Listen to the article
In a significant political development, Vice President Sara Duterte faces renewed impeachment proceedings, marking the second attempt to remove her from office in less than two years.
The House of Representatives has initiated new impeachment complaints against Duterte in February 2026, with the House justice committee deeming two separate complaints sufficient in form and substance on March 2 and 4, respectively. Following this determination, Duterte was served a notice on March 5, giving her 10 days to respond to the allegations, though she has yet to submit her answer.
These current proceedings should not be confused with the previous impeachment effort. In February 2025, Duterte became the first vice president in Philippine history to be impeached by the House when 215 lawmakers—more than the required one-third of House members—endorsed an impeachment complaint against her. However, that impeachment was later declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, which cited the “one-year bar rule” specified in Article XI, Section 3(5) of the Constitution, preventing impeachment proceedings from being initiated against the same official more than once within a one-year period.
The new complaints were filed only after this one-year prohibition had lapsed. One complaint came from a group of clergy members, while another was submitted by lawyer Nathaniel Cabrera.
The impeachment petitions cite multiple serious allegations against the Vice President, including misuse of confidential funds, bribery of education officials, making apparent threats against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. and his family, and questions regarding her unexplained wealth.
This renewed impeachment effort represents a continued political challenge for Duterte, whose family has long been a powerful force in Philippine politics. Her father, Rodrigo Duterte, served as the country’s president from 2016 to 2022.
Some confusion about the timeline of events has circulated on social media. A Facebook video posted on March 1 by an account named Toto Leomel has garnered substantial attention—117,000 views, 2,000 reactions, 280 shares, and 210 comments. The video shows a GMA News report about Duterte’s impeachment but fails to clarify that the footage is from the 2025 proceedings, not the current ones, leading many viewers to believe it represents the latest developments.
The House justice committee now has 60 session days from February 23 to issue a decision on the current impeachment complaints. This timeframe gives lawmakers until approximately late May to determine whether to advance the case to the Senate for trial or dismiss the complaints.
Political analysts note that these proceedings come amid increasing tensions between Duterte and the Marcos administration, highlighting the fragmentation of what was once considered a powerful political alliance. The outcome could significantly reshape political alignments as the country approaches the next election cycle.
Progressive groups and civil society organizations have been vocal supporters of the impeachment efforts, arguing that accountability for high-ranking officials is essential for democratic governance. Meanwhile, Duterte’s supporters maintain that the charges are politically motivated attempts to undermine her position and influence.
As the proceedings continue, they will likely intensify public discourse about accountability, governance, and the political future of one of the country’s most prominent political families.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
8 Comments
While the allegations are serious, the use of a fabricated news report as the basis is troubling. I hope the investigation looks at all the facts and evidence before reaching any conclusions.
The impeachment claims based on a fabricated news report from 2025 are concerning. It’s important that such claims are thoroughly investigated to determine the facts and prevent the spread of misinformation. I hope the truth comes to light.
The fact that the previous impeachment was deemed unconstitutional raises doubts about the legitimacy of these new proceedings. I’ll be following this story closely to see how it unfolds.
It’s troubling to see the Vice President facing a second impeachment attempt in such a short time frame. I wonder if there is a deeper political agenda at play here. The public deserves a transparent and objective investigation into the merits of these claims.
The previous impeachment being declared unconstitutional raises questions about the legitimacy of these new proceedings. I hope the House and the Supreme Court can work together to ensure a proper and lawful process is followed.
Interesting developments around the Vice President’s impeachment. Given the past unconstitutional proceedings, I’m curious to see how the new case will unfold and what the grounds are. Hopefully it will be a fair and transparent process.
This situation highlights the need for robust checks and balances in the political system. I hope the relevant authorities can uphold the rule of law and ensure a fair and transparent process.
These impeachment proceedings against the Vice President seem politically charged. I’d like to see the specific allegations and evidence presented, rather than relying on unverified reports. A fair and impartial process is crucial for upholding democratic principles.