Listen to the article
Protesters on bicycles, in the nude, have become an unexpected focal point in the ongoing tensions over federal deployment in Portland, Oregon, as House Speaker Mike Johnson characterized them as “the most threatening thing” he’s seen during recent protests.
Johnson made the controversial remarks during an October 14, 2025, news conference while addressing questions about oversight of federal law enforcement in Portland. The statement has since circulated widely on social media platforms, drawing both criticism and support.
“I’ve not seen them [federal law enforcement] cross the line yet and we have committees that are jurisdiction who have that responsibility, but it’s not risen to that level,” Johnson stated. “What I’ve seen is the abuse of law enforcement by radical leftist activists. You know, most recently, the most threatening thing I’ve seen yet was the naked bicyclers in Portland who were protesting ICE down there. I mean, it’s getting really ugly.”
Johnson further claimed that protesters had “physically assaulted officers” and that “people have been arrested,” describing the situation as “serious business.” However, credible news outlets have not reported any physical assaults on law enforcement by participants in the naked bike protest.
The protest in question occurred on October 12 as an “emergency edition” of Portland’s World Naked Bike Ride, an annual event that began in 2004. While traditionally focused on environmental action, community building, and body positivity, this special gathering was explicitly organized to oppose President Donald Trump’s plans to deploy federal troops to the city.
According to local news outlet KPTV, participants made their motivation clear, with one cyclist stating, “We’re here because we strongly believe that we do not need federal troops in Portland.”
The World Naked Bike Ride organization issued a statement about the October protest on social media, saying: “On Sunday, October 12th, Portlanders will be riding their bikes in the n*de to protest the militarization of our city, the genocide in Palestine, and the injustices of our broken and systemically cruel immigration system.”
The statement continued by explaining the group’s perception of the federal deployment: “We must understand that Trump targeted Portland not because he genuinely thinks our city is war-torn, but because he knows that Portland is the center of a vibrant anti-fascist movement, with dozens of orgs and thousands of individuals working together in ways that directly threaten him and the systems that brought him to power.”
The World Naked Bike Ride has grown substantially since its inception, reportedly reaching as many as 10,000 participants in peak years (2014, 2015, and 2019), though the exact number of cyclists participating in the October 2025 demonstration remains unclear.
Portland residents began protesting Trump’s intentions to deploy National Guard troops in late September 2025. Some protesters adopted various costumes and theatrical displays, seemingly attempting to contradict the Trump administration’s characterization of the city as being under siege by “premeditated anarchy.”
The administration had claimed that “what’s happening in Portland isn’t protest; it’s premeditated anarchy that has scarred the city for years — leaving officers battered, citizens terrorized, and property defaced.”
The legal battle over the deployment continues. A federal judge temporarily blocked Trump’s National Guard deployment plans in early October 2025, ruling that the president had “exceeded his constitutional authority.”
Johnson’s characterization of naked protesters as the “most threatening” element in Portland raises questions about the proportionality of the federal response and reflects the deeply polarized perspectives on what constitutes legitimate protest versus public disorder.
As tensions continue in Portland, the nude cyclists have unwittingly become emblematic of the broader national debate over federal intervention in local law enforcement matters, the right to protest, and the boundaries of political expression.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
10 Comments
Interesting to see the Speaker’s reaction to the nude cycling event. I’m curious to learn more about the context and motivations behind this form of protest. Regardless of one’s views, it’s important to approach these issues with nuance and avoid inflammatory language.
Well said. Dismissing the protesters as ‘threatening’ without engaging with their concerns is unlikely to resolve the underlying tensions. An open and balanced dialogue is needed to find constructive solutions.
The naked cycling event in Portland sounds like a provocative form of protest, though I’m not sure it’s as ‘threatening’ as the Speaker claims. Peaceful civil disobedience can push boundaries, but the focus should be on addressing the underlying issues, not the optics.
I agree, the language of ‘threatening’ seems overblown. As long as the protesters remain nonviolent, their right to free expression should be protected, even if the methods are unconventional.
The Speaker’s comments about the ‘naked bicyclers’ seem to reflect a more general tendency to focus on the optics of protest rather than the substance. While the nudity may be provocative, it’s important to keep the discussion grounded in the real issues at hand.
Absolutely. Resorting to charged language like ‘threatening’ only serves to further polarize the situation. A more measured, empathetic approach would be more constructive in addressing the root causes of the unrest.
This is a complex issue with valid concerns on both sides. While I understand the Speaker’s view, equating nudity with ‘threatening’ behavior seems to miss the point. The real threat is the systemic issues that have led to these protests in the first place.
Exactly. Focusing on the shock value of the protest tactics distracts from the substantive grievances that are driving people to take such dramatic actions in the first place.
I appreciate the Speaker’s concern for public safety, but I’m not convinced that the nude cycling event poses a genuine ‘threat’. This seems like an attempt to delegitimize a form of protest that is clearly meant to be provocative and push the boundaries of acceptable dissent.
Agreed. While the optics may be jarring, the real issue here is the underlying tensions and grievances that have driven these protesters to take such dramatic action. Dismissing their concerns as ‘threatening’ is unlikely to resolve the situation constructively.