Listen to the article
A senior lyricist Javed Akhtar has clarified that he does not support Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar’s controversial action of removing a Muslim woman’s hijab during a public event, contrary to misleading claims circulating on social media.
The controversy erupted after a video from a government function in Patna on December 15 showed Kumar removing the hijab of a Muslim woman doctor on stage during a ceremony for distributing appointment letters. The incident sparked immediate backlash from political parties, social organizations, and citizens across India, with many condemning it as an insensitive violation of the woman’s religious freedom and personal dignity.
Amid the growing outcry, social media users began circulating a video of Javed Akhtar discussing his views on face coverings, falsely claiming that he had endorsed Kumar’s actions. The misleading post, shared by a Facebook user named Ravindra Bharati on December 18, was captioned: “Whatever Nitish Kumar did was right. What is the need to cover the face? — Javed Akhtar (lyricist and screenwriter).”
An investigation by fact-checking organization Vishvas News has revealed this claim to be false. The viral video featuring Akhtar was recorded at the SOA Literary Festival’s inauguration ceremony on November 29, weeks before the hijab incident occurred. In the video, Akhtar was responding to an audience member’s question about societal attitudes toward face coverings in general, not specifically addressing Kumar’s actions.
In the full context of the literary festival video, Akhtar expressed his views on dress codes, saying: “Why should one be ashamed of one’s face? I agree that very revealing clothes, whether worn by men or women, do not look decent… However, why should a woman hide her face? What is there in a woman’s face that is objectionable?”
Far from supporting Kumar, Akhtar took to social media on December 18 to explicitly condemn the Chief Minister’s behavior. On his official Twitter (now X) account, Akhtar wrote: “Everyone who knows me even in the most cursory manner knows how much I am against the traditional concept of Parda but it doesn’t mean that by any stretch of imagination I can accept what Mr. Nitish Kumar has done to a Muslim lady doctor. I condemn it in very strong words.”
The veteran lyricist further stated that Kumar should apologize to the woman for his actions.
Senior journalist Smita Srivastava, who covers Bollywood for Dainik Jagran, confirmed to fact-checkers that the viral video predated the controversy and had no connection to the incident involving Kumar.
The misleading claim appears to be part of a wider pattern of misinformation surrounding the hijab controversy, which has intensified political and social debates about religious expression and women’s rights in India. The incident comes at a sensitive time in Bihar politics, where religious and cultural issues often become flashpoints for broader political debates.
This fact-check serves as a reminder of how easily out-of-context statements can be manipulated on social media to create false narratives around contentious political events, particularly those involving religious and cultural practices.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


7 Comments
It’s concerning to see political figures making decisions that infringe on personal religious freedoms. Transparency and respect for diversity should be the priority in these matters.
While I understand the complexities around religious dress codes, forcibly removing someone’s hijab during an official event seems like an overreach. Hopefully this can lead to a constructive dialogue on balancing individual liberties and cultural sensitivities.
As a mining and commodities enthusiast, I’m curious to learn more about how this type of political controversy could potentially impact related industries and investments. Factual, unbiased reporting will be key.
This seems like a concerning incident where personal religious freedoms were violated. I hope the situation is resolved fairly and respectfully for all involved.
The claims made in the viral video appear to be misleading and false. It’s important to verify information, especially around sensitive topics like religious practices and individual rights.
Agreed. Spreading misinformation can inflame tensions and undermine important discussions. Fact-checking is crucial in these situations.
This case highlights the need for nuanced, evidence-based discussions around sensitive cultural and religious issues. Jumping to conclusions or spreading misinformation rarely leads to positive outcomes.