raise a good point. Navigating the political sensitivities around agricultural products is likely a key challenge in these trade negotiations. The revisions suggest both sides are still working to find the right balance.

    • Agreed, the pulses removal is an interesting change. India likely wanted to protect that sensitive agricultural sector, so it makes sense the White House would remove that detail from the factsheet.

  2. Interesting to see the White House making quick revisions to the India-US trade deal factsheet. Curious to learn more about the changes, especially around the pulses reference. Seems like a politically sensitive area for India.

  3. This seems like an important development in the India-US trade relationship. The quick turnaround on the factsheet revisions indicates there’s still some fine-tuning happening. It will be worth watching how the final agreement shapes up.

  4. It’s noteworthy that the White House felt the need to make such significant changes to the trade deal document in just 24 hours. This speaks to the complexity of the issues being discussed and the delicate balance both sides are trying to strike.

  5. The quick revisions to the trade deal factsheet underscore the importance of getting the details right, especially on sensitive issues like agricultural products. It will be interesting to see how the final agreement takes shape.

    • Amelia Q. Martin on

      Absolutely. The removal of the pulses reference in particular points to the need to accommodate India’s domestic sensitivities around certain agricultural products. These types of concessions are likely critical to making progress on the broader trade agreement.

  6. Elijah U. Rodriguez on

    The White House’s revisions to the trade deal document are intriguing. Removing the pulses reference could signal some last-minute compromises or tradeoffs being made. I’m curious to see how this impacts the overall agreement.

  7. The revisions to the trade deal document highlight the complexity of these negotiations. Removing the pulses reference suggests there may have been some last-minute adjustments on agricultural products. I wonder what other changes were made.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.