Listen to the article
President Trump announced Wednesday that Israel and Hamas had reached an agreement on the first phase of his 20-point plan to end the Gaza conflict, a development that quickly sparked controversy when White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt publicly challenged Fox News over its reporting on U.S. military involvement in the deal.
The confusion began Thursday evening when Fox News posted on X: “BREAKING: US troops headed to Israel to support historic peace deal.” Within 20 minutes, Leavitt issued a forceful rebuttal, writing: “This is NOT true and taken out of context. To be clear: up to 200 U.S. personnel, who are already stationed at CENTCOM, will be tasked with monitoring the peace agreement in Israel, and they will work with other international forces on the ground.”
The 28-year-old press secretary’s correction immediately generated confusion among social media users, with many pointing out that her clarification essentially confirmed the core of Fox’s report – that American military personnel would indeed be supporting the peace agreement in Israel.
“Then it is true and you just provided more details,” responded one user, while another questioned: “How can one thing be not true and be taken out of context at the same time?”
The agreement, which President Trump described as the “first phase” of his plan, involves the release of Israeli hostages in exchange for Palestinians held in Israeli jails. Secretary of State Marco Rubio reportedly informed Trump about the deal during a White House meeting, enabling the president to announce it publicly.
According to The New York Times, the 200 U.S. personnel will establish a civil-military coordination center in Israel to provide security and humanitarian support. These troops, already stationed with United States Central Command (CENTCOM) – which oversees military operations across the Middle East, North Africa, Central Asia, and parts of South Asia – are not intended to enter Gaza itself.
Fox News eventually issued a follow-up post about 45 minutes after Leavitt’s rebuke, offering additional context: “BREAKING: The U.S. plans to utilize up to 200 troops already in the middle east to help support and monitor the ceasefire deal in Gaza as part of a team involving various nations, a senior official told Fox News.”
Political analysts suggest Leavitt’s swift and public correction may have been motivated by concerns that the original Fox News framing could create the impression of a significant new deployment of American forces to the Middle East – potentially contradicting the Trump administration’s “America First” approach and stated opposition to expanded foreign military commitments.
The peace deal represents a potential breakthrough in the long-running Gaza conflict, with President Trump securing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s backing for the ceasefire arrangement. The agreement’s implementation will now be partially monitored by American military personnel working alongside international partners.
The episode highlights the sensitivities surrounding U.S. military involvement in the region and the Trump administration’s careful messaging around the scope and nature of American support for the peace process. It also demonstrates the sometimes tense relationship between the White House communications team and media outlets, even those generally considered friendly to the administration.
As the ceasefire implementation begins, attention will focus on whether the agreement holds and leads to further diplomatic progress in the troubled region, potentially bolstering President Trump’s foreign policy credentials as he navigates his second term in office.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
7 Comments
This is an interesting development regarding the Gaza conflict. It’s good to see attempts at brokering a peace deal, even if the details are still being worked out. I’m curious to learn more about the role of U.S. personnel in monitoring the agreement.
The clarification from the White House press secretary provides some helpful context. It seems the U.S. troops are already stationed in the region and will be assisting with the monitoring, rather than being newly deployed for this purpose.
The confusion over the initial Fox News report highlights how important it is for all sides to communicate clearly and accurately, particularly when it comes to matters of international diplomacy and national security. I hope the parties involved can work together constructively to solidify a lasting peace agreement.
While it’s encouraging to see progress on the Gaza conflict, the back-and-forth over the details shows how quickly narratives can take on a life of their own in the modern media landscape. Fact-checking and responsible reporting are essential to ensuring the public has a clear understanding of these complex geopolitical developments.
Anytime there’s a potential breakthrough in a longstanding conflict like this, it’s worth paying close attention. The Fox News report and the White House response highlight how quickly information can spread and get misinterpreted these days. Careful scrutiny of the facts is important.
You make a good point. It’s crucial that the details of any peace agreement are accurately reported and understood by the public. Fact-checking efforts, even when they involve political figures, serve an important purpose in these situations.
This seems like a complex situation with a lot of moving parts. I appreciate the White House clarifying the specifics around the U.S. military’s involvement. Maintaining transparency and providing the correct information is key, especially when it comes to sensitive issues like this.