Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

In a pointed segment that resonated with viewers across the nation, “Daily Show” host Jon Stewart delivered a scathing analysis comparing former President Donald Trump’s behaviors to those of King George III, the British monarch whose actions sparked the American Revolution nearly 250 years ago.

Stewart’s Monday night monologue addressed the recent “No Kings” demonstrations that have taken place across the United States, movements expressing concern over perceived authoritarian tendencies in Trump’s political approach.

“It’s starting to feel like there might be something to this whole king thing,” Stewart remarked, before turning to what he called “the source” of anti-monarchical sentiment in America: the Declaration of Independence.

In a methodical breakdown, Stewart examined several of the 27 grievances the founding fathers lodged against King George III, drawing parallels to actions taken during Trump’s presidency and his current campaign rhetoric.

Reading directly from the historic document, Stewart highlighted the complaint that the king “has kept among us in times of peace, standing armies without the consent of our legislatures.” As Stewart declared this grievance “done,” graphics displayed news headlines about Trump’s deployment of the National Guard to U.S. cities during his administration, particularly during the 2020 protests.

The host then moved to another grievance about “cutting off our trade with all parts of the world,” noting the resemblance to Trump’s trade policies. During his term, Trump initiated multiple trade conflicts and imposed significant tariffs on imports from various countries, including close allies and major trading partners like China.

Economic analysts have consistently pointed out that these tariff policies led to increased consumer prices domestically while simultaneously creating obstacles for American businesses in international markets as other nations implemented retaliatory measures.

Stewart continued his historical comparison by referencing the Declaration’s accusation that King George III “obstructed the administration of justice,” letting the implication hang in the air before moving to perhaps his most pointed comparison.

“‘He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us,'” Stewart read from the document. As he delivered this line, the broadcast displayed images from the January 6, 2021 Capitol riot, when Trump supporters violently stormed the U.S. Capitol in an attempt to prevent the certification of the 2020 presidential election results.

The visual juxtaposition of the 18th-century text with modern footage created a powerful television moment that quickly circulated on social media platforms.

“I mean, come on,” Stewart said, visibly exasperated. “I’m calling it. Look, maybe Trump isn’t an all-powerful king, the kind who can do whatever he wants, but he’s undeniably king-adjacent, king-esque, moving for more.”

Stewart’s segment comes at a time of heightened political tension in the United States, as Trump continues his 2024 presidential campaign while facing multiple legal challenges. Political analysts have noted increased rhetoric from Trump about expanded executive power should he win another term.

Since returning as host of “The Daily Show” earlier this year on a part-time basis, Stewart has consistently used his platform to critique both major political parties, though his commentary on Trump’s approach to governance has been particularly pointed.

The “No Kings” demonstrations referenced in Stewart’s monologue represent growing concerns among some Americans about the potential erosion of democratic institutions and the balance of powers established by the Constitution.

By framing modern political concerns within the context of America’s founding principles, Stewart’s segment attempted to connect contemporary debates about executive power to the historical values that shaped the nation’s identity and governmental structure.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

12 Comments

  1. While I appreciate Stewart’s attempt at a comprehensive fact-check, I think it’s crucial to remain objective and avoid partisan rhetoric when analyzing political figures and their actions.

    • Liam X. Thompson on

      I agree, a balanced and impartial approach is key when evaluating the claims made by both sides. It’s easy for emotions to cloud our judgment on these sensitive issues.

  2. This fact-check from Jon Stewart raises some thought-provoking points, but I would encourage readers to also seek out other authoritative sources and form their own conclusions. Critical thinking is essential when evaluating claims about political figures.

  3. Robert Y. Williams on

    As an investor in mining and energy stocks, I’m always on the lookout for insightful analysis that can help me make more informed decisions. This fact-check from Jon Stewart seems like a valuable resource to consider.

  4. While I don’t necessarily agree with all of Stewart’s conclusions, I think it’s important to engage with this type of critical examination of political rhetoric and behavior. It’s a healthy exercise for a democracy.

    • James A. Moore on

      I agree, healthy debate and fact-checking are essential for maintaining a well-informed citizenry. Even if we don’t fully align with the perspectives presented, it’s important to consider them thoughtfully.

  5. The mining and energy sectors will be closely watching this fact-check, as Trump’s policies have had a significant impact on commodity prices and industry regulations. I’m curious to see how this analysis might influence investor sentiment.

  6. Fascinating to see the parallels Stewart draws between Trump and King George III. The comparison to the grievances in the Declaration of Independence is an intriguing historical perspective.

    • I’m curious to learn more about the specific examples Stewart cited. It’s important to carefully examine these claims and assess their validity.

  7. Lucas Hernandez on

    As someone with a background in the mining industry, I’ll be closely following the reaction to this fact-check. The implications for regulatory changes and commodity markets could be significant.

    • Olivia X. Thomas on

      Absolutely, the mining and energy sectors are always attuned to shifts in the political landscape. This analysis from Jon Stewart could have real-world impacts that are worth tracking.

  8. While I appreciate the effort to provide a comprehensive fact-check, I think it’s important to remember that reasonable people can interpret the same information differently. A diversity of perspectives is healthy for public discourse.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.