Listen to the article
Immigration Officials Clarify Location of Father and Son Detained in Minnesota
A 5-year-old boy and his father, who were detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers earlier this week, are not being held at an El Paso detention facility as some reports had suggested, according to statements made by the family’s attorney.
During a news conference held on January 22, the lawyer representing Liam Conejo Ramos and his father, Adrian Alexander Conejo Arias, confirmed that the pair are currently detained at the South Texas Family Residential Center in Dilley, Texas. This information has been verified through ICE’s Online Detainee locator system, which shows Conejo Arias at the Dilley facility, though it does not list minors in its public database.
The father and son were taken into custody on January 20 in Minnesota as they were returning from the child’s preschool, according to reporting from the Associated Press. The detention has drawn attention to the ongoing practices of immigration enforcement and family detention policies.
Texas houses two primary detention centers designed to hold families with children: the Dilley facility where Conejo Arias and his son are being held, and the Karnes County Residential Center in Karnes City. Both facilities have been at the center of immigration debates for years, particularly regarding the ethics and legality of detaining children in such environments.
The Camp East Montana detention facility at Fort Bliss, which had been incorrectly identified as the location where the pair was being held, is one of the largest immigration detention facilities in the United States with capacity for up to 5,000 people. However, this facility does not accommodate children, making it an unlikely location for the father and son.
Immigration detention practices have remained a contentious issue across multiple administrations. The South Texas Family Residential Center in Dilley, where the pair is being held, has a capacity of approximately 2,400 people and has previously faced scrutiny from human rights organizations regarding conditions for detainees, particularly children.
The detention of families with children has been especially controversial, with advocates arguing that such facilities can cause psychological harm to young detainees regardless of the conditions. Legal challenges to family detention policies have been ongoing for years, with courts frequently weighing in on acceptable standards and duration of detention for minors.
ICE protocols typically require that detained families with children be processed differently than single adults, with considerations made for the well-being of minors. However, implementation of these policies has varied over time and across different regions.
The Conejo Arias case highlights the complex reality of immigration enforcement actions that separate families or place them in detention facilities. It also demonstrates how misinformation about detainee locations can spread, potentially complicating efforts by legal representatives and family members to provide support and advocacy.
As this case develops, immigration rights organizations will likely continue monitoring the situation of the father and son, particularly given the young age of Liam Conejo Ramos and the circumstances of their detention following a routine school day.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
6 Comments
I’m glad the authorities were able to provide clarity on the location of the father and son. This case shines a light on the complexities and sensitivities around immigration enforcement, especially when it involves minors. Hopefully, the wellbeing of the child is the top priority.
It’s encouraging to see that the authorities have provided clarity on this case, but the detention of a young child is still very concerning. This situation shines a light on the complexities and sensitivities surrounding immigration enforcement and the need for a more compassionate approach.
This case is a sobering reminder of the real-world impacts of immigration policies and enforcement practices. While the clarification on the location of the father and son is helpful, the detention of a 5-year-old child is deeply troubling and raises important questions about the welfare of vulnerable populations.
This case underscores the need for a more humane and compassionate approach to immigration enforcement, particularly when it involves vulnerable populations like young children. Detaining a 5-year-old is extremely concerning and raises serious questions about the policies and practices in place.
While it’s good that the authorities have clarified the location of the father and son, the fact that a 5-year-old child was detained at all is deeply troubling. This case highlights the urgent need for reforms to address the human impacts of immigration enforcement.
This is a concerning situation that highlights the ongoing challenges with immigration enforcement and family detention policies. It’s good that the authorities have clarified the location of the father and son, but the detention of a 5-year-old child is troubling.