Listen to the article
Maryland GOP Chair’s Email on Trump’s First Year Contains Factual Inaccuracies
A recent email blast from Nicole Beus Harris, chairwoman of the Maryland Republican Party, has come under scrutiny for containing multiple factual inaccuracies while celebrating President Donald Trump’s first year back in office.
The email, titled “President Trump’s First Year” and sent to Maryland Republicans on Saturday, January 24, promised to deliver “real results” rather than talking points. However, an analysis of the claims reveals several statements that do not align with official economic data.
Among the most significant discrepancies is the assertion that inflation has been “slashed to just 2.4%.” According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Consumer Price Index release from January 13, 2026, the overall inflation rate for the twelve months ending December 2025 was actually 2.7 percent. The 2.4 percent figure cited in the email appears to correspond specifically to the “food at home” subcategory, which measures grocery prices only.
The context is also important here: inflation moved from approximately 2.9 percent in December 2024 to 2.7 percent in December 2025, representing a modest two-tenths of a percentage point decline rather than a dramatic reduction.
Another questionable claim concerns gas prices, which the email states are “down to around $2.74 nationwide.” According to AAA’s National Average Gas Prices data from January 20, 2026, the actual national average was between $2.82 and $2.84 per gallon. The $2.74 figure more closely aligns with regional averages in lower-cost states like West Virginia, not the national average.
Perhaps most striking is the assertion that the “trade deficit cut nearly in half through strong tariffs.” U.S. trade data indicates the annual trade deficit for 2025 remains over $1 trillion – approximately $1.26 trillion in the total goods gap – which is consistent with or slightly higher than 2024 levels. The claim appears to reference a single anomalous month, October 2025, when the deficit temporarily fell by approximately 39 percent due to tariff implementation timing and seasonal fluctuations.
Not all claims in the email were inaccurate. The statement about military recruitment seems to be supported by Department of Defense data, which confirmed that Fiscal Year 2025 saw the highest mission-achievement rate in more than fifteen years, with an average completion rate of 103 percent across all branches.
Similarly, border security claims align with Customs and Border Protection figures, which reported 8,386 apprehensions between ports of entry in September 2025, described as the lowest level since 1970. The email’s reference to NATO allies committing to a new defense investment target of 5 percent of GDP annually, up from the previous 2 percent, also appears accurate according to outcomes from the 2025 NATO Summit in The Hague.
As chairwoman of the Maryland Republican Party and spouse of Rep. Andy Harris, Maryland’s lone Republican congressman, Beus Harris holds significant influence within state politics. Her dissemination of incorrect economic data raises questions about the party’s approach to factual reporting when communicating with constituents.
The inconsistencies in the email highlight broader challenges in political messaging, where the pressure to present favorable narratives sometimes conflicts with statistical accuracy. While political parties routinely frame data to support their positions, presenting fundamentally incorrect figures crosses into different territory.
For Maryland voters attempting to evaluate the current administration’s economic performance, such discrepancies complicate the task of making informed assessments based on objective measures. Economic indicators like inflation rates, gas prices, and trade deficits are straightforward metrics published by government agencies and independent organizations, making them relatively simple to verify.
The Maryland Republican Party has not yet issued any corrections or clarifications regarding the inaccurate claims in the email as of publication time.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
18 Comments
The discrepancy between the stated and actual inflation figures is concerning. Reliable data is crucial for assessing economic performance and making informed decisions. This highlights the need for rigorous fact-checking, even of high-profile claims.
I agree, accuracy in economic reporting is critical. This incident demonstrates the importance of verifying claims, especially those made by political leaders. It’s a good reminder to be vigilant about fact-checking.
The discrepancy between the stated and actual inflation figures is concerning. Accurate data reporting is essential for evaluating economic conditions and policy. This incident demonstrates the need for greater diligence in fact-checking, even at the highest levels of government.
I agree, this is a worrying lapse in accuracy. Elected officials must be held to high standards when communicating with the public. Fact-checking and transparency are crucial for maintaining trust in our political institutions.
It’s troubling to see inaccuracies in an official communication from the GOP chair. Transparency and truthfulness should be top priorities for elected officials. This episode underscores the need for robust fact-checking and accountability measures.
Absolutely. Providing the public with reliable information is a core responsibility of political leaders. This lapse highlights the importance of rigorous review and correction of any factual errors.
This episode highlights the importance of verifying claims, even from senior political figures. Accurate data reporting is crucial for assessing economic performance and informing policy decisions. I hope this will lead to more diligence in fact-checking to ensure the public receives reliable information.
Well said. Transparency and accountability should be top priorities for elected officials. This incident underscores the need for a robust fact-checking process to identify and correct any inaccuracies in public communications.
This highlights the importance of rigorous fact-checking, even for senior political figures. Accurate data reporting is crucial for assessing economic performance and informing policy decisions. I hope this incident leads to more diligence in verifying claims made by public officials.
Well said. Transparency and accountability should be paramount, especially when it comes to the communication of economic data. This episode underscores the need for a robust fact-checking process to ensure the public receives reliable information.
The discrepancy between the stated and actual inflation figures is concerning. Precise data reporting is essential for evaluating economic conditions and policy. This incident demonstrates the need for greater scrutiny of claims made by political leaders, to ensure the public receives accurate information.
I agree, this lapse in accuracy is troubling. Fact-checking and transparency are critical for maintaining trust in our political institutions. This should serve as a wake-up call for more rigorous review of public statements, especially those involving key economic metrics.
The discrepancy between the stated 2.4% inflation figure and the actual 2.7% rate is concerning. Precise data reporting is critical for assessing economic performance. I hope this will prompt more rigorous review of public claims.
Absolutely, details matter when it comes to economic metrics. Accuracy should be the top priority, especially for elected officials communicating with constituents.
This is a good example of why it’s important to scrutinize political claims, even from party leadership. Fact-checking helps maintain trust in the political process. I hope this incident leads to more diligence in the future.
Well said. Fact-checking is essential for ensuring transparency and accountability in government. It’s the responsibility of both officials and the public to uphold these standards.
Interesting to see the GOP chair’s claims challenged on economic data accuracy. It’s important to fact-check such statements, especially when they involve key metrics like inflation. Transparency and accountability are crucial in politics.
I agree, it’s concerning to see inaccuracies in an official communication. Fact-checking is essential to ensure the public receives reliable information.