Listen to the article
TIME Magazine Cover Controversy: Trump Portrait Draws Comparisons to Nazi War Criminal
A recent TIME magazine cover featuring former President Donald Trump has sparked controversy after observers noted striking similarities between the portrait and a famous 1963 photograph of convicted Nazi war criminal Alfried Krupp. The comparison, first reported by The Daily Beast, has since gained traction on social media, with many pointing out compositional parallels between the two images.
The TIME cover shows Trump seated at the Resolute Desk in the Oval Office, his arms folded in a distinctive V-shape under his chin, with an intense glare reminiscent of his 2023 mugshot. The photograph was taken by Washington-based photographer Steven Voss for TIME’s feature titled “Trump’s world. President Donald Trump talks to TIME about his efforts to end the war in Gaza.”
Social media users quickly drew connections between Trump’s portrait and Arnold Newman’s infamous 1963 Newsweek photograph of Krupp. One user on X (formerly Twitter) wrote: “Trump’s latest Time magazine cover appears to have been inspired by one of the most chilling portraits of the 20th century…A 1963 Newsweek photograph of Alfred Krupp, a convicted Nazi war criminal.”
The Daily Beast reported that Voss initially liked Instagram comments asking if he was referencing Newman’s portrait of Krupp, though these likes were apparently later removed. The publication claimed it had “learnt of” a connection between the two photographs, though this has not been independently verified.
TIME magazine has categorically denied any intentional connection between the images. In a statement to The Daily Beast, the publication said: “There is no connection and claims suggesting otherwise are completely untrue. The references for this photoshoot were past presidential portraits in the Oval Office, including TIME’s own covers. Giving weight to speculation on social media is reckless and contributes to the spread of misinformation.”
This controversy comes shortly after Trump himself publicly criticized TIME for a previous cover photo published on October 13. On his Truth Social platform, Trump complained about what he called “the Worst of All Time” picture, claiming the magazine “disappeared” his hair and used an unflattering low angle that made it look like he had “a floating crown, but an extremely small one.”
The subject of the comparison, Alfried Krupp, was the fifth and final family head of the massive Krupp industrial empire in Germany. During World War II, Krupp plants were among Germany’s largest employers of slave labor and manufactured Tiger tanks used in Russia and North Africa. Krupp was convicted of war crimes at Nuremberg in 1948 and sentenced to 12 years imprisonment, though he served only six years before his sentence was commuted.
The 1963 photograph at the center of the controversy was taken by Arnold Newman, a Jewish photographer who initially refused the Newsweek assignment. Newman later recounted to American Photo magazine: “When the editors asked me to photograph him, I refused. I said, ‘I think of him as the devil.’ They said, ‘Fine—that’s what we think.’ So I was stuck with the job.”
Newman’s portrait became famous for its menacing composition. He positioned Krupp on a raised platform against a stark industrial backdrop, asked him to clasp his hands and lean forward, and lit him from below—a technique more commonly associated with horror films than portraiture.
The comparison between the two photographs comes at a particularly sensitive time in American politics, with presidential imagery taking on heightened symbolic importance during an election year. Magazine covers featuring presidential candidates and sitting presidents have long been analyzed for their visual messaging and potential biases.
Whether intentional or coincidental, the controversy highlights the power of visual communication in politics and the way historical references can shape public perception of contemporary figures.
Verify This Yourself
Use these professional tools to fact-check and investigate claims independently
Reverse Image Search
Check if this image has been used elsewhere or in different contexts
Ask Our AI About This Claim
Get instant answers with web-powered AI analysis
Related Fact-Checks
See what other fact-checkers have said about similar claims
Want More Verification Tools?
Access our full suite of professional disinformation monitoring and investigation tools
10 Comments
This is a complex issue that deserves careful, unbiased analysis. While the visual similarities are intriguing, we should be wary of rushing to conclusions without a comprehensive examination of the evidence and context.
Well said. Maintaining objectivity and avoiding sensationalism is crucial when exploring potential connections between contemporary figures and historical events. The public deserves a measured, fact-based exploration of this story.
This is a fascinating story, but I’d want to see a more in-depth analysis before making any definitive judgments. The visual parallels are thought-provoking, but context and intent are key in understanding the significance, if any.
Well said. Responsible journalism should explore this comparison carefully, without sensationalism or unsubstantiated claims. The public deserves a balanced, evidence-based examination of the facts.
The alleged connection to a Nazi war criminal is certainly alarming, but I’d want to see more concrete evidence before accepting that claim. Visuals can be compelling, but we must be cautious about drawing conclusions without rigorous investigation.
I agree, the comparison is thought-provoking, but making definitive judgments requires a thorough, impartial review of the facts. Responsible reporting is essential when dealing with such sensitive historical associations.
Interesting comparison, though it’s important to be cautious about making broad connections without solid evidence. The visual similarities are noteworthy, but we should avoid jumping to conclusions about any intentional references or symbolism.
I agree, the similarities are striking but drawing definitive conclusions requires more thorough investigation. Fact-checking is crucial when dealing with charged political imagery.
The alleged link between the TIME cover and the Nazi war criminal is certainly attention-grabbing, but I’d want to see a more rigorous investigation before accepting such a claim. Visual parallels can be compelling, but we must be cautious about drawing definitive conclusions.
Agreed. While the comparison is intriguing, we should refrain from making sweeping judgments without a thorough, impartial examination of the evidence. Responsible journalism requires a balanced approach to potentially sensitive historical connections.