Listen to the article
False Photo Identification Spreads Misinformation About ICE Shooting Victim
A misleading social media claim has been circulating online, falsely identifying a person in drag as Alex Pretti, the 37-year-old man who was fatally shot by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents in Minnesota. Fact-checking reveals this identification is entirely incorrect.
The viral post, which appeared on Facebook account @TrueReactionary on January 25, 2026, displays two images side by side with a caption suggesting media bias in coverage of Pretti. The post claims: “THE PIX ON THE LEFT IS THE PIX THE PRESS ALWAYS USES. I WONDER WHY THEY DON’T USE THE PIX ON THE RIGHT? THEIR NARRATIVE IS, HE WAS JUST A NORMAL GUY SAVING LIVES AT THE HOSPITAL. WELL… HE DOESN’T LOOK ALL THAT NORMAL TO ME.”
However, the person shown in the right image—wearing a silver skirt and bra with rainbow-colored hair while holding a beer—is not Alex Pretti. The individual is actually Kyle Wagner, a self-described Antifa supporter from Minneapolis. The photo has no connection whatsoever to Pretti, making the entire premise of the post factually inaccurate.
The incident comes amid heightened tensions following Pretti’s shooting death by ICE agents, which has sparked protests and heated online discourse across political lines. The circulation of false imagery appears designed to discredit the victim and shape public opinion about the controversial shooting.
Wagner himself posted a video of Pretti’s shooting on his personal Facebook page on January 24, 2026, expressing outrage over the incident. His post included hashtags such as #antifa, #fucktrump, #minneapolis, and #fuckice, positioning himself as an activist against the actions of immigration enforcement officials.
“Do not pretend like this is far away or anyone other than a normal average American… citizen that was standing up for their… first amendment right,” Wagner wrote in his post, which included several politically charged statements and calls to action.
The misidentification exemplifies a troubling pattern of misinformation that often emerges following high-profile incidents, particularly those with political dimensions. Such false claims can rapidly spread across social media platforms, potentially influencing public perception before fact-checkers can intervene.
Digital misinformation experts point to this case as typical of how images are repurposed during controversial events to support particular narratives. The juxtaposition of images, coupled with all-caps text and emotionally charged language, represents common tactics used to amplify misleading content on social platforms.
The circumstances surrounding Pretti’s death continue to be investigated by authorities. Reports indicate he was shot during an ICE operation in Minnesota, though complete details about the incident remain under review. Law enforcement agencies have faced increased scrutiny nationwide regarding use of force, particularly in immigration enforcement operations.
This incident underscores the importance of verifying information before sharing or accepting claims made on social media, especially those concerning high-profile or politically sensitive events. Digital literacy experts recommend consulting multiple reputable news sources and official statements rather than relying on unverified social media posts for information about developing news stories.
As investigations into Pretti’s death continue, the spread of misinformation presents additional challenges for authorities attempting to maintain public trust while conducting a thorough review of the incident. Community leaders in Minnesota have called for transparency in the investigation process and responsible discussion of the case in both traditional and social media.
The false identification, while debunked, demonstrates how quickly misinformation can spread in today’s digital landscape and highlights the ongoing challenges faced by both the public and media in separating fact from fiction in emotionally charged situations.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
16 Comments
This case highlights the need for greater scrutiny of online claims and the importance of relying on credible, fact-based sources of information.
Well said. Fact-checking and responsible reporting are essential to combat the spread of misinformation and ensure the public is informed accurately.
It’s disappointing to see social media posts trying to discredit the victim and spread disinformation. We should focus on the facts and respect the memory of those who lost their lives.
Well said. Maintaining empathy and integrity in the face of misinformation is crucial during difficult times.
This is a disturbing case of mistaken identity and misinformation. It’s important to verify facts and avoid spreading unsubstantiated claims, especially around such a tragic incident.
Agreed. Fact-checking is crucial to combat the spread of false information and maintain journalistic integrity.
The use of misleading images and captions to push a narrative is concerning. We must be vigilant in separating truth from fiction, especially on sensitive topics like this.
Absolutely. Responsible reporting and fact-based coverage are essential to inform the public accurately and avoid further harm.
It’s disheartening to see the victim’s identity being questioned and manipulated in this way. We should focus on honoring those who have lost their lives, not spreading unsubstantiated claims.
Agreed. Maintaining empathy and respect for the victims should be the top priority, not perpetuating falsehoods.
The dissemination of this misleading information is concerning. It’s a sobering reminder of the importance of verifying sources and facts, especially on sensitive issues.
Absolutely. Maintaining journalistic integrity and respect for the victims should be the top priorities in a case like this.
The dissemination of this false information is deeply concerning. It’s a stark reminder of the need for rigorous fact-checking and responsible reporting, especially on sensitive issues.
Well said. Upholding journalistic integrity and preventing the spread of misinformation should be the primary goals in a case like this.
This false identification is deeply troubling. We must be cautious about sharing unverified claims, especially when they involve the death of an individual.
Agreed. Responsible journalism and fact-checking are essential to ensure accurate reporting and prevent the spread of harmful misinformation.