Listen to the article
Former President Trump Calls Texas Democrat Talarico’s Beliefs an “Insult to Jesus”
In a heated escalation of political rhetoric, former President Donald Trump characterized the beliefs of Texas Democratic Senate candidate James Talarico as an “insult to Jesus” during a March 13 interview on Fox News’ “The Brian Kilmeade Show.”
The controversial remarks came as Trump veered from a discussion about the upcoming Texas Republican Senate runoff between incumbent Sen. John Cornyn and challenger Ken Paxton to comment on the Democratic primary race, which Talarico won on March 3.
“The good news is their candidate [Talarico] is whacked out,” Trump stated during the call-in appearance. “With his six different forms of gender and all the things that I saw. The insult to Jesus. I mean, such an insult.”
Trump continued his critique, calling Talarico “beyond woke” and “grossly incompetent,” suggesting that Republicans had strategically waited for Talarico to win the primary before releasing damaging information about him.
The former president doubled down on his comments in a March 22 social media post, where he criticized Talarico for supposedly supporting “six Genders, insults to Jesus, only vegan food,” and noted that the candidate “was wearing a mask in 2023 and 2024.”
LGBTQ+ news outlets, including LGBTQ Nation and the Dallas Voice, characterized Trump’s statements as an attack on transgender rights. The controversy appears to stem from Talarico’s 2021 statement defending transgender athletes, which has recently recirculated in conservative media following his primary victory.
Talarico, who defeated U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett for the Democratic Senate nomination, responded to Trump’s comments during a March 18 speech that he later shared on social media.
“The president of the United States just said that I insulted Jesus,” Talarico said. “You wanna know what insults Jesus? Kicking the sick off their health care while cutting taxes for billionaires. You know what insults Jesus? Deporting the stranger and separating babies from their mothers.”
The Texas state representative continued by criticizing policies he associated with Trump, including military actions abroad and handling of the Epstein case, before acknowledging, “I am not a perfect Christian; I don’t claim to be. There’s only been one perfect Christian and he was crucified on a cross 2,000 years ago.”
The exchange highlights the increasingly religious framing of political discourse as the 2026 election season heats up. Trump’s invocation of Jesus in his criticism of a political opponent follows a pattern of religious appeals that have become common in American political rhetoric, particularly when addressing social issues related to gender and sexuality.
Political analysts note that this type of messaging typically resonates with evangelical Christian voters, a key constituency in Trump’s previous electoral victories and a demographic that both parties are actively courting in Texas.
The controversy emerges as both parties position themselves for what is expected to be a highly competitive Texas Senate race, with Republicans hoping to maintain their grip on a seat they’ve held for decades and Democrats seeking to capitalize on demographic changes in the state.
Neither Trump’s team nor Talarico’s campaign responded to requests for additional comment on the exchange at the time of publication.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
14 Comments
While I understand Trump’s concerns about the potential impact on religious beliefs, I’m not sure it’s helpful to characterize Talarico’s views as an ‘insult to Jesus.’ That seems like an inflammatory and divisive statement. Thoughtful dialogue is needed on these complex social issues.
I agree. Rhetoric that is overly charged or dismissive is unlikely to foster productive discussions. It would be better to focus on the substance of the policy proposals and their potential effects, rather than attacking the person.
This is a complex and emotionally charged topic. I think it’s important to avoid making sweeping generalizations or personal attacks, and instead try to understand the nuances of the different perspectives. What specific policy proposals from Talarico is Trump referring to, and how does he believe they conflict with Christian values?
That’s a fair point. The details and reasoning behind Trump’s criticism would be helpful to evaluate. Simply labeling Talarico’s views as an ‘insult’ doesn’t provide much clarity. A more measured and fact-based discussion could shed light on the core issues at hand.
It’s concerning to see political figures making such charged statements about someone’s personal beliefs. While I may not agree with all of Talarico’s views, I think it’s important to avoid demonizing him or his supporters. A more balanced and fact-based discussion could shed light on the core issues at hand.
I agree. Resorting to inflammatory language and personal attacks is unlikely to lead to productive dialogue. If Trump has specific policy concerns, it would be better to articulate those in a more measured way and engage in substantive discussion of the issues.
The remarks from Trump on Talarico’s transgender beliefs seem to be another example of the increasingly polarized political discourse. While I may not agree with all of Talarico’s positions, I think it’s important to avoid demonizing him or his supporters and instead focus on the substance of the policy proposals and their potential impacts on the community.
I agree. Resorting to personal attacks and inflammatory language is unlikely to lead to constructive dialogue. If Trump has specific policy concerns, it would be better to articulate those in a more measured way and engage in a thoughtful debate of the issues, rather than dismissing Talarico’s views as an ‘insult to Jesus’.
This seems to be another example of the polarized political climate, where divisive rhetoric often takes precedence over nuanced discussion of complex social issues. While I may not agree with all of Talarico’s positions, I think it’s important to avoid inflammatory language and instead focus on the substance of the policy proposals and their potential impacts.
I concur. Resorting to personal attacks or dismissive language is unlikely to lead to productive dialogue. If Trump has specific concerns about Talarico’s positions, it would be better to articulate those concerns objectively and engage in a thoughtful debate of the issues.
Interesting comments from Trump on Talarico’s transgender beliefs. It’s a sensitive topic that seems to have struck a nerve with the former president. I’m curious to hear more details on the specific claims he made.
Yes, Trump’s remarks are quite polarizing. I think it’s important to approach this issue objectively and avoid knee-jerk reactions, and instead try to understand the nuances and perspectives from all sides.
This seems to be another example of the increasingly polarized political landscape, where nuanced discussion of complex social issues is often replaced by divisive rhetoric and personal attacks. While I may not agree with all of Talarico’s positions, I think it’s important to avoid demonizing him or his supporters and instead focus on the substance of the policy proposals and their potential impacts.
Absolutely. Resorting to inflammatory language and dismissive characterizations is unlikely to foster productive dialogue. If Trump has specific concerns about Talarico’s positions, it would be better to articulate those concerns objectively and engage in a thoughtful debate of the issues.