Listen to the article
In a rare departure from his comfort zone of friendly MAGA-aligned media outlets, former President Donald Trump sat down with CBS’s “60 Minutes” for an interview with Norah O’Donnell. The appearance raised eyebrows, coming shortly after Trump had sued the very same network for alleged “election interference” related to their interview with Vice President Kamala Harris.
The interview, which aired Sunday, quickly became noteworthy for Trump’s numerous factual inaccuracies rather than for any policy revelations. CNN fact-checker Daniel Dale documented a substantial list of false claims made by the former president during the broadcast.
Among the most glaring misstatements, Trump insisted grocery prices “are down” even after O’Donnell corrected him with current inflation data. He claimed $17 trillion is currently being invested in the United States, a figure that nearly doubles even the White House’s most optimistic economic projections.
Trump’s historical assertions proved equally problematic. He stated that recent former presidents had invoked the Insurrection Act “28 times,” though historical records show President Ulysses S. Grant holds the record with just six invocations. Trump also boasted about ending “eight wars,” listing conflicts that experts note weren’t actually wars.
On economic matters, Trump repeated his often-debunked claim that foreign countries pay his tariffs, when economic research consistently shows American importers bear those costs and frequently pass them on to consumers. He also falsely characterized the inflation he inherited upon taking office in 2017 as the “worst of all time,” despite it being 3% — the same rate as currently and significantly lower than the 9.1% peak during the Biden administration.
The interview’s context carries additional significance given the recent settlement between CBS’s parent company, Paramount, and Trump over his lawsuit regarding the Harris interview. Paramount agreed to pay $16 million toward Trump’s future presidential library, despite not admitting any wrongdoing or issuing an apology.
Media analysts have questioned this settlement, suggesting it resembled more of a strategic financial decision than an acknowledgment of journalistic error. The timing coincided with Paramount’s pending merger with Skydance Media, a company with leadership connections to Trump.
During the “60 Minutes” interview, Trump himself acknowledged awareness that his interview would be edited, just as Harris’s had been. At one point, he even suggested certain comments could be edited out, saying, “You don’t have to put this on, because I don’t want to embarrass you.”
The interview has intensified scrutiny of CBS’s editorial independence following its parent company’s settlement with Trump. Media watchdogs and journalism ethics experts have expressed concern about the potential chilling effect such settlements might have on political reporting during an election year.
For viewers, the interview offered little new information about Trump’s policy positions, instead serving primarily as a showcase of his communication style and relationship with factual information—a pattern that continues to define his political presence as the November election approaches.
As both campaigns enter their final weeks, the “60 Minutes” appearance underscores the ongoing challenge for journalists and media organizations: how to effectively interview high-profile political figures while maintaining journalistic standards and ensuring accurate information reaches voters.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
11 Comments
It’s disappointing to see a former president make so many verifiably false claims, even in a high-profile interview setting. Accurate information on economic and historical issues is vital for public discourse.
Interesting to see Trump’s interview on 60 Minutes. Seems like he made a number of questionable claims about grocery prices, economic investments, and presidential history. I’ll have to look into the fact-checking on those statements.
Yeah, the fact-checker highlighted some significant inaccuracies in Trump’s remarks. Good to see the media holding him accountable, even in a more friendly setting.
I’m always skeptical of politicians making sweeping economic claims, especially ones that seem to contradict established figures. Fact-checking these kinds of statements is important for citizens to make informed decisions.
Agreed. It’s concerning when political figures dismiss credible data and push their own narrative, even in high-profile interviews. Rigorous fact-checking is essential for a healthy democracy.
Grocery prices and inflation are important kitchen-table issues. I’m curious to hear more details on the specific claims Trump made and how they compare to the actual data.
It’s concerning when political figures make demonstrably false statements, even in high-profile interviews. I hope the public can distinguish truth from fiction, especially on important economic and historical issues.
Agreed. Fact-checking is crucial to maintain an informed electorate. The media plays a vital role in holding leaders accountable, regardless of political affiliation.
The discrepancies between Trump’s statements and the actual facts highlighted in this article are quite stark. I hope the public will take the time to carefully evaluate the claims made by all political figures.
Absolutely. An informed citizenry is the foundation of a healthy democracy. Fact-checking and holding leaders accountable, regardless of party, is crucial.
While I appreciate Trump sitting down for an interview outside his usual circles, the number of false claims is troubling. Maintaining truth and accuracy in public discourse should be a top priority.