Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

In a bizarre twist following the attack on U.S. Representative Ilhan Omar, false claims have emerged alleging that her suspected attacker was secretly on her payroll. These baseless allegations, which spread rapidly across social media platforms, exemplify how misinformation can flourish in the wake of high-profile incidents.

The fabricated story claimed that CBS News had reported Anthony James Kazmierczak, the man suspected of attacking Omar during a Minneapolis town hall on January 27, was “actually on Omar’s payroll, pulling in $50,000 a year from her phony winery.” The rumor quickly gained traction on Facebook and X (formerly Twitter) after the incident, in which Kazmierczak allegedly sprayed Omar with an unidentified liquid during her public address.

An examination of CBS News’ website and reporting reveals no such coverage existed. No credible news organization has reported any employment connection between Omar and her alleged attacker. The claim appears to have originated from a Facebook account belonging to Jonathan Gregory, a self-described comedian who claims to work for conservative media outlet Newsmax as a “Digital Content Creator for the Trump Administration.”

Gregory’s post featured formatting that mimicked legitimate news articles, including a byline suggesting it was official Newsmax content. However, no articles with Gregory’s byline appear on the actual Newsmax website, and the outlet’s coverage of the Omar attack made no mention of any employment relationship between the congresswoman and Kazmierczak.

The false narrative emerged against a backdrop of heightened political tension. Just one day before the attack, former President Donald Trump had targeted Omar on social media, claiming “the DOJ and Congress are looking at ‘Congresswoman’ Ilhan Omar, who left Somalia with NOTHING, and is now reportedly worth more than 44 Million Dollars.” The post alluded to supposed financial impropriety, though The New York Times reported a previous Department of Justice investigation into Omar’s finances had “stalled for lack of evidence.”

The fabricated story also referenced a winery in Santa Rosa, California, in which Omar’s husband, Tim Mynett, reportedly holds a financial interest. This detail appears designed to lend credibility to the false narrative by incorporating real elements of Omar’s personal connections.

In the aftermath of the January 27 attack, Trump further inflamed tensions by promoting unfounded claims that Omar had staged the incident for political gain. The fabricated CBS report follows this same pattern of baseless allegations, concluding with politically charged language: “This farce underscores why Trump is the only leader who can restore integrity to Washington: no more staged distractions, no more fake businesses funding anti-American agendas.”

This incident illustrates the speed with which misinformation can spread in today’s media environment, particularly when it targets polarizing political figures. Posts with hallmarks of satire or parody can quickly be stripped of context and presented as factual news, especially when they align with existing political narratives.

Media literacy experts consistently advise consumers to verify information from multiple reliable sources, particularly when claims seem designed to provoke strong emotional reactions or reinforce existing political beliefs. In this case, a simple verification with CBS News would have quickly revealed the story to be fabricated.

As investigations into the actual attack continue, distinguishing between verified reporting and misinformation remains crucial for an informed public discussion about the incident and its implications.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

10 Comments

  1. Linda W. Williams on

    It’s disheartening to see how quickly misinformation can spread, especially around high-profile events. I’m glad the article was able to debunk these false claims about the alleged attacker’s connection to Ilhan Omar. We need to be vigilant about verifying information before sharing it.

  2. Jennifer Rodriguez on

    This is a concerning incident, but I’m glad to see the Fact Check article setting the record straight. Unfounded allegations like these can be very damaging, so it’s crucial that we rely on credible sources of information.

  3. Patricia Taylor on

    I’m disappointed to see these kinds of unsubstantiated claims spreading so quickly. It’s a good thing the Fact Check article was able to debunk them and provide some much-needed clarity on the situation. We need to be vigilant about fact-checking, especially when it comes to high-profile events.

  4. This is a concerning incident, and I’m glad to see the Fact Check article addressing these false claims. It’s a good reminder that we need to be cautious about sharing information that hasn’t been properly verified, even if it seems sensational or compelling.

  5. This is a concerning incident, but it’s important to rely on factual reporting rather than unsubstantiated claims. It’s troubling to see misinformation spreading so quickly, especially around high-profile events. I hope the authorities can provide clarity on the situation.

    • Isabella W. Brown on

      I agree, the spread of misinformation is a real problem these days. It’s crucial that we carefully verify claims before sharing them, especially when they involve public figures.

  6. I’m glad the Fact Check article was able to debunk these false claims about the alleged attacker’s connection to Ilhan Omar. It’s a good reminder to be skeptical of unverified rumors, especially those that seem too sensational to be true.

    • Jennifer Thompson on

      Absolutely. Fact-checking is so important in an age where misinformation can travel so quickly online. I appreciate journalists taking the time to thoroughly investigate these types of claims.

  7. The spread of misinformation is a real problem, and it’s troubling to see these kinds of unsubstantiated claims gaining traction. I appreciate the Fact Check article for taking the time to thoroughly investigate the situation and set the record straight.

    • Robert X. Smith on

      I agree, it’s crucial that we rely on credible sources of information, especially when it comes to sensitive incidents like this. Fact-checking is so important in an age where misinformation can travel so quickly.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.