Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

In a move that has sent shockwaves through the economic and political landscape, President Donald Trump fired Bureau of Labor Statistics Commissioner Erika McEntarfer hours after the agency released disappointing July employment data. The president claimed the job numbers were “phony” and accused McEntarfer of manipulating data to benefit Democrats, though he has provided no evidence to support these allegations.

The August 1 BLS report showed minimal job growth of just 73,000 positions in July, along with significant downward revisions for May and June, reducing those months’ combined job growth by 258,000 positions. The data indicates the economy has added 486,000 jobs during Trump’s second term, a growth rate of 0.3% – roughly half the pace seen during the same period last year.

Former BLS commissioners from both Republican and Democratic administrations have strongly refuted the president’s claims that the numbers could have been manipulated. Kathy Utgoff, appointed by President George W. Bush, stated in an interview that commissioners “can’t rig the numbers” and have “no ability to change the numbers that come out of computers at the last minute.”

William Beach, who served as BLS commissioner during Trump’s first term, described an identical process, explaining that “by the time the commissioner sees the numbers, they’re all prepared. They’re locked into the computer system.” Beach called McEntarfer’s firing “totally groundless” and warned it “sets a dangerous precedent and undermines the statistical mission of the Bureau.”

The BLS, which produces crucial data on employment, wages, and inflation, has long maintained a reputation for nonpartisan statistical work. Its monthly employment estimates are based on the establishment survey, which collects data from approximately 121,000 employers representing about 30% of U.S. employment.

Trump’s timeline regarding past BLS announcements also contains significant inaccuracies. Contrary to his claim that the agency released “beautiful numbers” for Democrats days before the election, the November 1 pre-election jobs report actually showed weak growth of just 12,000 jobs in October – a figure Fox News described as “dismal” and the Trump campaign called “a catastrophe.”

The president also referenced an 800,000-900,000 job reduction announced after the election, but this appears to refer to a preliminary annual benchmark revision announced in August 2023, which is part of the agency’s standard procedure. The final revision, announced in February 2024 as routinely scheduled, was a downward adjustment of 589,000 jobs.

McEntarfer, an economist with over 20 years of government service, was confirmed to her four-year term in January 2024 by an overwhelmingly bipartisan Senate vote of 86-8, with support from current Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

David Wilcox, former chair of the Federal Economic Statistics Advisory Committee, emphasized that BLS staff “understand to their core the importance of delivering the best possible estimates, even if and when the message is inconvenient for the president and his team.” He noted that while the recent revisions were “larger than normal,” they reflect the nature of statistical estimates rather than manipulation.

Following the firing, a group called Friends of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which includes former commissioners from both parties, issued a statement calling Trump’s claims “baseless” and warning they “undermine the credibility of federal economic statistics that are a cornerstone of intelligent economic decision-making by businesses, families, and policymakers.”

The administration has proposed an 8% cut to the BLS budget for fiscal year 2026 and plans to reorganize the agency along with the Census Bureau and Bureau of Economic Analysis into a single entity within the Department of Commerce.

Verify This Yourself

Use these professional tools to fact-check and investigate claims independently

Reverse Image Search

Check if this image has been used elsewhere or in different contexts

Ask Our AI About This Claim

Get instant answers with web-powered AI analysis

👋 Hi! I can help you understand this fact-check better. Ask me anything about this claim, related context, or how to verify similar content.

Related Fact-Checks

See what other fact-checkers have said about similar claims

Loading fact-checks...

Want More Verification Tools?

Access our full suite of professional disinformation monitoring and investigation tools

10 Comments

  1. Isabella Smith on

    Firing the BLS commissioner over disappointing job numbers seems like an extreme and concerning reaction. I hope the administration provides clear evidence to back up such a drastic move.

  2. The economic slowdown during Trump’s second term is an interesting data point, though of course many factors influence job growth. I wonder how this compares to previous administrations.

  3. The downward revisions to the previous months’ job growth are noteworthy. I wonder if there are any insights into what caused those adjustments and what they might signal about the broader economic trends.

  4. It’s good that the article provides context around the economic data and the views of experts. Fact-checking claims of data manipulation is important for maintaining trust in government statistics.

  5. Glad to see the article includes input from former BLS commissioners of both parties. Their statements about the inability to rig the data seem reassuring from a nonpartisan perspective.

  6. Accusations of data manipulation are serious and should be backed up with strong evidence. The former BLS commissioners’ statements suggesting the numbers can’t be easily rigged seem credible.

  7. The job growth numbers do seem to point to a slowdown in the economy. It will be important to monitor the data closely going forward to get a clear picture of the economic trends.

  8. Elijah Jackson on

    I’m curious to hear more about the specific reasons behind the downward revisions to the May and June job growth figures. That seems like an important detail to understand the full context.

  9. Interesting that the former BLS commissioners from both parties have refuted Trump’s claims. It’s important to rely on credible, nonpartisan sources when it comes to economic data.

  10. Given the political tensions around economic data, it’s good to see fact-checkers scrutinizing the claims and looking at the views of nonpartisan experts. Maintaining the integrity of official statistics is crucial.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2025 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved. Designed By Sawah Solutions.