Listen to the article
In a heated political exchange, Senator Rand Paul has challenged President Donald Trump’s justification for recent U.S. military strikes on vessels in the Caribbean Sea and Pacific Ocean, highlighting potential risks of such operations when targeting suspected drug runners.
During an October 19 appearance on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” the Kentucky Republican questioned the administration’s approach, pointing to Coast Guard data to support his concerns. “About 25% of the time the Coast Guard boards a ship, there are no drugs,” Paul stated, arguing that a policy of destroying all suspected drug-running vessels could lead to attacking innocent parties.
Paul’s statement comes in response to Trump’s claim that the U.S. strikes on eight vessels, primarily Venezuelan, were legally justified because they were transporting drugs bound for American shores. The military operations have reportedly resulted in more than 30 fatalities, yet the Trump administration has not provided evidence confirming the presence of drugs on these vessels.
The Coast Guard’s fiscal year 2024 report supports Paul’s assertion. According to the document, the agency successfully intercepted drugs in approximately 73% of vessel boarding operations during that period, meaning about 27% yielded no illicit substances. This figure aligns closely with Paul’s 25% claim.
The data shows improvement in the Coast Guard’s interception success rate over recent years. When the agency began tracking this metric in fiscal year 2021, the drug disruption rate was 59%, meaning 41% of searched vessels had no drugs. This figure rose to 64% in 2022, 69% in 2023, and reached 73% in 2024—the highest since data collection began, though still short of the agency’s 80% annual goal.
However, experts caution that interpreting this statistic requires nuance. Jonathan Caulkins, a Carnegie Mellon University drug policy researcher, raised questions about how the Coast Guard defines a “drug disruption.” For instance, it remains unclear whether boarding a vessel with a known drug trafficker but no actual drugs, or approaching a vessel that jettisons drugs overboard before interception, would count as successful disruptions.
More importantly, experts note that the Coast Guard’s general statistics might not directly apply to the specific vessels targeted in the recent military strikes. “The people with fingers on the trigger may demand a much higher certainty rate before shooting,” Caulkins explained. “So, even if the senator’s figure were correct when looking across all the many, very diverse operations over the course of a year, that doesn’t mean it applies to the special case of boats of Venezuela.”
The controversy is amplified by the administration’s lack of transparency regarding the type or quantity of drugs allegedly aboard the targeted vessels, or whether they were actually bound for the United States.
Drug policy experts have previously noted that Venezuela plays a relatively minor role in the trafficking of drugs that reach American shores. Most illicit fentanyl in the U.S. comes from Mexico, not Venezuela, and typically enters the country through official ports of entry along the southern border, often smuggled by U.S. citizens.
A 2025 Coast Guard report evaluating agency data from fiscal years 2021 through 2023 found potential issues with data accuracy, noting that some reports lacked drug seizure results or required documentation.
Paul’s statement highlights the broader debate about appropriate maritime law enforcement procedures. He contrasted the military strikes with standard protocol, noting, “When you stop people at sea in international waters, or in your own waters, you announce that you’re going to board the ship and you’re looking for contraband, smuggling or drugs. This happens every day off of Miami.”
While Paul’s statistical claim stands on solid ground, experts emphasize that without knowing the specific intelligence that led to the military strikes, it’s impossible to determine whether the same error rate would apply in these particular cases.
Verify This Yourself
Use these professional tools to fact-check and investigate claims independently
Reverse Image Search
Check if this image has been used elsewhere or in different contexts
Ask Our AI About This Claim
Get instant answers with web-powered AI analysis
Related Fact-Checks
See what other fact-checkers have said about similar claims
Want More Verification Tools?
Access our full suite of professional disinformation monitoring and investigation tools
6 Comments
Interesting debate on the risks and evidence behind these military strikes on suspected drug boats. Senator Paul raises a valid point about the high rate of boats without drugs being boarded. More transparency on the specifics of these operations would help evaluate their justification and impacts.
Agreed, the administration should provide clearer evidence to support these claims and actions. Indiscriminate attacks on suspected drug runners could endanger innocent lives.
Senator Paul’s use of the Coast Guard’s own data to challenge the administration’s narrative is a strong move. It’s concerning if a quarter of boarded ships have no drugs, as that suggests a high risk of targeting innocent parties. This deserves further investigation.
Agreed, the Coast Guard’s own statistics raise serious doubts about the accuracy and validity of these strikes. The administration needs to provide more compelling evidence to justify the loss of life involved.
This highlights the importance of careful oversight and verification when conducting military operations, especially those involving potential loss of life. The Coast Guard data seems to undermine the administration’s claims, raising concerns about the accuracy and necessity of these strikes.
Absolutely, we need to ensure these operations have proper justification and don’t result in unnecessary casualties. Transparency and accountability are critical when it comes to the use of military force.