Listen to the article
US President Donald Trump’s claim that he is sending a hospital ship to treat widespread illness in Greenland has sparked controversy and drawn a sharp rebuke from the territory’s prime minister.
In a Truth Social post on Sunday, Trump announced he was dispatching a hospital vessel to the semiautonomous Danish territory, claiming many Greenlanders were “sick and not being taken care of.” He added that the ship was “on the way,” suggesting an immediate deployment was underway.
However, at the time of Trump’s announcement, both of the US Navy’s hospital ships—the USNS Mercy and USNS Comfort—were undergoing maintenance at a shipyard in Mobile, Alabama. Ship tracking data revealed that the Mercy did set sail on Wednesday, though Pentagon officials declined to comment on its destination. The Comfort is scheduled to remain in the shipyard through April, according to government contracts.
Government records indicate the Mercy is slated for additional repairs in Oregon next month. Even if the vessel were directed to Greenland, it would require considerable preparation time, as hospital ships typically need to be staffed with medical personnel from military facilities near their home ports before deployment.
The announcement represents the latest friction point with Greenland, which Trump has frequently expressed interest in acquiring during his presidency. The Arctic territory, home to approximately 57,000 people, is strategically important due to its location and natural resources.
Greenlandic Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen swiftly defended his country’s healthcare system in response to Trump’s assertions. “We have a public health care system where treatment is free for citizens. That is a deliberate choice—and a fundamental part of our society,” Nielsen stated. In a pointed critique of American healthcare, he added, “That is not how it works in the USA, where it costs money to see a doctor.”
Greenland maintains a universal healthcare system centered around the Queen Ingrid Hospital in the capital city of Nuuk, supplemented by regional health centers throughout the territory. For Greenlandic citizens and permanent residents, most healthcare services—including treatment by doctors, specialists, hospitals, prescription medications, and dental care—are provided free of charge.
Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry, whom Trump named as his “special envoy” to Greenland, supported the president’s claims, stating on social media that “many villages and small towns lack basic services that Americans often take for granted.” He highlighted that smaller settlements often lack permanent doctors and specialized care, forcing residents to travel long distances for treatment.
While Greenland does face healthcare challenges in its remote regions, the territory utilizes telemedicine to reach isolated communities. Patients requiring specialized care unavailable locally can be transported to the national hospital or, in complex cases, flown to Denmark at government expense.
Public health experts acknowledge that Greenland faces significant health issues, many stemming from its rapid transition “from a hunting society to a modern industrial and knowledge society.” Conditions such as obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease have become increasingly prevalent. The territory also experiences staffing shortages, with the health minister recently posting an “urgent” request for dentists in several towns.
Despite these challenges, Greenland has made substantial healthcare improvements since assuming responsibility for its own system in 1992. Professor Lene Seibæk from the University of Greenland notes that life expectancy increased by approximately six years for men and five to six years for women since the 1990s, now exceeding global averages at 71 and 77 years respectively.
The controversy underscores ongoing tensions between Trump and Greenland, a NATO ally’s territory that continues to navigate the complex relationship between maintaining its autonomy and engaging with larger global powers.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
10 Comments
Interesting claim about a hospital ship going to Greenland, but it seems the details don’t quite add up. Both US Navy hospital ships are currently undergoing maintenance, so it’s unclear how one could be dispatched there immediately as Trump suggested. Curious to see how this develops.
You’re right, the logistics of rapidly deploying a hospital ship to Greenland seem dubious based on the information provided. It will be worth following up to see if any concrete plans materialize.
While the idea of sending a hospital ship to Greenland to address health concerns is noble, the practical logistics seem quite dubious based on the details provided. It will be important to closely follow any developments on this story to understand the full picture.
While the idea of sending a hospital ship to Greenland to address health concerns is well-intentioned, the feasibility of such a move seems doubtful based on the information provided. It will be important to closely follow any developments on this story to understand the full context and whether there are any realistic plans in the works.
This announcement about a hospital ship heading to Greenland raises more questions than answers. With the ships undergoing repairs, it’s unclear how one could be dispatched there immediately as claimed. It will be worth monitoring any updates to see if this proposal gains any traction or if it was simply an unfounded claim.
Sending a hospital ship to Greenland to address health concerns is a novel idea, but the timing and feasibility seem questionable given the ships’ current maintenance status. I wonder what the motivation behind this proposal is, and whether it’s truly a viable solution.
Good point. There may be more to this story than meets the eye. It would be interesting to understand the full context and rationale behind the proposed hospital ship deployment to Greenland.
Interesting that President Trump is proposing to send a hospital ship to Greenland, but the timing and feasibility seem questionable given the current maintenance status of the US Navy’s hospital ships. I wonder what prompted this announcement and whether there are any concrete plans in the works.
The proposed hospital ship deployment to Greenland seems questionable given the current maintenance status of the US Navy’s hospital vessels. It would be helpful to have more details on the rationale and logistics behind this plan. Curious to see if any concrete steps are taken to follow through on this announcement.
This announcement about a hospital ship heading to Greenland sounds a bit puzzling. With the ships currently undergoing repairs, it’s hard to see how they could be dispatched there immediately as claimed. It raises questions about the accuracy of the information and the broader motivations behind this proposal.