Listen to the article
Homeland Security Secretary’s Hurricane Remark Sparks Online Controversy
During a White House Cabinet meeting on December 2, 2025, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem made a comment that quickly sparked widespread reaction across social media platforms. In her remarks to President Donald Trump, Noem said, “Sir, you made it through hurricane season without a hurricane. And so, FEMA, FEMA… you, even you kept the hurricanes away, so we appreciate that.”
The moment, captured during the publicly broadcast meeting, was immediately circulated online with some accounts suggesting Noem was seriously crediting Trump with controlling weather patterns. Progressive groups, including Occupy Democrats, shared the clip with captions comparing the remark to North Korean-style leader worship.
However, full video context reveals the comment was clearly received as a joke by those present. Audible laughter can be heard throughout the room, and Noem seamlessly continued her substantive comments about the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) afterward, indicating the hurricane remark was an impromptu quip rather than a serious assertion.
The incident highlights the increasingly polarized nature of political discourse in America, where brief moments from official proceedings can be rapidly shared with varying degrees of context across social media platforms. The clip spread quickly across Facebook, Instagram, Threads, TikTok, X, YouTube, and Bluesky, with many shares omitting the audience reaction that framed the comment as humorous.
The 2025 Atlantic hurricane season, which Noem referenced, was indeed unusually quiet in terms of landfalling hurricanes. According to USA Today reporting, no hurricanes made direct landfall on U.S. soil during the year – a notable departure from the increasingly active hurricane seasons of the previous decade.
Despite the absence of direct hurricane impacts, the U.S. still experienced significant tropical weather effects in 2025. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration documented how remnants of Tropical Storm Barry contributed to catastrophic flash flooding in Texas that claimed more than 135 lives, including children and adults at summer camps. Similarly, at least six people died in North Carolina from flooding caused by the remnants of Tropical Storm Chantal in July.
The Cabinet meeting where Noem made her remark was itself the source of multiple viral moments and claims. Other contentious stories emerging from the same December 2 meeting included allegations that Trump fell asleep during proceedings and that Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth’s name card incorrectly displayed “Secretary of War” rather than his proper title.
Neither the Department of Homeland Security nor the White House immediately responded to media requests for comment about Noem’s hurricane statement or the social media reaction it generated.
The incident serves as a reminder of how quickly political moments can be amplified online, often with crucial context removed. While Noem did make the statement attributed to her, the full video evidence shows it was delivered and received as a lighthearted aside rather than a serious claim about presidential weather control – a distinction lost in many of the viral shares across social platforms.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
15 Comments
This fact check serves as a valuable reminder of the importance of context and nuance in political discourse. It’s easy for comments to be taken out of context and used to further divide us, but we must strive to have more thoughtful, evidence-based discussions if we want to make progress on the issues that matter.
The reaction to Noem’s comment about Trump preventing hurricanes is a troubling sign of the increasing polarization in our political landscape. It’s crucial that we strive for more civil, fact-based dialogue if we want to make progress on the real issues facing the country.
This fact check serves as a reminder of the importance of critical thinking and fact-based analysis when it comes to political discourse. While Noem’s comment may have been intended as a joke, the reaction it sparked highlights the need for more nuanced, evidence-based discussions to bridge the growing divides in our society.
While Noem’s comment about Trump preventing hurricanes was clearly a jest, the reaction it sparked is a concerning reflection of the deeply polarized political landscape. We must strive for more nuanced discussions that prioritize facts over partisan rhetoric.
This incident underscores the challenges of navigating political discourse in the modern era. It’s important to look beyond the sensationalism and consider the full context before drawing conclusions, as knee-jerk reactions can often do more harm than good.
The reaction to Noem’s comment is a testament to the polarized political climate we find ourselves in. While the remark was clearly meant as a joke, the fact that it sparked such a strong response highlights the need for more civil, fact-based dialogue across the aisle.
The reaction to Noem’s comment highlights the challenges of maintaining civil and productive political discussions in the digital age. While the remark was clearly a joke, it’s concerning to see how quickly it was seized upon and used to further inflame partisan tensions.
This incident serves as a reminder of the need for more nuanced, evidence-based political discourse. In an era of heightened partisanship, it’s crucial that we look beyond sensational soundbites and consider the full context before drawing conclusions.
Well said. Jumping to conclusions without considering the full picture can lead to the further entrenchment of political divides, which ultimately hinders our ability to address the real issues facing the country.
This highlights the challenges of political discourse in the digital age, where clips can be taken out of context and used to inflame tensions. It’s important to look at the full context before jumping to conclusions, as the laughter in the room suggests this was not a serious assertion.
Exactly, the context is crucial. Jumping to conclusions without considering the full picture can lead to the spread of misinformation, which is counterproductive to having productive discussions around important issues.
While the comment about Trump preventing hurricanes was clearly tongue-in-cheek, it’s understandable that it would spark strong reactions given the highly charged political climate. Fact-checking and providing full context is important to avoid the further spread of misinformation.
This fact check is a valuable exercise in cutting through the noise and examining the full context of a politically charged statement. While Noem’s remark may have been intended as a jest, the reaction it sparked underscores the need for more nuanced, evidence-based discussions in our public discourse.
The fact check on Noem’s hurricane remark is a valuable exercise in separating political rhetoric from reality. In an age of heightened partisanship, it’s crucial that we approach such issues with a clear head and an eye for context, rather than jumping to conclusions based on limited information.
Interesting fact check on Kristi Noem’s claim about Trump preventing hurricanes. While the comment was clearly meant as a joke, it’s concerning to see the increasing polarization around political issues, even simple ones. We should strive for more nuanced, fact-based discussions.