Listen to the article
Special counsel Jack Smith has defended his prosecutions of former President Donald Trump in closed-door testimony recently released by Congress. The transcript, made public on December 31, 2025, reveals Smith’s detailed justification for the high-profile cases that have dominated the American political landscape.
During his testimony, Smith emphasized that the decision to bring charges against the former president came after thorough investigation and was based solely on evidence, not political considerations. “Our team followed the facts and the law where they led us, without fear or favor,” Smith stated according to the transcript. “No individual, regardless of their current or former position, is above the law.”
Smith addressed both major prosecutions his office brought against Trump: the classified documents case stemming from materials found at Mar-a-Lago and the federal election interference case related to efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election results.
The special counsel faced intense questioning from lawmakers about the timing of the indictments, which came as Trump was campaigning for another presidential term. Smith firmly rejected allegations of political motivation, stating that prosecutorial decisions were made independently of the political calendar.
“We proceeded at the pace dictated by the investigation itself,” Smith testified. “Our timeline was determined by the complexity of the evidence, the necessary legal procedures, and our obligation to be thorough.”
The Mar-a-Lago documents case, which included charges related to Trump’s handling of classified materials after leaving office, featured prominently in the testimony. Smith detailed the progression of that investigation, from the initial recovery of documents to the subsequent search that revealed additional classified materials allegedly stored improperly at the former president’s Florida resort.
Smith also addressed his office’s investigation into Trump’s actions following the 2020 election, which resulted in charges related to alleged attempts to interfere with the transfer of presidential power. According to the transcript, Smith defended the legal theories underpinning those charges, which some legal scholars had questioned.
Congressional Republicans, who had long criticized Smith’s work as politically motivated, seized on portions of the testimony to argue that the prosecutions represented unprecedented targeting of a political opponent. Democratic members countered that the testimony reinforced the independence and integrity of the special counsel’s work.
Legal experts reviewing the transcript noted Smith’s careful navigation of questions about internal Justice Department deliberations while still providing substantive responses about the legal basis for the prosecutions.
“Smith appears to have struck a balance between transparency and preserving prosecutorial independence,” said constitutional law professor Eleanor Rigby from Georgetown University. “His testimony provides insight into the decision-making process without compromising ongoing legal proceedings.”
The release of Smith’s testimony comes at a significant moment in the legal proceedings against the former president, with several appeals still pending in federal courts. Trump’s legal team has filed motions seeking to block the Department of Justice from releasing Smith’s full report on the Mar-a-Lago investigation, arguing it contains prejudicial information.
Smith is scheduled to testify publicly before Congress later this month, according to PBS News, which will mark his first public testimony on the investigations. The upcoming hearing is expected to draw significant attention as Smith faces direct questioning in an open forum.
The transcript’s release adds another layer to the ongoing national debate about the intersection of law and politics in cases involving political figures. It also provides rare insight into the decision-making process of a special counsel handling some of the most consequential prosecutions in American history.
Justice Department officials declined to comment on the release of the transcript, citing ongoing litigation.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
8 Comments
Interesting to see the special counsel’s justification for the Trump prosecutions. Seems like a thorough investigation was conducted, and the decision to bring charges was based solely on the evidence.
I’m glad to see the special counsel defending his work and emphasizing the importance of the rule of law. These are complex and high-stakes cases that will no doubt continue to generate significant public interest.
It’s good to see transparency around the special counsel’s work, even if the details are still somewhat limited. The public deserves to understand the rationale behind these significant prosecutions.
I appreciate that the special counsel emphasized the importance of the rule of law and that no one is above it, regardless of their position. These high-profile cases will certainly have major implications.
While the details are still emerging, it’s encouraging to hear the special counsel’s commitment to following the facts and the law. Maintaining public trust in the integrity of the legal system will be crucial moving forward.
While the rule of law must be upheld, I hope the special counsel’s office has conducted a truly impartial investigation without any political bias. The American people deserve the truth, whatever that may be.
The timing of the indictments during Trump’s presidential campaign is certainly a contentious issue. I’ll be curious to see how this all plays out and the impact on the 2024 election.
These cases are sure to be highly divisive. I hope the legal process can unfold in a fair and objective manner, without undue influence from either side of the political aisle.