Listen to the article
Eastern Iowa School Districts Challenge Governor’s Education Funding Proposal
Several school districts across Eastern Iowa are mobilizing to press state lawmakers for increased education funding, arguing that Governor Kim Reynolds’ proposed 2% boost in funding falls significantly short of what public schools need to maintain quality education.
Dr. Brad Buck, superintendent at Waukee Community School District and former head of Iowa’s Department of Education under Governor Terry Branstad, has emerged as a leading voice in this funding debate. Before his current role at Waukee, Dr. Buck served as superintendent for Cedar Rapids schools, giving him extensive experience in Iowa’s education landscape.
Buck’s analysis of the Governor’s proposal has drawn attention from local media, as he demonstrates that the apparent 2% increase actually translates to less than half a percent in real terms. His calculations expose a critical gap between the headline figure and the practical impact on school budgets.
“Anymore, it doesn’t matter if it’s a good time or a lean time. The legislature has been giving generally speaking less than inflation,” Dr. Buck explained, highlighting a concerning trend in state education funding.
At the heart of the issue is State Supplemental Aid (SSA), the primary mechanism for state funding to public schools, which is allocated on a per-pupil basis. This funding structure reveals the challenge facing public education in Iowa: enrollment in public schools declined by approximately 7,300 students this year, while private and charter schools saw increasing enrollment numbers.
With the current funding rate of $7,988 per student, this enrollment shift represents more than $58 million less for the public school system. Consequently, last year’s seemingly substantial 2% increase in SSA effectively amounted to just a 0.4% increase in overall funding when accounting for the reduced student population.
The declining enrollment trend is expected to continue steadily over the next several years, adding urgency to the districts’ funding requests. Dr. Buck argues that given Iowa’s current financial position, the state has capacity to provide more robust support to public education.
“It’s the lifeblood of school districts. And so, any increases in SSA go a long way towards maintaining high-quality staff, maintaining programs in schools,” Dr. Buck emphasized, underscoring the fundamental importance of adequate funding.
Buck is advocating for a 4% increase in State Supplemental Aid, while Cedar Rapids, Decorah, South Tama and several other public school districts have united behind a petition calling for an even more substantial 5% increase.
The funding debate comes at a critical juncture for Iowa’s education system. As public schools face the dual challenges of declining enrollment and limited funding increases, many districts report difficulties in recruiting and retaining qualified teachers and maintaining educational programs, especially in specialized areas and extracurricular activities.
Education experts note that Iowa, once nationally recognized for its excellent public education system, has seen its ranking slip in recent years. The Iowa State Education Association has pointed to inadequate funding as a key factor in this decline.
The legislature’s decision on education funding will have lasting implications for Iowa’s approximately 485,000 public school students. Districts warn that continued underfunding may force difficult decisions about program cuts, increased class sizes, or deferred maintenance and technology investments.
Governor Reynolds’ office maintains that Iowa continues to prioritize education funding, pointing to various education initiatives beyond basic per-pupil funding. However, school administrators counter that these targeted programs don’t address the fundamental operational needs that SSA is designed to cover.
The funding proposal is expected to be a central topic as the Iowa Legislature continues its 2024 session.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.


11 Comments
This is a complex issue without easy answers. On one hand, states face difficult tradeoffs in allocating limited budgets. On the other, quality public education is foundational to a thriving society. I hope the stakeholders can find a middle ground that adequately supports Iowa’s students and teachers.
The gap between the proposed 2% increase and the actual 0.4% effective increase is quite concerning. It’s critical that public school funding keeps pace with inflation and the evolving needs of students. I hope the state legislature can work constructively with districts to find a sustainable solution.
This highlights the importance of carefully analyzing the details behind budget announcements, rather than just looking at the headline figures. It’s good to see school superintendents like Dr. Buck taking a proactive stance in pushing for more accurate and meaningful funding for Iowa’s public schools.
Agreed. Digging into the nuances is key to understanding the real-world impact of funding decisions. Kudos to the school leaders for bringing transparency to this issue.
The budget constraints faced by Iowa’s public schools are a complex issue. It’s concerning to see the disconnect between the stated funding increase and the actual impact on school budgets. More transparency and a closer look at the nuances is needed to ensure students receive the quality education they deserve.
You raise a fair point. Funding education is always a challenge, especially when dealing with differing interpretations of the numbers. Open dialogue between school districts and state leadership will be crucial to find a workable solution.
This discrepancy between the announced funding increase and the actual impact is quite concerning. Public education is a vital public good, and it’s troubling to see the funding falling short of inflation and evolving student needs. I hope the state and districts can work together constructively to find a sustainable solution.
This is a complex issue without easy answers. On one hand, states face difficult tradeoffs in allocating limited budgets. On the other, quality public education is foundational to a thriving society. I hope the stakeholders can find a middle ground that adequately supports Iowa’s students and teachers.
Funding public schools is always a challenge, but it’s crucial that the numbers add up in a meaningful way. Kudos to the school leaders for digging into the details and advocating for their districts. Transparent and collaborative policymaking will be key to ensuring Iowa’s students get the resources they need.
Maintaining quality public education should be a top priority for any state. While budgets are always tight, it’s troubling to see the apparent discrepancy between the stated funding boost and the actual impact on school districts. Transparent and collaborative policymaking is needed to ensure Iowa’s students get the resources they require.
The analysis by Dr. Buck highlights an important issue – the need for accurate, transparent reporting on the real-world impact of funding decisions. While balancing budgets is never easy, ensuring quality public education should be a top priority. I hope the stakeholders can find a collaborative path forward.