Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

European regulators have launched an investigation into TikTok, claiming that certain design features of the popular social media platform may foster addictive behavior patterns, particularly among younger users. The European Commission’s action represents a significant shift in tech regulation, focusing not only on content moderation but also on how platforms are fundamentally designed.

The investigation falls under the European Union’s Digital Services Act, which requires large online platforms to identify and address what regulators term “systemic risks,” including potential threats to mental health and child safety. Commission officials have specifically highlighted features such as infinite scrolling, autoplay functionality, and algorithm-based recommendation systems as potentially problematic elements that could encourage compulsive usage patterns.

“These design features can create what we call ‘digital rabbit holes’ where users lose track of time and develop unhealthy usage habits,” said a Commission spokesperson familiar with the investigation. “Our concern is particularly acute when it comes to younger users who may be more susceptible to these engagement tactics.”

The case remains in its preliminary phases, giving TikTok an opportunity to respond before regulators reach any definitive conclusions. However, the stakes are considerable – companies found in violation of the Digital Services Act face potential fines of up to 6% of their global annual revenue. Beyond financial penalties, the EU could mandate design modifications to reduce features deemed potentially addictive.

In response to the investigation, TikTok has issued a statement indicating disagreement with portions of the Commission’s assessment while highlighting existing safety measures the company has implemented, including screen-time reminders and parental control options. “We take our responsibility to users seriously and have invested significantly in features that promote digital wellbeing,” a TikTok representative stated.

The investigation reflects a broader European regulatory approach that increasingly scrutinizes the fundamental architecture of digital platforms rather than solely focusing on harmful content.

The scientific understanding of “social media addiction” remains nuanced. While not currently recognized as a formal clinical diagnosis, researchers have extensively studied how certain platform features may encourage habitual or compulsive usage patterns in some individuals.

Dr. Maria Hernandez, a digital psychology researcher at University College London, explains: “The combination of endless content feeds, personalized recommendations, and unpredictable rewards creates powerful behavioral loops that can be difficult for some users to regulate, similar to mechanisms we see in other behavioral addictions.”

Unlike the European Union’s direct regulatory approach to platform design, the United States has adopted a more fragmented strategy. The U.S. currently lacks comprehensive federal legislation specifically targeting potentially addictive design features in the way the EU’s Digital Services Act does.

Existing U.S. regulations like the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) primarily focus on data privacy for children under 13 rather than engagement tactics or design elements. Meanwhile, proposed legislation such as the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) would require platforms to mitigate potential harms to minors, including design practices that may increase screen time, but this bill has yet to become federal law.

The EU’s action against TikTok highlights a growing global conversation about the appropriate regulatory framework for social media. As European regulators increasingly focus on platform architecture and design ethics, U.S. lawmakers continue debating the scope and approach of potential federal regulations.

Industry observers note that the outcome of the European Commission’s investigation could have far-reaching implications for how social media platforms design their products globally, potentially establishing new standards for digital engagement across the industry.

Fact Checker

Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.

6 Comments

  1. As a parent, I’m glad to see the EU taking a closer look at the potential mental health impacts of social media, especially on younger users. Platforms like TikTok need to prioritize user wellbeing over engagement metrics.

    • I agree. Responsible design and moderation practices should be mandatory for large social media companies. Protecting vulnerable users, especially children, should be the top priority.

  2. Isabella White on

    The Digital Services Act seems like a positive step in regulating tech companies and addressing systemic risks. Focusing on design features that encourage addictive usage is an important angle that often gets overlooked.

  3. Interesting that regulators are looking into the addictiveness of social media platforms. TikTok’s features like autoplay and algorithmic recommendations do seem designed to keep users scrolling endlessly. I wonder if this investigation will lead to changes in how these platforms are designed.

  4. Elizabeth X. Johnson on

    As someone who uses TikTok, I can see how the endless scrolling and algorithmically curated content can suck you in. Regulators are right to be concerned about the mental health implications, especially for young people.

  5. I’m curious to see what specific design changes or new regulations could come out of this TikTok investigation. Addressing the underlying drivers of compulsive social media use is crucial, not just content moderation.

Leave A Reply

A professional organisation dedicated to combating disinformation through cutting-edge research, advanced monitoring tools, and coordinated response strategies.

Company

Disinformation Commission LLC
30 N Gould ST STE R
Sheridan, WY 82801
USA

© 2026 Disinformation Commission LLC. All rights reserved.