Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

In a striking example of social media misinformation, claims that “Stranger Things” star Millie Bobby Brown donated $1 million to the LGBTQIA+ community while hoping they would “find a cure” have been definitively debunked as satire.

The false claim originated from an X (formerly Twitter) account named @DropPopNet in a post dated October 26, 2025. The post alleged: “Actress Millie Bobby Brown donated $1,000,000 to the LGBTQIA+ community. ‘I hope they find a cure,’ the actress stated.”

Fact-checkers quickly identified the post as fictional, noting that @DropPopNet explicitly labels itself as a parody account. The account’s bio clearly states that “all content is satirical and not factual,” a critical disclaimer that many who shared the content failed to notice or deliberately ignored.

This isn’t the first time Brown has been targeted with fabricated homophobic statements. Dating back to 2018, the young actress has repeatedly found herself at the center of manufactured controversy, with social media users attributing false anti-LGBTQIA+ statements to her. These campaigns have occasionally gained traction despite having no basis in reality.

Media analysts point out that this pattern represents a concerning trend in celebrity misinformation, where public figures — particularly young women in entertainment — become unwitting pawns in polarizing culture war narratives.

“Celebrities like Brown are easy targets because their fame guarantees engagement with posts mentioning them, regardless of accuracy,” explains media researcher Dr. Sarah Henderson. “When combined with inflammatory topics like LGBTQ+ issues, the posts generate significant attention, which is exactly what these accounts want.”

Had Brown actually made such a substantial donation accompanied by such controversial remarks, it would have generated widespread coverage across mainstream media outlets. Exhaustive searches across major news platforms, including Google News and Yahoo’s comprehensive news index, reveal no legitimate reporting of either the purported donation or the inflammatory statement.

The persistence of these false narratives highlights the challenges faced by celebrities in the digital age, where misinformation can spread rapidly before fact-checking occurs. Brown, who rose to fame as a child actor in the Netflix series “Stranger Things,” has previously spoken about the difficulties of navigating fame and public scrutiny at a young age.

Social media platforms continue to struggle with effectively labeling satire and parody content, despite implementing various fact-checking measures. Even when accounts explicitly identify themselves as non-factual sources, their content is frequently shared without context, leading to widespread misunderstanding.

Digital literacy experts emphasize the importance of checking source credibility before sharing content online. “Always look for verification from multiple reliable sources before believing sensational claims about public figures,” advises media literacy advocate Jason Reynolds. “Particularly when the claims seem designed to provoke strong emotional reactions.”

As this incident demonstrates, the line between satire and misinformation often blurs in social media environments, where context can easily be lost and inflammatory content tends to travel faster than corrections. For celebrities like Brown, these fabricated controversies represent an unfortunate and seemingly inevitable aspect of modern fame.

Representatives for Brown have not commented on this specific incident, though they have previously denounced similar fabricated statements attributed to the actress.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

7 Comments

  1. It’s concerning to see this kind of misinformation spreading, especially about a young actress like Millie Bobby Brown. I’m glad the fact-checkers were able to quickly debunk this false claim. We need to be vigilant in verifying information online before sharing it.

  2. This is a good example of why we should always be skeptical of claims that seem too outrageous or unbelievable, even if they align with our own beliefs. It’s important to take the time to verify information from credible sources before sharing it.

  3. Patricia Williams on

    I’m glad the fact-checkers were able to quickly identify this claim as satire and debunk it. It’s a good reminder that we need to be vigilant about the information we consume and share, especially when it comes to high-profile individuals like Millie Bobby Brown.

  4. It’s disheartening to see the continued attempts to smear Millie Bobby Brown with false claims about her views and actions. As the article notes, this isn’t the first time she’s been the target of such campaigns. We need to do better at combating the spread of misinformation.

  5. I’m not surprised to hear that Millie Bobby Brown has been the target of these kinds of fabricated controversies. Young celebrities seem to be particularly vulnerable to this type of online harassment. It’s a good reminder to be cautious about what we believe and share online.

  6. Oliver Hernandez on

    Wow, this is a clear example of how harmful and misleading satirical content can be when it’s taken out of context. It’s important for social media users to always check the source and validity of any claims, even if they align with their own views.

    • Absolutely. Fact-checking and media literacy are crucial skills in today’s digital landscape. Spreading misinformation, even unintentionally, can have real consequences.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.