Listen to the article
In a digital landscape increasingly cluttered with misinformation, a false claim about former Philadelphia Eagles center Jason Kelce has recently gained traction across social media platforms. The fabricated story alleged that Kelce established the “Renee Good Hope Scholarship Fund” with a personal contribution of $300,000 to honor Renee Good, a Minneapolis resident who was fatally shot by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer in early January.
The viral claim, which spread primarily through Facebook in late January, included supposed photographs of Kelce embracing Good’s 6-year-old son and emotional images of Kelce himself. These posts frequently linked to advertisement-heavy WordPress blogs, suggesting a profit motive behind the misinformation.
Investigation into the rumor revealed multiple red flags. No credible news organizations reported on such a scholarship fund, which would have been significant news given Kelce’s prominence as a recently retired NFL star and media personality. The images accompanying the posts showed clear signs of artificial intelligence generation, with Google’s SynthID Detector tool confirming at least some portions contained digital watermarks consistent with AI creation.
The Facebook page “Chiefs Strategy Central,” one of the primary distributors of the false claim, is managed by five individuals based in Vietnam according to the page’s transparency information. The melodramatic language used in their post—featuring phrases like “a quiet, powerful act of humanity” and “compassion can still speak louder than silence”—bore hallmarks of AI-generated content.
This fabrication appears to be part of a larger pattern of manufactured “glurge”—sentimental, supposedly uplifting stories about celebrities performing extraordinary acts of kindness that prove entirely fictional upon closer examination. These stories often generate significant engagement on social media, driving traffic to websites filled with advertisements.
The elaborate narrative claimed Kelce’s supposed scholarship would provide “full educational support from elementary school through college” for Good’s son, including “tuition, books, tutoring, and opportunities for personal growth.” It emphasized the supposedly private nature of Kelce’s generosity, claiming “there were no cameras chasing charity” and “no speeches asking for praise.”
Media literacy experts note that this type of content represents a growing challenge in distinguishing fact from fiction online. The false Kelce story follows a similar pattern to another recently debunked claim that Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Jalen Hurts had established a scholarship fund in Good’s memory.
What makes such misinformation particularly insidious is its exploitation of real tragedy. Renee Good’s death at age 37 at the hands of ICE officer Jonathan Ross was a genuine incident that occurred in Minneapolis on January 7. By co-opting actual events and inserting fabricated celebrity involvement, creators of such content blur the lines between reality and fiction.
Representatives for Kelce, who now co-hosts the popular “New Heights” podcast with his brother Travis Kelce of the Kansas City Chiefs, did not immediately respond to requests for comment about the false claims.
This incident highlights the growing sophistication of AI-generated content and the challenges it presents for social media users attempting to verify information. In one particularly troubling development, a Google search about the alleged scholarship fund mistakenly generated an AI answer confirming the false rumor, citing two Facebook posts as authoritative sources.
As digital technology continues to evolve, the intersection of artificial intelligence, social media algorithms, and profit-driven content creation presents growing challenges for information integrity in the digital age.
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
9 Comments
Fabricated stories like this one highlight the need for critical thinking when consuming online content. It’s a good lesson in verifying information before sharing it, even if it aligns with our own beliefs or desires.
While it’s disappointing to learn this story is false, I’m glad the truth has been uncovered. Fact-checking is an important part of responsible journalism and civic discourse.
Thanks for the fact check. It’s troubling how quickly misinformation can spread online, especially when it plays on people’s emotions. We need to be vigilant about checking sources and not sharing unverified stories.
Glad this false claim has been debunked. It’s important to verify information, especially when it seems too good to be true. Spreading misinformation, even unintentionally, can do real harm.
The detailed investigation into this claim is commendable. It’s a valuable reminder that we should be skeptical of stories that seem too good to be true, and always check the facts before sharing or believing them.
This fact check is a important service to the public. Verifying information, especially around sensitive topics, is essential for maintaining trust and preventing the further spread of misinformation.
This is a good example of why we should be cautious about viral social media posts, even if they seem heartwarming. Doing a bit of research to verify the facts can go a long way in preventing the spread of misinformation.
This is a concerning example of how misinformation can spread quickly online. I appreciate the diligent effort to uncover the truth and set the record straight. Fact-checking is crucial for maintaining trust in media and public discourse.
I appreciate the in-depth investigation into this claim. It’s a good reminder to be skeptical of sensational stories, especially those that seem to lack credible sources. Fact-checking is crucial in the digital age.