Listen to the article
Trump’s Border Czar Misleads on Immigrant Crime Statistics
Tom Homan, the Trump administration’s border czar, has repeatedly claimed that “over 600,000 illegal aliens with criminal records” are currently “walking the streets of this nation.” This statement, made at multiple public appearances including a Turning Point USA Student Action Summit in Tampa and during a Fox News interview, presents a misleading characterization of immigration enforcement data.
When pressed for the source of this figure, the White House cited a 2024 letter from then-Department of Homeland Security Deputy Director Patrick Lechleitner to Republican Representative Tony Gonzales. The letter stated that “nearly 650,000 criminal aliens were on the Non-Detained Docket” as of July 2024.
However, a closer examination of the data reveals several important nuances omitted from Homan’s public statements.
The 647,572 individuals on the non-detained list include not only those who entered the country illegally but also legal permanent residents and people on long-term non-immigrant visas who became potentially removable due to criminal issues. The data makes no distinction between undocumented immigrants, visa overstays, and those with legal status.
The severity of the offenses also varies significantly. Of the total, about 20% (126,343) had traffic offenses, while another 92,075 had immigration violations. This means at least a third of the cases involve non-violent offenses.
More serious charges in the data include 14,944 homicide cases, 20,061 sexual assault cases, 105,146 assault cases, 30,631 larceny charges, and 21,106 fraud-related offenses.
Crucially, not all individuals in the dataset have been convicted. Approximately 33% (222,141) have only been charged with crimes, with no information provided on how many of these cases resulted in convictions.
The Department of Homeland Security has previously clarified that this figure spans immigrants who entered the country over the past four decades, not just recent arrivals. This historical context is consistently absent from Homan’s public statements.
Another significant omission is that the “non-detained” classification doesn’t necessarily mean these individuals are freely “walking the streets.” DHS acknowledged in a previous statement that the list “includes many who are under the jurisdiction or currently incarcerated by federal, state or local law enforcement partners.” Despite repeated inquiries, DHS has not provided specific numbers on how many people from this list are actually in custody of other agencies.
Michelle Mittelstadt, communications director for the nonpartisan Migration Policy Institute, points out that people with criminal convictions who are not in custody have “presumably served whatever sentence was imposed on them.” It’s also possible that some individuals on the list have already been deported.
The Trump administration has emphasized its focus on deporting immigrants with criminal backgrounds. When asked about current enforcement priorities, a DHS spokesperson stated that Secretary Kristi Noem was using Immigration and Customs Enforcement to “target the worst of the worst.”
This isn’t the first time the administration has used these statistics in potentially misleading ways. During his campaign, former President Trump cited the same data to claim that then-Vice President Kamala Harris “let in 13,099 convicted murderers,” a figure he later adjusted to “11,888 murderers.”
When questioned about these discrepancies, White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson responded with a statement alleging that “Joe Biden let thousands upon thousands of violent criminal illegal aliens into American communities,” and asserting that “President Trump will deport them all.”
Fact Checker
Verify the accuracy of this article using The Disinformation Commission analysis and real-time sources.
16 Comments
The article does a good job of unpacking the complexities behind the statistics cited by the border official. It’s a valuable lesson in the importance of critical analysis when it comes to political rhetoric.
Exactly. We must be vigilant in scrutinizing claims, especially on sensitive topics, to ensure the public is accurately informed.
This is an important fact-check that underscores the need for rigorous analysis and transparency around immigration statistics. Misleading claims can have serious consequences, so it’s vital that we get the details right.
Well said. Holding officials accountable and challenging inaccurate narratives is essential for maintaining trust in our democratic institutions.
This highlights the importance of carefully scrutinizing official statements, especially on sensitive topics like immigration. We need to dig deeper and consider the full context and details behind the numbers.
Yes, it’s a good reminder to be wary of oversimplified narratives and to seek out reliable, unbiased sources when forming opinions on these matters.
The article’s detailed examination of the data nuances is really valuable. It’s a good reminder that we should be wary of simplistic narratives when it comes to complex social issues like immigration.
Absolutely. Responsible reporting that avoids sensationalism and focuses on objective facts is crucial for fostering an informed and productive public discourse.
Interesting story. It’s concerning to see misleading claims being made about immigrant crime statistics. Accurate data and nuanced analysis are so important when discussing complex immigration issues.
Agreed. Responsible reporting and fact-checking are crucial to avoid perpetuating harmful misconceptions.
The article provides a helpful analysis of the nuances in the data. It’s concerning to see how a statement can misrepresent the reality of the situation. Fact-checking is so vital.
Absolutely. Transparent and accountable data reporting is essential for informed public discourse on immigration policy.
This story highlights the need for greater transparency and accountability around immigration data. Misleading statements can have real-world impacts, so fact-checking is essential.
I agree. Rigorous, unbiased analysis is vital to cut through political spin and provide the public with a clear, evidence-based understanding of the issues.
This is a timely and important fact-check. Misleading claims about immigrant crime rates can have serious consequences, so it’s crucial that we get the facts straight.
Well said. Responsible journalism that challenges inaccurate narratives is a cornerstone of a healthy democracy.