Listen to the article
Trump Claims He Prevented Death of Pakistan’s Prime Minister, Citing Support of “35 Million People”
Former President Donald Trump made a striking claim during a recent White House address, stating that “35 million people said the Prime Minister of Pakistan would have died if it were not for my involvement.” The remark was captured in the full video of the address, available on The White House’s official YouTube channel.
The statement came as part of a wide-ranging address covering numerous topics including immigration, defense, economic policies, healthcare initiatives, tax reforms, and even referencing the assassination of conservative figure Charlie Kirk.
The Associated Press, in its published transcript of the address, confirmed Trump’s exact wording regarding the claimed support of 35 million people crediting him with saving the Pakistani Prime Minister’s life.
This isn’t the first time Trump has positioned himself as a critical diplomatic figure in South Asian affairs. He has previously claimed significant involvement in de-escalating tensions between India and Pakistan, two nuclear-armed neighbors with a long history of conflict over territorial disputes, particularly regarding the Kashmir region.
However, these claims have been met with skepticism from official channels. On June 18, 2025, India’s Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) released Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri’s statement regarding a telephone conversation between Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. While the exact content of Misri’s statement wasn’t detailed in the source material, its release suggests an effort by Indian officials to clarify the nature and scope of diplomatic communications.
Diplomatic relations between India and Pakistan have remained tense for decades, with periodic flare-ups of hostility. The two nations have fought multiple wars since gaining independence in 1947, and border skirmishes along the Line of Control in Kashmir continue to be a source of bilateral friction.
Trump’s claims of intervention in South Asian diplomacy align with his broader pattern of asserting personal influence in international conflicts. During his presidency, he frequently emphasized his ability to forge relationships with world leaders and positioned himself as a unique diplomatic force capable of resolving long-standing international disputes.
International relations experts have noted that while U.S. presidents often play mediating roles in conflicts between other nations, verifiable diplomatic achievements typically involve multiple stakeholders, documented agreements, and formal processes rather than individual interventions.
Pakistan, a country of approximately 240 million people, has experienced significant political instability in recent years, with prime ministers facing numerous challenges including security threats. The country has also dealt with economic hardships, political polarization, and the ongoing influence of military institutions in governance.
Trump’s specific reference to “35 million people” supporting his claim lacks clear context. Pakistan’s total population far exceeds this number, raising questions about the source and meaning of this figure.
The former president’s statement comes amid heightened focus on foreign policy issues as political discussions increasingly center on America’s role in global affairs, particularly in regions of strategic importance like South Asia.
While presidential addresses routinely cover domestic policy concerns such as immigration and healthcare, Trump’s inclusion of such specific foreign policy claims highlights the continued emphasis on international relations in American political discourse.
As with many claims about diplomatic interventions, verification remains challenging without corroborating statements from relevant governments and diplomatic channels. Neither the Pakistani government nor any other official sources were cited in the original material as confirming Trump’s assertion about saving the Pakistani Prime Minister.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
9 Comments
Wow, if true, that would be an impressive diplomatic accomplishment. However, the lack of corroborating information raises doubts. I wonder what the context was and if there are any official records or statements from other parties involved. Without that, it’s hard to evaluate the credibility of Trump’s assertion.
Saving a foreign leader’s life is a significant accomplishment, if true. However, the lack of supporting evidence raises doubts. I wonder if this is more political posturing than actual fact. It would be helpful to see credible sources corroborating the specifics of Trump’s alleged involvement and impact.
Trump often makes bold claims that are difficult to verify. While he may have been involved in some diplomatic efforts in the region, saving a foreign leader’s life seems like an extraordinary assertion without clear proof. I’d be curious to learn more about the specifics, if any.
Trump is known for making grand, unverified claims. While diplomacy can involve delicate behind-the-scenes work, preventing an assassination is an extraordinary feat that typically leaves a paper trail. Unless more concrete details emerge, I’m inclined to view this as another embellished statement from the former president.
This sounds like another unsubstantiated claim from the former president. Diplomatic interventions can be complex, but preventing an assassination would typically involve multiple governments and agencies, not just one individual. Unless there’s more verifiable information, I’m skeptical of the details here.
Preventing the death of a foreign leader is a significant claim that deserves scrutiny. While Trump has been involved in some regional diplomacy, this seems like an exaggeration without clear evidence. I’d be interested to learn more about the specifics, but for now I remain skeptical of the details.
Interesting if true, but the lack of corroborating evidence is concerning. Diplomatic interventions can be complex, so I’d want to see confirmation from multiple reliable sources before accepting this claim. Curious to learn more about the context and Trump’s specific role, if any.
Interesting claim, though I haven’t seen any credible evidence to support it. Preventing a political assassination would be a major diplomatic achievement, so it’s surprising there’s no independent confirmation. I wonder what the context was and if there’s more to the story we’re missing.
This is a pretty bold claim that requires substantiation. Preventing a political assassination would be a major diplomatic achievement, so I’d expect to see some official documentation or statements from other involved parties. Without that, it’s hard to evaluate the veracity of Trump’s assertion.