Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Potential Trade Deal Could End Years of U.S.-China Economic Friction

A long-awaited trade deal between the United States and China could soon be signed during President Donald Trump’s trip to Asia, according to U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, marking what could be a major turning point after months of economic warfare between the world’s two largest economies. Both countries have suffered economic fallout from the sweeping tariffs, which have reshaped global trade flows and driven up costs for businesses and consumers alike.

Currently, the United States is charging at least 10% on virtually all imports, a baseline tariff that’s been in place since April 2, according to the White House. But certain nations have been hit much harder. Data from the Tax Policy Center shows countries like India and Brazil are facing tariffs of roughly 50% once all additional layers are factored in.

China remains a central target, with new 100% tariffs on Chinese cargo-handling equipment set to take effect on November 9. That could change soon, depending on how trade talks play out this week, and whether the Supreme Court decides to uphold or strike down the president’s tariff authority altogether. The decision from SCOTUS is expected as early as next week.

While some nations have faced steep penalties, America’s closest allies have managed to secure more favorable terms. Under a U.S.–U.K. Economic Prosperity Deal, Britain’s exports remain subject to just 10% tariffs, the lowest level under the new trade policy. Japan, following a similar agreement in September, will see most of its goods taxed at 15%, still higher than before, but far below the rates imposed on countries like India or Brazil.

Despite the revenue boost from tariffs, estimated at $2.5 trillion over the next decade by the Tax Policy Center, economists warn that the tariffs could cost the average American family about $2,600 a year, as importers pass costs down to consumers.

The latest developments come as Bessent confirmed on social media platform X that the U.S. and China have mapped out the framework for a trade deal, ahead of President Trump’s meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping on Thursday. But this moment has been decades in the making.

China’s entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001 was seen as a win-win at the time, according to the Council on Foreign Relations. The U.S. gained access to cheaper goods, while American companies looked forward to selling into China’s vast market. But over time, the scales tipped.

As China’s manufacturing sector exploded, U.S. factories struggled to compete. Economists dubbed it the “China Shock,” referring to the millions of American manufacturing jobs that vanished as production shifted overseas. Between 1999 and 2011 alone, nearly 6 million factory jobs were lost, with about 1 million directly linked to Chinese competition, according to the Council on Foreign Relations.

The turning point came in 2018, when the Trump administration launched sweeping Section 301 tariffs targeting $350 billion worth of Chinese imports, citing intellectual property theft, forced technology transfers, and unfair state subsidies, according to the Office of the United States Trade Representative. China retaliated with tariffs of its own, sparking a trade war that continues to reverberate through global markets today.

The tariff policy has had far-reaching consequences across multiple industries. U.S. manufacturers who rely on Chinese components have seen input costs rise significantly. American farmers, particularly soybean producers, were hit hard when China imposed retaliatory tariffs on agricultural products. Some companies responded by relocating production from China to countries like Vietnam and Mexico, creating new trade patterns that may persist even if tensions ease.

Despite the friction, China remains one of America’s most important trading partners, accounting for about 13% of all U.S. imports. And while tariffs have raised revenue, they’ve also rippled across supply chains, pushing up prices for everything from electronics to machinery.

With the possibility of a new trade deal on the horizon, the stakes couldn’t be higher. If an agreement is reached, it could ease years of tension and stabilize key supply chains. But if negotiations falter, or if the Supreme Court challenges the president’s trade powers, the tariff landscape could shift yet again, reshaping the global economy once more.

Market analysts suggest that industries most affected by tariffs—including technology, manufacturing, and agriculture—would see immediate benefits from a trade deal. Stock markets in both countries would likely respond positively to any signs of resolution, though questions remain about enforcement mechanisms and whether deeper structural issues in the trading relationship can truly be resolved.

Verify This Yourself

Use these professional tools to fact-check and investigate claims independently

Reverse Image Search

Check if this image has been used elsewhere or in different contexts

Ask Our AI About This Claim

Get instant answers with web-powered AI analysis

👋 Hi! I can help you understand this fact-check better. Ask me anything about this claim, related context, or how to verify similar content.

Related Fact-Checks

See what other fact-checkers have said about similar claims

Loading fact-checks...

Want More Verification Tools?

Access our full suite of professional disinformation monitoring and investigation tools

9 Comments

  1. Hopefully the US and China can reach a deal that ends the trade war. The economic fallout has been significant for businesses and consumers. A resolution would be welcome news.

  2. Elijah Hernandez on

    While the trade war has been damaging, I hope the two sides can find common ground. Trillions in economic value are at stake, so a pragmatic solution is needed.

    • Linda F. Brown on

      Absolutely. A comprehensive trade deal that protects domestic industries while also facilitating healthy competition and cross-border commerce would be the best outcome.

  3. The commodity markets have really felt the impact of the trade tensions. A deal that reduces uncertainty and restores stability would be welcome news for miners and producers.

  4. Amelia Thompson on

    This trade dispute has had major ripple effects across many industries and commodities. A deal that reduces tariffs and tension would be a positive for the global economy.

  5. The economic warfare has been tough on businesses and consumers. While the issues are complex, I hope both sides can come to an agreement that benefits all.

  6. Isabella D. Lopez on

    It will be interesting to see if the Supreme Court weighs in on the president’s tariff authority. That could have major implications for the future of US-China trade relations.

  7. The tariffs have been disruptive, but I’m curious to see what the final trade agreement looks like. Compromise from both sides will be key to finding a sustainable solution.

    • Agreed, a balanced deal that addresses key issues for both the US and China would be ideal. Avoiding an escalation of the trade war is crucial.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2025 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved. Designed By Sawah Solutions.