Listen to the article
The Justice Department’s online library of documents from its investigation into Jeffrey Epstein contains no references to advanced medical technology or so-called “MedBeds,” contrary to claims spreading on social media.
A post circulating on X (formerly Twitter) alleges that Document “DOJ-2024-EF-7721” from the Epstein files reveals the existence of “Medical regeneration technology” at a redacted “Island facility,” accessible only to those with “Level 7+ clearance.” However, searches through the publicly available Department of Justice repository yield no results for this document identification number.
The viral claim, posted by account @MrPool_QQ on February 5, 2026, under the heading “CLASSIFIED: PROJECT MEDBIRTH,” makes numerous unsubstantiated assertions regarding advanced medical technology supposedly being kept from the public. The post alleges that billionaires have access to medical regeneration technology while ordinary citizens are forced to undergo conventional treatments like chemotherapy.
“They had the technology. They kept it for themselves. While you paid for chemo. While your loved ones suffered. While they told you ‘there’s no cure,'” reads part of the post, which suggests a vast conspiracy to withhold medical breakthroughs from the general population.
The post also attempts to connect prominent figures to this alleged technology, stating: “The same names in the flight logs? The same names with access to MedBed.” It specifically mentions Gates and Epstein before asking rhetorical questions about why billionaires supposedly “live to 95 in perfect health” and “age slower.”
Searches for terms like “Medical regeneration technology,” “MedBeds,” and “PROJECT MEDBIRTH” within the Justice Department’s Epstein investigation documents return no matches. The claim also references “Page 847,293” of the files, which vastly exceeds the actual number of pages in the publicly released documents.
The concept of “MedBeds” has been a persistent element in various conspiracy theories, particularly those related to QAnon. These theories typically describe futuristic medical devices capable of curing all diseases and reversing aging, though no credible evidence supports the existence of such technology.
The Epstein files have been the subject of intense public interest following the 2019 arrest and subsequent death of Jeffrey Epstein, who faced federal charges related to sex trafficking. While the documents contain information about Epstein’s network of associates and victims, they do not contain references to secret medical technology as claimed in the viral post.
The timing of the post is also worth noting, as it claims to reference February 2025 as “the month the truth came out,” despite being dated 2026, suggesting it was created to appear as a retrospective revelation.
Misinformation surrounding the Epstein case has flourished on social media, often mixing genuine concerns about powerful figures’ connections to Epstein with unfounded conspiracy theories. This latest claim appears to follow that pattern, leveraging public interest in the case to promote baseless assertions about hidden medical technology.
The Department of Justice continues to make materials from its Epstein investigation available to the public as part of its commitment to transparency, but these documents contain no evidence supporting the extraordinary claims made in the viral social media post.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


6 Comments
The Epstein case has been shrouded in so much speculation and misinformation. I’m glad to see the DOJ taking steps to clear the air and provide factual information to the public.
Absolutely. Conspiracy theories only serve to undermine trust in institutions. This fact check helps restore some confidence in the justice system’s handling of the Epstein investigation.
Interesting fact check on the Epstein files. Glad to see the DOJ is being transparent and debunking these unsubstantiated claims about secret medical tech. Looking forward to more thorough investigations into Epstein’s activities.
Yes, it’s important to rely on official sources and verified information, rather than unproven conspiracy theories. The public deserves the truth, no matter how unsettling.
This is a good reminder to be skeptical of sensational claims, especially those related to high-profile figures and alleged government coverups. The lack of evidence in the Epstein files is telling.
Agreed. It’s crucial that we maintain a critical eye and fact-check information, rather than blindly accepting social media rumors. Transparency and accountability are key.