Listen to the article
As the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie continues to unfold, the case has ignited fresh concerns about kidnappings for ransom in the United States, prompting experts to weigh in on their frequency and typical patterns.
Ransom kidnappings represent the least common type of hostage situation in the country, according to Scott Tillema, a retired SWAT hostage negotiator from Illinois. While the FBI maintains comprehensive records of kidnapping cases, their public data does not specifically categorize cases where ransom is the sole motive.
For context, Department of Justice research reveals that “stereotypical” stranger abductions of children—instances where a child is taken, held, or transported by an unknown person—occur approximately 100 times annually across the nation. With roughly 72 million children in the United States, this translates to a risk factor of about 1 in 720,000, highlighting the extreme rarity of genuine stranger abductions.
Guthrie was abducted from her residence in Tucson’s Catalina Foothills, approximately 90 minutes from the U.S.-Mexico border, leading to speculation about potential cartel involvement. A former Pima County Sheriff’s Department lieutenant acknowledged this possibility but characterized it as unlikely, according to Newsweek reports.
The FBI’s El Paso Field Office has previously issued warnings about increases in cartel-connected kidnapping and extortion schemes in border regions. However, authorities have not officially linked any cartel activity to Guthrie’s disappearance.
Law enforcement officials continue their intensive search, meticulously examining vegetation and surrounding areas near Guthrie’s home. The investigation remains active as authorities pursue leads and gather evidence.
While ransom kidnappings remain uncommon in the United States, historical cases have demonstrated how such incidents can capture worldwide attention when they do occur, often involving substantial ransom demands and complex negotiations.
In 1983, Hong Kong billionaire Teddy Wang was kidnapped with approximately $11 million reportedly paid to secure his release, according to the South China Morning Post. Tragically, when abducted again in 1990, his family reportedly paid about $34 million, but Wang never resurfaced, as reported by The New York Times.
The United States has its own history of high-profile abduction cases. In 1974, heiress Patty Hearst was kidnapped by the Symbionese Liberation Army, which demanded millions in food distribution programs. Her family ultimately provided approximately $2 million in aid, according to The New York Times.
A year earlier, in 1973, John Paul Getty III was abducted in Italy. After kidnappers demanded $17 million and mailed part of his ear to a newspaper, his family eventually paid a reduced ransom of about $2.2 million, Stanford Magazine reported. Getty was subsequently released after five months in captivity.
Criminal justice experts note that most kidnappings in the United States involve family disputes, custody battles, or other personal relationships rather than stranger abductions for financial gain. The FBI’s resources are often deployed for high-risk abduction cases, with specialized units trained in negotiation tactics for hostage situations.
Security analysts point out that wealthy individuals and prominent families sometimes employ private security measures and receive specialized training to mitigate kidnapping risks, particularly when traveling internationally where such crimes may be more prevalent.
Despite the sensationalized nature of ransom kidnapping cases when they occur, federal data consistently indicates that stranger abductions, especially those motivated by ransom demands, remain exceptionally rare in the United States. The Guthrie case stands out precisely because it appears to represent this unusual category of crime, which explains both the intense public interest and the significant law enforcement resources dedicated to resolving it.
As the investigation continues, authorities urge the public to report any potential sightings or information while cautioning against speculation that might hinder their efforts.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


16 Comments
Silver leverage is strong here; beta cuts both ways though.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Exploration results look promising, but permitting will be the key risk.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Interesting update on Most High-Profile Ransom Cases: Frequency and Notable Examples. Curious how the grades will trend next quarter.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
If AISC keeps dropping, this becomes investable for me.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Good point. Watching costs and grades closely.
Interesting update on Most High-Profile Ransom Cases: Frequency and Notable Examples. Curious how the grades will trend next quarter.
Silver leverage is strong here; beta cuts both ways though.
Interesting update on Most High-Profile Ransom Cases: Frequency and Notable Examples. Curious how the grades will trend next quarter.
Nice to see insider buying—usually a good signal in this space.
The cost guidance is better than expected. If they deliver, the stock could rerate.